The Relation Between Brand-name Linguistic Characteristics and Brand-name Memory

Copytesting results from a commercial copytesting firm were used to assessthe relation between the presence of linguistic features in brand names and memory for those names. Brand names in the ads being tested (n = 480) were coded on 23 linguistic properties, of which 11 occurred with sufficient frequency to be retained for analysis. Regression analyses tested for the association between linguistic properties of the brand names and brand-name memory as a function ofbrand-name familiarity,controlling forexecutionalvariables.Resultsrevealed thatthree linguistic variableswerepositively related to brand-name memory (semantic appositeness, paranomasia, initial plosives), but only for less familiar brands. Two linguistic variablesshowed main effectsfor brand-name memory: unusual spelling (positive) and blending (negative). However, the effects for unusual spelling and blending were also qualified by the same interaction with familiarity: The effects were stronger for less familiar brands than they were for more familiar brands. These results are interpreted within Craik and Lockhart's (1972) depth of processing framework and implications for the naming of brands are discussed.

[1]  Tina M. Lowrey.  The Effects of Syntactic Complexity on Advertising Persuasiveness , 1998 .

[2]  Gerald Tehan,et al.  Phonological Similarity and Trace Degradation in the Serial Recall Task: When CAT helps RAT, but not MAN , 1999 .

[3]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Continuity between recall and recognition. , 1973 .

[4]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  On Resonance: A Critical Pluralistic Inquiry into Advertising Rhetoric , 1992 .

[5]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Encoding processes in recognition and recall , 1973 .

[6]  V. Gregg.  Word frequency, recognition and recall. , 1976 .

[7]  Robert J. Jarvella,et al.  Some linguistic determinants of word classification times , 1972 .

[8]  P. Muter.  Recognition and recall of words with a single meaning , 1984 .

[9]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phonological Priming by Masked Nonword Primes in the Lexical Decision Task , 1998 .

[10]  E. Tulving,et al.  Retrieval processes in recognition memory: Effects of associative context , 1971 .

[11]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[12]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[13]  Tomoyoshi Inoue.  Encoding Activities by Preschool Children under Orienting versus Learning Instructions--Are Onomatopoeias Associated with More Concrete Images? , 1991 .

[14]  Janeen Arnold Costa,et al.  The Winning Number: Consumer Perceptions of Alpha-Numeric Brand Names , 1993 .

[15]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[16]  C. Miles,et al.  Rhyme Attenuates the Auditory Suffix Effect: Alliteration Does Not , 1997 .

[17]  George M. Zinkhan,et al.  New brand names and inferential beliefs: Some insights on naming new products , 1987 .

[18]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Processing : A Framework for Memory Research 1 , 2005 .

[19]  Stanley S. Newman.  Further experiments in phonetic symbolism , 1933 .

[20]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[21]  John R. Anderson,et al.  RECOGNITION AND RETRIEVAL PROCESSES IN FREE RECALL , 1972 .

[22]  J. Fodor.  Psychology and Language. , 1970 .

[23]  Imagery and the recall of adjectives and nouns from meaningful prose , 1972 .

[24]  Catherine Z. Elgin,et al.  With reference to reference , 1983 .

[25]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of processing: A framework for memory research , 1972 .

[26]  Ira Schloss,et al.  Chickens and pickles. , 1981 .

[27]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Aesthetics and Psychobiology , 1975 .

[28]  R Treiman,et al.  Short-term memory errors for spoken syllables are affected by the linguistic structure of the syllables. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  P. M. Chisnall.  ALUMINIUM HOUSEHOLD FOIL IN THE COMMON MARKET: RESEARCH FOR AN EFFECTIVE BRAND NAME , 1974 .

[30]  W. James Potter,et al.  Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis , 1999 .

[31]  E. Sapir.  A study in phonetic symbolism. , 1929 .

[32]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  11 – Models for Free Recall and Recognition1 , 1970 .

[33]  Eric Yorkston,et al.  A Sound Idea: Phonetic Effects of Brand Names on Consumer Judgments , 2004 .

[34]  Keith Adler,et al.  Sound Advice on Brand Names , 1984 .

[35]  W. A. Scott,et al.  Reliability of Content Analysis ; The Case of Nominal Scale Cording , 1955 .

[36]  Mary T. Curren,et al.  How Does the Congruity of Brand Names Affect Evaluations of Brand Name Extensions , 1994 .

[37]  Madison Bentley,et al.  An accessory study of “phonetic symbolism” , 1933 .

[38]  Gordon H. Bower,et al.  Perceptual groups as coding units in immediate memory , 1972 .

[39]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[40]  I K TAYLOR,et al.  Phonetic symbolism re-examined. , 1963, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  R. Harris,et al.  Memory for metaphors and similes in discourse , 1999 .

[42]  Michael J. Cortese,et al.  Revisiting Serial Position Effects in Reading , 1998 .

[43]  Ryszard S. Michalski,et al.  Learning and Cognition , 1995, WOCFAI.

[44]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  The Effects of Brand Name Suggestiveness on Advertising Recall , 1998 .

[45]  G. Bower,et al.  A propositional theory of recognition memory , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[46]  G. B. Stern.  A name to conjure with , 1953 .

[47]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language , 1996 .