3D probabilistic landslide run-out hazard evaluation for quantitative risk assessment purposes

Abstract The quantitative risk assessment of landslides requires the spatial impact probability of their run-out processes to conduct vulnerability assessments and prioritize mitigation measures. Hence, a general framework for three-dimensional (3D) probabilistic landslide run-out hazard evaluation is presented in this paper. In the proposed framework, a continuum mechanics concept-based dynamic numerical model, called Massflow, is used to conduct run-out analyses. A multi-observation Bayesian back analysis method with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation is used to calibrate the uncertainties of the input parameters based on a past landslide event, which integrates the prior information, observation information, and model bias factor to yield posterior distributions of the input parameters. Then, the posterior distributions are used as inputs for a future event to estimate the exceedance probabilities of run-out intensities (i.e., maximum run-out height and velocity) on a 3D terrain and produce run-out hazard maps for quantitative landslide risk assessments purposes. To improve the computational efficiency of the proposed framework without losing accuracy, a multi-response Kriging-based surrogate model with a sequential adaptive sampling strategy is developed for both the back analysis and forward prediction. Finally, two sequential slides of landslide CJ#8 located in the Heifangtai terrain, Gansu, China are employed to test the performance of the proposed framework, with its advantages and potential drawbacks discussed in detail. Results show that the proposed framework can effectively calibrate the model input parameters to evaluate the run-out hazard of similar landslides, and the predicted results can be employed in landslide risk assessments and mitigations.

[1]  Xing Qi,et al.  Analysis of retrogressive loess flowslides in Heifangtai, China , 2017 .

[2]  Haitao Liu,et al.  A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design , 2017, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[3]  Jerome Sacks,et al.  Choosing the Sample Size of a Computer Experiment: A Practical Guide , 2009, Technometrics.

[4]  Guannan Zhang,et al.  A Taylor Expansion‐Based Adaptive Design Strategy for Global Surrogate Modeling With Applications in Groundwater Modeling , 2017 .

[5]  Bin Zhang,et al.  A statistics-based discrete element modeling method coupled with the strength reduction method for the stability analysis of jointed rock slopes , 2020 .

[6]  Marcus I. Bursik,et al.  Input uncertainty propagation methods and hazard mapping of geophysical mass flows , 2006 .

[7]  B. Calvo,et al.  A real-world application of Monte Carlo procedure for debris flow risk assessment , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[8]  Jyr‐Ching Hu,et al.  Forecasting landslide hazard by the 3D discrete element method: A case study of the unstable slope in the Lushan hot spring district, central Taiwan , 2014 .

[9]  Fuchu Dai,et al.  Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview , 2002 .

[10]  C. Juang,et al.  Geohazards and human settlements: Lessons learned from multiple relocation events in Badong, China – Engineering geologist's perspective , 2021 .

[11]  Dylan Wood,et al.  Bayesian calibration of multi-response systems via multivariate Kriging: Methodology and geological and geotechnical case studies , 2019, Engineering Geology.

[12]  Yang Sun,et al.  Bayesian updating for progressive excavation of high rock slopes using multi-type monitoring data , 2019, Engineering Geology.

[13]  Dianqing Li,et al.  Investigation of slope failure mode evolution during large deformation in spatially variable soils by random limit equilibrium and material point methods , 2019, Computers and Geotechnics.

[14]  Yu Huang,et al.  Stochastic assessment of slope failure run-out triggered by earthquake ground motion , 2020, Natural Hazards.

[15]  Peng Zeng,et al.  From probabilistic back analyses to probabilistic run-out predictions of landslides: A case study of Heifangtai terrace, Gansu Province, China , 2021 .

[16]  Liang Gao,et al.  An active learning reliability method combining Kriging constructed with exploration and exploitation of failure region and subset simulation , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Back analysis of slope failure with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation , 2010 .

[18]  Qiang Xu,et al.  3D numerical modeling using smoothed particle hydrodynamics of flow-like landslide propagation triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake , 2014 .

[19]  G. L. Sivakumar Babu,et al.  Probabilistic back analysis of rainfall induced landslide‐ A case study of Malin landslide, India , 2016 .

[20]  Qiang Xu,et al.  Distribution and failure modes of the landslides in Heitai terrace, China , 2017 .

[21]  Suzanne Lacasse,et al.  Learning to Live with Geohazards: From Research to Practice , 2011 .

[22]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011 .

[23]  Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al.  Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation , 2008 .

[24]  Fabio Gabrieli,et al.  A new data assimilation procedure to develop a debris flow run-out model , 2016, Landslides.

[25]  Søren Nymand Lophaven,et al.  DACE - A Matlab Kriging Toolbox, Version 2.0 , 2002 .

[26]  Qiang Xu,et al.  Comparison of data-driven models of loess landslide runout distance estimation , 2019, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment.

[27]  Jichun Wu,et al.  An adaptive Kriging surrogate method for efficient uncertainty quantification with an application to geological carbon sequestration modeling , 2019, Comput. Geosci..

[28]  Leandro R. Alejano,et al.  Reliability-based design for debris flow barriers , 2019, Landslides.

[29]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[30]  A. Troncone,et al.  Post-failure analysis of the Maierato landslide using the material point method , 2020 .

[32]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[33]  Jae-Woo Lee,et al.  Efficient multi-response adaptive sampling algorithm for construction of variable-fidelity aerodynamic tables , 2019, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics.

[34]  J. Cepeda,et al.  Procedure for the selection of runout model parameters from landslide back-analyses: application to the Metropolitan Area of San Salvador, El Salvador , 2010 .

[35]  Marina Pirulli,et al.  From back-analysis to run-out prediction: a case study in the Western Italian Alps , 2011 .

[36]  Victor Mwango Bowa,et al.  Probabilistic analysis of a discrete element modelling of the runout behavior of the Jiweishan landslide , 2021, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics.

[37]  Hongwei Huang,et al.  Bayesian Updating of Soil Parameters for Braced Excavations Using Field Observations , 2013 .

[38]  E. M. Lee,et al.  Landslide risk assessment: the challenge of communicating uncertainty to decision-makers , 2015 .

[39]  Farrokh Nadim,et al.  Reliability of Slopes in Sensitive Clays , 2017 .

[40]  Xin Liu,et al.  Probabilistic analysis of post-failure behavior of soil slopes using random smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2019, Engineering Geology.

[41]  Scott McDougall,et al.  Two methodologies to calibrate landslide runout models , 2019, Landslides.

[42]  Xinyu Shao,et al.  A novel sequential exploration-exploitation sampling strategy for global metamodeling , 2015 .

[43]  Weijie Zhang,et al.  Spatial variability effect of internal friction angle on the post-failure behavior of landslides using a random and non-Newtonian fluid based SPH method , 2020 .

[44]  Robin Chowdhury,et al.  Role of slope reliability analysis in landslide risk management , 2003 .

[45]  Yu Luo,et al.  A MacCormack-TVD finite difference method to simulate the mass flow in mountainous terrain with variable computational domain , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[46]  K. Allstadt,et al.  Landslide mobility and hazards: implications of the 2014 Oso disaster , 2015 .

[47]  Peng Zeng,et al.  Run-out distance exceedance probability evaluation and hazard zoning of an individual landslide , 2020, Landslides.

[48]  Hongbo Zhao,et al.  Probabilistic back analysis based on Bayesian and multi-output support vector machine for a high cut rock slope , 2016 .

[49]  Lulu Zhang,et al.  Probabilistic calibration of a coupled hydro-mechanical slope stability model with integration of multiple observations , 2018 .

[50]  Michele Calvello,et al.  The role of observations in the inverse analysis of landslide propagation , 2017 .

[51]  J. Malet,et al.  Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk , 2013, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment.

[52]  Scott McDougall,et al.  2014 Canadian Geotechnical Colloquium: Landslide runout analysis — current practice and challenges , 2017 .

[53]  Selen Cremaschi,et al.  Adaptive sequential sampling for surrogate model generation with artificial neural networks , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[54]  Nico De Koker,et al.  Assessment of reliability-based design of stable slopes , 2019, Canadian Geotechnical Journal.