Progress and Challenges in Screening for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer*

Ovarian cancer is characterize by few early symptoms, presentation at an advanced stage, and poor survival. As a result, it is the most frequent cause of death from gynecological cancer. During the last decade, a research effort has been directed toward improving outcomes for ovarian cancer by screening for preclinical, early stage disease using both imaging techniques and serum markers. Numerous biomarkers have shown potential in samples from clinically diagnosed ovarian cancer patients, but few have been thoroughly assessed in preclinical disease and screening. The most thoroughly investigated biomarker in ovarian cancer screening is CA125. Prospective studies have demonstrated that both CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound can detect a significant proportion of preclinical ovarian cancers, and refinements in interpretation of results have improved sensitivity and reduced the false-positive rate of screening. There is preliminary evidence that screening can improve survival, but the impact of screening on mortality from ovarian cancer is still unclear. Prospective studies of screening are in progress in both the general population and high-risk population, including the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS), a randomized trial involving 200,000 postmenopausal women designed to document the impact of screening on mortality. Recent advances in technology for the study of the serum proteome offer exciting opportunities for the identification of novel biomarkers or patterns of markers that will have greater sensitivity and lead time for preclinical disease than CA125. Considerable interest and controversy has been generated by initial results utilizing surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) in ovarian cancer. There are challenging issues related to the design of studies to evaluate SELDI and other proteomic technology, as well as the reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of this new technology. Large serum banks such as that assembled in UKCTOCS, which contain preclinical samples from patients who later developed ovarian cancer and other disorders, provide a unique resource for carefully designed studies of proteomic technology. There is a sound basis for optimism that further developments in serum proteomic analysis will provide powerful methods for screening in ovarian cancer and many other diseases.

[1]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer , 2002, The Lancet.

[2]  R. Kryscio,et al.  Transvaginal sonography as a screening method for the detection of early ovarian cancer. , 1997, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  B. Nilsson,et al.  The significance of serum CA 125 elevation in malignant and nonmalignant diseases. , 2002, Gynecologic oncology.

[4]  T. Bourne,et al.  Feasibility Study of a Randomised Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening among the General Population , 1994, Journal of medical screening.

[5]  A. Tabor,et al.  Feasibility Study of a Randomised Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening , 1994, Journal of medical screening.

[6]  B. Mol,et al.  Distinguishing the benign and malignant adnexal mass: an external validation of prognostic models. , 2001, Gynecologic oncology.

[7]  R. Berkowitz,et al.  Screening for ovarian cancer: the preliminary experience of a familial ovarian cancer center. , 1993, Gynecologic oncology.

[8]  R. Kryscio,et al.  The malignant potential of small cystic ovarian tumors in women over 50 years of age. , 1998, Gynecologic oncology.

[9]  R. Bast,et al.  A radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody to monitor the course of epithelial ovarian cancer. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  I. Timor-Tritsch,et al.  Transvaginal Sonographic Characterization of Ovarian Disease: Evaluation of a New Scoring System to Predict Ovarian Malignancy , 1991, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  L. Valentin,et al.  Frequency and type of adnexal lesions in autopsy material from postmenopausal women: ultrasound study with histological correlation , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[12]  E. Diamandis Point: Proteomic patterns in biological fluids: do they represent the future of cancer diagnostics? , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  J. Satagopan,et al.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Steven J Skates,et al.  Screening for ovarian cancer: a pilot randomised controlled trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[15]  O. Mogensen,et al.  Neural networks in the diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumours , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  R. Bast,et al.  Reactivity of a monoclonal antibody with human ovarian carcinoma. , 1981, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[17]  R. Bast,et al.  OVX1 radioimmunoassay results are dependent on the method of sample collection and storage. , 1999, Clinical chemistry.

[18]  I. Jansson,et al.  Macroscopic characterization of ovarian tumors and the relation to the histological diagnosis: criteria to be used for ultrasound evaluation. , 1989, Gynecologic oncology.

[19]  G. Yousef,et al.  Human kallikrein 6 (zyme/protease M/neurosin): a new serum biomarker of ovarian carcinoma. , 2000, Clinical biochemistry.

[20]  Liam D. Turner,et al.  Design and evolution of the data management systems in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. , 2000, Controlled clinical trials.

[21]  T. R. Holbert Screening transvaginal ultrasonography of postmenopausal women in a private office setting. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  E. Thomson,et al.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2 , 1997 .

[23]  Rainer Cramer,et al.  Detection and analysis of urinary peptides by on-line liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry: application to patients with renal Fanconi syndrome. , 2003, Clinical science.

[24]  J. Grudzinskas,et al.  Prevalence screening for ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women by CA 125 measurement and ultrasonography. , 1993, BMJ.

[25]  R. Bast,et al.  Combination of multiple serum markers using an artificial neural network to improve specificity in discriminating malignant from benign pelvic masses. , 1999, Gynecologic oncology.

[26]  R. Bast,et al.  Tissue Distribution of a Coelomic- Epithelium‐Related Antigen Recognized by the Monoclonal Antibody OC125 , 1983, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[27]  R. Bast,et al.  Elevation of multiple serum markers in patients with stage I ovarian cancer. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  R. Borovik,et al.  Screening for ovarian cancer in women with breast cancer with transvaginal sonography and color flow imaging , 1993, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[29]  I. Timor-Tritsch,et al.  Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses with an improved, weighted scoring system. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  P. Schellhammer,et al.  Serum protein fingerprinting coupled with a pattern-matching algorithm distinguishes prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia and healthy men. , 2002, Cancer research.

[31]  D. Chan,et al.  Proteomics and bioinformatics approaches for identification of serum biomarkers to detect breast cancer. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[32]  P. Schwartz,et al.  Early detection and screening for ovarian cancer , 1995, Journal of cellular biochemistry. Supplement.

[33]  S. Guerriero,et al.  Is three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound better than two-dimensional power Doppler? , 2002, Gynecologic oncology.

[34]  A. Monteagudo,et al.  Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses by means of color flow-directed Doppler measurements and a morphologic scoring system. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[35]  H. Burger,et al.  Inhibins/activins as diagnostic markers for ovarian cancer , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[36]  E. Kohn,et al.  Proteomic analysis and identification of new biomarkers and therapeutic targets for invasive ovarian cancer , 2002, Proteomics.

[37]  R. Berkowitz,et al.  Prostasin, a potential serum marker for ovarian cancer: identification through microarray technology. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[38]  J. Hopper,et al.  Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[39]  V. Zurawski,et al.  Elevated serum CA 125 levels prior to diagnosis of ovarian neoplasia: Relevance for early detection of ovarian cancer , 1988, International journal of cancer.

[40]  K Offit,et al.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. , 1997, JAMA.

[41]  R. Millo,et al.  Sonographic evaluation of ovarian volume in postmenopausal women: a screening test for ovarian cancer? , 1990, Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology.

[42]  T. Bourne,et al.  The potential role of serum CA 125 in an ultrasound‐based screening program for familial ovarian cancer , 1994, Gynecologic oncology.

[43]  D. Pauler,et al.  Screening Based on the Risk of Cancer Calculation From Bayesian Hierarchical Changepoint and Mixture Models of Longitudinal Markers , 2001 .

[44]  E. Thomson,et al.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. I. Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. , 1997, JAMA.

[45]  M. Nap Immunohistochemistry of CA 125 , 1998, The International journal of biological markers.

[46]  B. Karlan,et al.  Ovarian cancer tumor marker behavior in asymptomatic healthy women: implications for screening. , 2000, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[47]  B. Rockhill Proteomic patterns in serum and identification of ovarian cancer , 2002, The Lancet.

[48]  R. Berkowitz,et al.  Osteopontin as a potential diagnostic biomarker for ovarian cancer. , 2002, JAMA.

[49]  J. Seelen,et al.  Transvaginal colour flow imaging and ovarian cancer. , 1990, BMJ.

[50]  R. Bast,et al.  Increased serum levels of macrophage colony-stimulating factor in ovarian cancer. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[51]  R. Berkowitz,et al.  Molecular evidence for multifocal papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum in patients with germline BRCA1 mutations. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[52]  P. Kenemans,et al.  Heterologous double-determinant immunoradiometric assay CA 125 II: reliable second-generation immunoassay for determining CA 125 in serum. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[53]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma, a phenotypic variant of familial ovarian cancer: implications for ovarian cancer screening. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[54]  G. Adonakis,et al.  A combined approach for the early detection of ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women. , 1996, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[55]  P. Doubilet,et al.  Ovarian Masses: Can Benign and Malignant Lesions be Differentiated with Color and Pulsed Doppler US? , 1994, Radiology.

[56]  W P Collins,et al.  A comparison of methods for preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses: the development of a new logistic regression model. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[57]  R. Kryscio,et al.  Preoperative differentiation of malignant from benign ovarian tumors: the efficacy of morphology indexing and Doppler flow sonography. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[58]  J. Satagopan,et al.  Outcome of preventive surgery and screening for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[59]  A. Jakubowska,et al.  [Hereditary ovarian cancer: summary of 5 years of experience]. , 1998, Ginekologia Polska.

[60]  I. Jacobs,et al.  PREVALENCE SCREENING FOR OVARIAN CANCER USING RISK OF OVARIAN CANCER ALGORITHM , 2003, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[61]  E J Pavlik,et al.  The efficacy of transvaginal sonographic screening in asymptomatic women at risk for ovarian cancer. , 2000, Gynecologic oncology.

[62]  Qing-Yu He,et al.  Serum biomarkers of hepatitis B virus infected liver inflammation: A proteomic study , 2003, Proteomics.

[63]  Gordon B Mills,et al.  Overexpression of kallikrein 10 in epithelial ovarian carcinomas. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[64]  K. Heimdal,et al.  Prospectively detected cancer in familial breast/ovarian cancer screening , 1999, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[65]  R. Bast,et al.  Differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer with tumour markers CA 125, CA 15‐3 and TAG 72.3 , 1993, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[66]  F. Kikkawa,et al.  Clinical value of CA125, CA19-9, CEA, CA72-4, and TPA in borderline ovarian tumor. , 1996, Gynecologic oncology.

[67]  Min Zhan,et al.  A data review and re-assessment of ovarian cancer serum proteomic profiling , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.

[68]  Weimin Zhu,et al.  Processing of serum proteins underlies the mass spectral fingerprinting of myocardial infarction. , 2003, Journal of proteome research.

[69]  S. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Development of two new monoclonal antibodies reactive to a surface antigen present on human ovarian epithelial cancer cells. , 1991, Cancer research.

[70]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Induction of angiogenesis during the transition from hyperplasia to neoplasia , 1989, Nature.

[71]  Ja Wilson,et al.  Principles and practice of screening for disease , 1968 .

[72]  Steven J Skates,et al.  Calculation of the risk of ovarian cancer from serial CA-125 values for preclinical detection in postmenopausal women. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[73]  P. Wilkinson,et al.  Ovarian cancer antigen CA125: a prospective clinical assessment of its role as a tumour marker. , 1984, British Journal of Cancer.

[74]  I. Jacobs,et al.  Risk of diagnosis of ovarian cancer after raised serum CA 125 concentration: a prospective cohort study , 1996, BMJ.

[75]  G. Yousef,et al.  Expanded Human Tissue Kallikrein Family – A Novel Panel of Cancer Biomarkers , 2002, Tumor Biology.

[76]  Usha Menon,et al.  Performance of ultrasound as a second line test to serum CA125 in ovarian cancer screening , 2000, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[77]  M Nap,et al.  Specificity and affinity of 26 monoclonal antibodies against the CA 125 antigen: first report from the ISOBM TD-1 workshop. International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine. , 1996, Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine.

[78]  A. Kurjak,et al.  An attempt to screen asymptomatic women for ovarian and endometrial cancer with transvaginal color and pulsed Doppler sonography. , 1994, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[79]  R. Bast,et al.  CA 125 in ovarian cancer: advances and controversy. , 1998, Clinical chemistry.

[80]  P. Møller,et al.  Early detection of familial ovarian cancer. , 1996, European journal of cancer.

[81]  Susan L Neuhausen,et al.  Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[82]  M. Elwood Proteomic patterns in serum and identification of ovarian cancer , 2002, The Lancet.

[83]  E. Ferrazzi,et al.  Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses: comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter study , 1997, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[84]  M. Grönroos,et al.  Evaluation of ovarian findings in asymptomatic postmenopausal women with color doppler ultrasound , 1995, Cancer.

[85]  A. Kurjak,et al.  Three‐dimensional ultrasonographic and power Doppler characterization of ovarian lesions , 2000, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[86]  Y. Saito,et al.  Usefulness of mass screening for ovarian carcinoma using transvaginal ultrasonography. , 2000, Cancer.

[87]  I. Jacobs,et al.  Ultrasound assessment of ovarian cancer risk in postmenopausal women with CA125 elevation , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[88]  B. Karlan,et al.  A multidisciplinary approach to the early detection of ovarian carcinoma: rationale, protocol design, and early results. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[89]  J. X. Pang,et al.  Biomarker discovery in urine by proteomics. , 2002, Journal of proteome research.

[90]  Davor Jurkovic,et al.  Sonographic prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using an artificial neural network , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[91]  M. Sakamoto,et al.  Serum and tissue measurements of CA72-4 in ovarian cancer patients. , 1993, Gynecologic oncology.

[92]  R. Bast,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Serum CA 125 Levels for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer , 1992, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[93]  B. Yin,et al.  Isolation and characterization of ovarian cancer antigen CA 125 using a new monoclonal antibody (VK‐8): identification as a mucin‐type molecule , 1997, International journal of cancer.

[94]  L. Valentin,et al.  Pattern recognition of pelvic masses by gray‐scale ultrasound imaging: the contribution of Doppler ultrasound , 1999, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[95]  C. Westhoff Current status of screening for ovarian cancer. , 1994, Gynecologic oncology.

[96]  M Markman,et al.  Lysophosphatidic acid as a potential biomarker for ovarian and other gynecologic cancers. , 1998, JAMA.

[97]  M R Conaway,et al.  Combinations of multiple serum markers are superior to individual assays for discriminating malignant from benign pelvic masses. , 1995, Gynecologic oncology.

[98]  S. Kupesic,et al.  Transvaginal color Doppler and pelvic tumor vascularity: lessons learned and future challenges , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[99]  D. Fishman,et al.  Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound improves the diagnostic accuracy for ovarian cancer prediction. , 2001, Gynecologic oncology.

[100]  M. Quinn,et al.  Screening for ovarian cancer using serum CA125 and vaginal examination: report on 2550 females , 1994, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[101]  R. Kryscio,et al.  Risk of Malignancy in Unilocular Ovarian Cystic Tumors Less Than 10 Centimeters in Diameter , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[102]  John K. Gohagan,et al.  The prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial , 2000 .

[103]  T. Bourne,et al.  Screening for early familial ovarian cancer with transvaginal ultrasonography and colour blood flow imaging. , 1993, BMJ.

[104]  G. Casey,et al.  The familial ovarian cancer registry: progress report. , 1995, Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine.

[105]  F. Kikkawa,et al.  Clinical value of a new serum tumor marker, CA125II, in gynecologic disease: comparison with CA125. , 1995, Gynecologic and obstetric investigation.

[106]  T. Miyamoto,et al.  Bilateral Oophorectomy in Asymptomatic Women over 50 Years Old Selected by Ovarian Cancer Screening , 1999, Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.

[107]  L. Valentin,et al.  Comparison of ‘pattern recognition’ and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective cross validation , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.