Valuing patents and licenses from a business strategy perspective – Extending valuation considerations using the case of nanotechnology

Currently there is a debate in the field of nanotechnology about the evolving IP landscape and its impact on innovative progress based on technological discovery in the future. Nevertheless, nanotechnology patents will serve as an important securitization instrument for future financing and business strategic purposes. Valuation know-how of nanotechnology patents will therefore become critical in deal-making and in bringing about innovation. Like many innovative products today, nanotechnology enabled products also consist of a multitude of patented technological components from different stages in a value chain and belonging to a multitude of owners. Complex IP landscapes along entire value chains give rise to a tendency to over-value one's own patented technology from an ex-ante and individual company's perspective. Thus the sum of individually estimated values of patented technology can exceed the value that can be realized ex-post in a given value chain. We extend current valuation considerations of patented technology from a static perspective to include a dynamic view using nanotechnology as an example. Furthermore, in addition to single value chain stages as a level of analysis (level A) we also take into account the complex technology landscapes in entire value chains (level B) as well as patented technologies' potential value in different current or future value chains (level C). We derive conclusions with respect to valuation approaches for the discussed levels of analysis from a static and dynamic perspective.

[1]  Chun-Yao Tseng,et al.  Valuation of patent – a real options perspective , 2006 .

[2]  Robert H. Pitkethly,et al.  THE VALUATION OF PATENTS : A review of patent valuation methods with consideration of option based methods and the potential for further research , 1997 .

[3]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[4]  Robert H. Pitkethly.  Intellectual property strategy in Japanese and UK companies: patent licensing decisions and learning opportunities , 2001 .

[5]  F. Bass.  A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[6]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Richard Razgaitis,et al.  Valuation and Pricing of Technology-Based Intellectual Property , 2003 .

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[9]  Janice M. Mueller,et al.  No 'Dilettante Affair': Rethinking the Experimental Use Exception to Patent Infringement for Biomedical Research Tools , 2009 .

[10]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[11]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value , 2006 .

[12]  S. Triest,et al.  Valuing patents on cost-reducing technology: A case study , 2007 .

[13]  Vittorio Chiesa,et al.  The valuation of technology in buy‐cooperate‐sell decisions , 2005 .

[14]  Jeffrey C. Hall,et al.  Advances in Genetics , 1947 .

[15]  Zan Huang,et al.  International nanotechnology development in 2003: Country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database , 2004 .

[16]  Tsuyoshi Numagami,et al.  Dynamic interaction between strategy and technology , 1992 .

[17]  Jan Tobochnik,et al.  Modeling innovation by a kinetic description of the patent citation system , 2005 .

[18]  David Kline,et al.  Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents , 1999 .

[19]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[20]  Van Lente,et al.  Building the New World of Nanotechnology , 2006 .

[21]  R. Eisenberg.  Reaching through the genome. , 2003, Advances in genetics.

[22]  M. Scheu,et al.  Mapping nanotechnology patents: The EPO approach , 2006 .

[23]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on technology , 1977 .

[24]  John C. Miller.  The Handbook of Nanotechnology: Business, Policy, and Intellectual Property Law , 2004 .

[25]  Thorsten Teichert,et al.  Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis , 2005 .

[26]  M. Reitzig.  Improving patent valuations for management purposes--validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales , 2004 .

[27]  Yongtae Park,et al.  A new method for technology valuation in monetary value: procedure and application , 2004 .

[28]  Martin S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the “value” of academic patents: IP management practices in UK universities and their implications for Third-Stream indicators , 2007, Scientometrics.