Evaluation of sustainable hydrogen production options using an advanced hybrid MCDM approach: A case study

[1]  Harsh K. Verma,et al.  AHP-neutrosophic decision model for selection of relay node in wireless body area network , 2020, CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol..

[2]  Zheng He,et al.  Exploring the barriers to renewable energy adoption utilising MULTIMOORA- EDAS method , 2020 .

[3]  Harish Garg,et al.  Algorithms for possibility linguistic single-valued neutrosophic decision-making based on COPRAS and aggregation operators with new information measures , 2019, Measurement.

[4]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) , 2015, Informatica.

[5]  I. Dincer,et al.  Experimental study of hydrogen production process with aluminum and water , 2020 .

[6]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  A novel neutrosophic CODAS method: Selection among wind energy plant locations , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[7]  I. Dincer,et al.  Life cycle assessment study on nuclear based sustainable hydrogen production options , 2020 .

[8]  M. Webber,et al.  Impacts of renewable hydrogen production from wind energy in electricity markets on potential hydrogen demand for light-duty vehicles , 2019, Applied Energy.

[9]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Sustainability Decision Support Framework for Industrial System Prioritization , 2016 .

[10]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Smart energy systems for a sustainable future , 2017 .

[11]  Po-Chien Chang,et al.  Fuzzy Delphi method for evaluating hydrogen production technologies , 2011 .

[12]  Di Xu,et al.  Technology selection for sustainable hydrogen production: A multi-criteria assessment framework under uncertainties based on the combined weights and interval best-worst projection method , 2020 .

[13]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  An integrated neutrosophic ANP and VIKOR method for achieving sustainable supplier selection: A case study in importing field , 2019, Comput. Ind..

[14]  Dipankar Deb,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy COPRAS based multi-criteria decision making for hybrid wind farms , 2020 .

[15]  V. Dinh,et al.  Development of a viability assessment model for hydrogen production from dedicated offshore wind farms , 2020 .

[16]  Serkan Eker,et al.  Hydrogen gas production from waste paper by dark fermentation: Effects of initial substrate and biomass concentrations , 2017 .

[17]  Qi Huang,et al.  Environmental impact of hydrogen production from Southwest China's hydro power water abandonment control , 2020 .

[18]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Life cycle sustainability decision-support framework for ranking of hydrogen production pathways under uncertainties: An interval multi-criteria decision making approach , 2018 .

[19]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Role prioritization of hydrogen production technologies for promoting hydrogen economy in the current state of China , 2015 .

[20]  Diego Iribarren,et al.  Life cycle assessment of hydrogen energy systems: a review of methodological choices , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[21]  H. Argun,et al.  Bio-hydrogen production from waste peach pulp by dark fermentation: Effect of inoculum addition , 2017 .

[22]  Lichun Dong,et al.  A multi-criterion decision making for sustainability assessment of hydrogen production technologies based on objective grey relational analysis , 2020 .

[23]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  Solving Solar-Wind Power Station Location Problem Using an Extended Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) Technique with Interval Neutrosophic Sets , 2017, Symmetry.

[24]  Santanu Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis of different hydrogen production technologies using AHP and Fuzzy AHP , 2014 .

[25]  Lichun Dong,et al.  Sustainability assessment and decision making of hydrogen production technologies: A novel two-stage multi-criteria decision making method , 2020 .

[26]  Huchang Liao,et al.  Extended Pythagorean Fuzzy TOPSIS Method Based on Similarity Measure for Sustainable Recycling Partner Selection , 2019, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[27]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  A grey-based group decision-making methodology for the selection of hydrogen technologies in life cycle sustainability perspective , 2012 .

[28]  Y. El hassouani,et al.  Analysis of the yield and production cost of large-scale electrolytic hydrogen from different solar technologies and under several Moroccan climate zones , 2020 .

[29]  I. Dincer,et al.  Evaluation of hydrogen production via electrolysis with ion exchange membranes , 2020 .

[30]  Belkhir Negrou,et al.  GIS based multi-criteria decision making for solar hydrogen production sites selection in Algeria , 2019 .

[31]  J. Botas,et al.  Perovskite materials for hydrogen production by thermochemical water splitting , 2016 .

[32]  G. Nilay Yücenur,et al.  An integrated solution with SWARA&COPRAS methods in renewable energy production: City selection for biogas facility , 2020 .

[33]  Mazlan Abdul Wahid,et al.  Hydrogen from solar energy, a clean energy carrier from a sustainable source of energy , 2020, International Journal of Energy Research.

[34]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets - Theory and Applications , 1999, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[35]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[36]  Ahmet Beskese,et al.  Sustainability analysis of different hydrogen production options using hesitant fuzzy AHP , 2018, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[37]  Muhammet Deveci.  Site selection for hydrogen underground storage using interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy sets , 2018 .

[38]  Mohammad Izadikhah,et al.  Assessing sustainability of supply chains by chance-constrained two-stage DEA model in the presence of undesirable factors , 2017, Comput. Oper. Res..

[39]  Tao Zhang,et al.  A study of decision process in MCDM problems with large number of criteria , 2015, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[40]  Ahmad Makui,et al.  An Integrated Delphi-DEMATEL-ELECTRE Method on Gray Numbers to Rank Technology Providers , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.