Transabdominal Preperitoneal (rTAPP) Repair

The repair of ventral incisional hernia is commonly performed in daily surgical practice. For this purpose, the use of the laparoscopic technique has continued to evolve since its inception in 1991. Robotic assisted laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair is considered a new approach in the minimally invasive arena. Up to now, there are different planes are described for mesh positioning such as intraperitoneal, preperitoneal and retromuscular. The goal of extraperitoneal mesh positioning is to prevent adhesive complications. Furthermore, placing mesh in the preperitoneal space is more cost effective as compared to a tissue separating mesh which is used in intraperitoneal technique. Because it incorporates directly on fascia, it theoretically decreases the need for sutures or tack fixation. Preperitoneal dissection and mesh fixation in conventional laparoscopic approach technically may become challenging for surgeon. The da Vinci® robot (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) as an enabling tool, offers numerous advantages overall including 7° of freedom, three-dimensional (3D) imaging, and superior ergonomics that enable precise suturing and dissection at difficult angles. The main focus of this chapter is to explain the technicalities of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh placement for ventral incisional hernias.

[1]  A. Gonzalez,et al.  Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary closure versus no primary closure of the defect: potential benefits of the robotic technology , 2015, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[2]  B. Matthews,et al.  Prospective evaluation of adhesion characteristics to intraperitoneal mesh and adhesiolysis-related complications during laparoscopic re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[3]  J. Jeekel,et al.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions , 2015, Hernia.

[4]  R. Fanelli,et al.  SAGES guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[5]  O. Tantia,et al.  Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Ventral Hernia: A Step Towards Physiological Repair , 2011, The Indian journal of surgery.

[6]  D. Sanders,et al.  Nomenclature in Abdominal Wall Hernias: Is It Time for Consensus? , 2017, World Journal of Surgery.

[7]  D. Sanders,et al.  Prosthetic mesh materials used in hernia surgery , 2012, Expert review of medical devices.

[8]  K. Itani,et al.  Ventral Hernia Management: Expert Consensus Guided by Systematic Review , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[9]  A. Gonzalez,et al.  Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair: a multicenter evaluation of clinical outcomes , 2017, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  C. Avisse,et al.  Anatomy of the Abdominal Wall , 2001 .

[11]  S. Phillips,et al.  Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research , 2012, Hernia.

[12]  K. LeBlanc,et al.  Enterotomy and Mortality Rates of Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair: a Review of the Literature , 2007, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[13]  Julian A. Smith Sabiston. Textbook of Surgery: The Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice , 2002 .

[14]  D. Scott,et al.  Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. , 2013, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[15]  D. Lomanto,et al.  Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society [IEHS])—Part III , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  O. Kudsi,et al.  Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Transabdominal Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair. , 2018, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[17]  M. Love,et al.  Incisional Hernia Repair: Minimally Invasive Approaches. , 2018, The Surgical clinics of North America.