The impact of culture on crowd dynamics: an empirical approach

In agent-based social simulation, crowd models are used to generate agent behaviors that should correspond closely to human crowds. Despite significant progress in this area, many existing crowd models do not yet account for important cultural factors in crowd behavior, and even more so, for mixed-culture crowds. Moreover, evaluation of crowd models accounting for culture is particularly difficult, e.g., as controlled experiments are more difficult to set up, due to lack of subjects from different cultures. In this paper we examine the impact of cultural differences on crowd dynamics in pedestrian and evacuation domains. We account for micro-level cultural attributes: personal spaces, speed, pedestrian avoidance side and group formations. We then quantitatively validate the macro-level predictions of an agent-based simulation utilizing these against data from web-cam movies of human pedestrian crowds recorded in five different countries: Iraq, Israel, England, Canada and France. Using the validated simulations, we investigate the impact of each micro-level attribute on the resulting macro level behavior. We also examine the impact of mixed cultures on macro-level behavior. In the evacuation domain, we use an established simulation system to investigate cultural differences reported in the literature, and additionally explore the resulting macro level behavior.

[1]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Collective Information Processing and Pattern Formation in Swarms, Flocks, and Crowds , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Creating crowd variation with the OCEAN personality model , 2008, AAMAS.

[3]  D. Helbing Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems , 2000, cond-mat/0012229.

[4]  R. Levine,et al.  The Pace of Life in 31 Countries , 1999 .

[5]  Beatrice Eriksson,et al.  Cultural differences in an evacuation scenario - A study comparing Australian and Swedish responses , 2008 .

[6]  Catherine Beaulieu,et al.  Intercultural Study of Personal Space: A Case Study , 2004 .

[7]  A. Seyfried,et al.  Methods for measuring pedestrian density, flow, speed and direction with minimal scatter , 2009, 0911.2165.

[8]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Specification of the Social Force Pedestrian Model by Evolutionary Adjustment to Video Tracking Data , 2007, Adv. Complex Syst..

[9]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Controlling individual agents in high-density crowd simulation , 2007, SCA '07.

[10]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  PLEdestrians: a least-effort approach to crowd simulation , 2010, SCA '10.

[11]  Milind Tambe,et al.  ESCAPES: evacuation simulation with children, authorities, parents, emotions, and social comparison , 2011, AAMAS.

[12]  Victor J. Blue,et al.  Cellular Automata Microsimulation of Bidirectional Pedestrian Flows , 1999 .

[13]  Edward T. Hall,et al.  A System for the Notation of Proxemic Behavior1 , 1963 .

[14]  E. Hall,et al.  Understanding Cultural Differences , 1989 .

[15]  Natalie Fridman,et al.  Modeling pedestrian crowd behavior based on a cognitive model of social comparison theory , 2010, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[16]  Ana L. C. Bazzan,et al.  An agent-based simulation of pedestrian dynamics: from lane formation to auditorium evacuation , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[17]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Experimental Research of Pedestrian Walking Behavior , 2003 .

[18]  D. Helbing,et al.  The Walking Behaviour of Pedestrian Social Groups and Its Impact on Crowd Dynamics , 2010, PloS one.