Immersive Virtual Reality Feedback in a Brain Computer Interface for Upper Limb Rehabilitation

Visual feedback in a brain computer interface (BCI) influences significantly in its performance; but when this BCI will be applied in a rehabilitation therapy for post stroke patients, it will be a determining factor to enhance the neuroplasticity process. Many studies have demonstrated the efficiency of virtual reality (VR) in a BCI, motor cortex increases its activation levels due to be an immersive environment for the subject; specifically, a BCI based on motor imagery (MI) with VR feedback has positive effects in patients. This work proposes to apply a BCI with VR to support an upper limb rehabilitation therapy for post stroke patients, but it has been tested with eighteen healthy subjects, they performed MI tasks of flexion and extension of their arms, then they could see a virtual arm in 3D performing the same requested movement. Comparison of power spectral density (PSD) estimation is done during MI tasks in training and online test sessions, and feedback in online test sessions; and it is possible to observe the brain activity in alpha and beta bands remained during online sessions, topographic map shows activated premotor and motor cortex areas, it is significant evidence for the application of this system to motor disable patients.

[1]  S. Crowe,et al.  Changes to Body Image and Self-esteem following Stroke in Young Adults , 2000 .

[2]  Rupert Ortner,et al.  A Motor Imagery Based Brain-Computer Interface for Stroke Rehabilitation , 2012, Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine.

[3]  Javier Andreu-Perez,et al.  Performance predictors of motor imagery brain-computer interface based on spatial abilities for upper limb rehabilitation , 2017, 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[4]  Mahdi Bamdad,et al.  Application of BCI systems in neurorehabilitation: a scoping review , 2015, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[5]  M. Fornage,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2017, Circulation.

[6]  Akio Kimura,et al.  Brain-computer interface with somatosensory feedback improves functional recovery from severe hemiplegia due to chronic stroke , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[7]  Simon Driver,et al.  Virtual Reality and Brain Computer Interface in Neurorehabilitation , 2016, Proceedings.

[8]  Trieu Phat Luu,et al.  Gait adaptation to visual kinematic perturbations using a real-time closed-loop brain–computer interface to a virtual reality avatar , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  V. Caggiano,et al.  Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  Athanasios Vourvopoulos,et al.  Motor priming in virtual reality can augment motor-imagery training efficacy in restorative brain-computer interaction: a within-subject analysis , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Vibrotactile Feedback for Brain-Computer Interface Operation , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[12]  A. M. Pettersen,et al.  Subjective well-being one year after stroke , 1997, Clinical rehabilitation.

[13]  Maureen Clerc,et al.  A study on the effect of Electrical Stimulation during motor imagery learning in Brain-computer interfacing , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[14]  A. Prevo,et al.  The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[15]  V. Feigin,et al.  Prevention, management, and rehabilitation of stroke in low- and middle-income countries , 2016, eNeurologicalSci.

[16]  Javier Andreu-Perez,et al.  A virtual reality and brain computer interface system for upper limb rehabilitation of post stroke patients , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[17]  S. Kranz Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Subjects: Relationships between the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Domains , 2012 .