The potentials of and barriers to the utilization of advanced computer systems in remote construction projects: case of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

BackgroundAn extensive body of knowledge indicated the positive impact of the Advanced Computer based Management Systems (ACMS) on various aspects of project management, while highlighting barriers that hinder adoption, diffusion, and utilization of the ACMS by the construction industries around the world. Remote projects have their unique management problems and these are caused mainly by the remoteness of the project. Little research was undertaken concerning this issue, particularly in the Persian Gulf region, and it has highlighted few unique communications and management problems such as the loose control, lack of human resources, infrastructure and experience.MethodsThis research investigated the use of ACMS by large companies in the Eastern province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), and how it would help these companies sorting out a number of present projects’ management problems. Subsequently, a field study i.e. a questionnaire survey and interviews was carried out.ResultThe field study revealed significant association between frequent management problems with little use of ACMS and the domination of use of traditional communications and management systems. This paper argues that the use of traditional systems and the traditional way of sorting out construction problems limit the applicability of ACMS.ConclusionThe present researchers recommend the use of customized ACMS associated with the application of lean and sustainable management principals as these would help overcoming barriers and providing intelligent solution for the strategic, technical, and social issues of the remote construction sites.

[1]  Edward J. Jaselskis,et al.  Innovation in Construction Engineering Education Using Two Applications of Internet-Based Information Technology to Provide Real-Time Project Observations , 2011 .

[2]  Linda Kestle,et al.  Remote Site Design Management , 2009 .

[3]  BHZAD SIDAWI.  THE SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF REMOTE CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS , 2011 .

[4]  Yusuf Arayici,et al.  Building information modelling (BIM) implementation and remote construction projects: Issues, Challenges and Critiques , 2012, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[5]  David J. Grimshaw,et al.  Office automation in local government in the UK , 1989 .

[6]  Mustafa Alshawi,et al.  How Strategic is IT Investment in the Construction Industry? A UK Perspective , 2009 .

[7]  Bhzad Sidawi,et al.  Potential Use of Communications and Project Management Systems in Remote Construction Projects: The Case of Saudi Electric Company , 2012 .

[8]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Re-engineering construction communication in distance management framework , 2004, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[9]  Sonja Leskinen.  Mobile Solutions and the Construction Industry. Is it a working combination?: Master's thesis , 2006 .

[10]  A. T. Corish.  EUROPEAN CEMENT STANDARDS , 1990 .

[11]  Alessandro Margherita,et al.  ICT-enabled and process-based change: an integrative roadmap , 2010, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[12]  Miroslaw J. Skibniewski,et al.  Key success/failure factors and their impacts on system performance of web-based project management systems in construction , 2007, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[13]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  Integrated Sequential As-Built and As-Planned Representation with D4AR Tools in Support of Decision-Making Tasks in the AEC/FM Industry , 2011 .

[14]  Kerry London,et al.  Towards the development of a conceptual design management model for remote sites , 2002 .

[15]  Stephen Ison,et al.  Understanding structural and cultural impediments to ICT system integration , 2006 .

[16]  Patrick X.W. Zou,et al.  Different Perspectives Towards Using Web-Based Project Management Systems in Construction: Large Enterprises Versus Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises , 2005 .

[17]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[18]  Miroslaw J. Skibniewski,et al.  Success/Failure Factors and Performance Measures of Web-Based Construction Project Management Systems: Professionals’ Viewpoint , 2006 .

[19]  J. Barlow,et al.  Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects , 2000 .

[20]  Bassam Baroudi,et al.  CONSTRUCTION CHALLENGES IN REMOTE AUSTRALIAN LOCATIONS , 2010 .

[21]  Zeeshan Aziz,et al.  Technology strategies for globally dispersed construction teams , 2009, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[22]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  Evaluating web-based project information management in construction: capturing the long-term value creation process , 2004 .

[23]  Sonja Leskinen,et al.  Mobile Technology in the Finnish Construction Industry - Present Problems and Future Challenges , 2008, Bled eConference.

[24]  Ghassan Aouad,et al.  Building information modelling (BIM) for construction lifecycle management , 2010 .

[25]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  An application of the Internet-based project management system , 2001 .

[26]  Vanita Ahuja.  IT enhanced communication protocols for building project management by small and medium enterprises in the Indian construction industry , 2007 .

[27]  Núria Forcada Matheu.  Life cycle document management system for construction , 2005 .

[28]  Vanita Ahuja,et al.  Benefits of collaborative ICT adoption for building project management , 2009 .

[29]  Jay Yang,et al.  Managing Building Projects through Enhanced Communication - An ICT Based Strategy for Small and Medium Enterprises , 2007 .

[30]  Ekambaram Palaneeswaran,et al.  Web-based centralized multiclient cooperative contractor registration system , 2003 .

[31]  Mustafa Alshawi,et al.  Web-enabled project management: an emerging paradigm in construction , 2003 .

[32]  Sarah Bowden,et al.  Application of mobile IT in construction , 2005 .

[33]  Pollaphat Nitithamyong,et al.  Web-based construction project management systems: how to make them successful? , 2004 .