Predicting human olfactory perception from chemical features of odor molecules

How will this molecule smell? We still do not understand what a given substance will smell like. Keller et al. launched an international crowd-sourced competition in which many teams tried to solve how the smell of a molecule will be perceived by humans. The teams were given access to a database of responses from subjects who had sniffed a large number of molecules and been asked to rate each smell across a range of different qualities. The teams were also given a comprehensive list of the physical and chemical features of the molecules smelled. The teams produced algorithms to predict the correspondence between the quality of each smell and a given molecule. The best models that emerged from this challenge could accurately predict how a new molecule would smell. Science, this issue p. 820 Results of a crowdsourcing competition show that it is possible to accurately predict and reverse-engineer the smell of a molecule. It is still not possible to predict whether a given molecule will have a perceived odor or what olfactory percept it will produce. We therefore organized the crowd-sourced DREAM Olfaction Prediction Challenge. Using a large olfactory psychophysical data set, teams developed machine-learning algorithms to predict sensory attributes of molecules based on their chemoinformatic features. The resulting models accurately predicted odor intensity and pleasantness and also successfully predicted 8 among 19 rated semantic descriptors (“garlic,” “fish,” “sweet,” “fruit,” “burnt,” “spices,” “flower,” and “sour”). Regularized linear models performed nearly as well as random forest–based ones, with a predictive accuracy that closely approaches a key theoretical limit. These models help to predict the perceptual qualities of virtually any molecule with high accuracy and also reverse-engineer the smell of a molecule.

[1]  M. Chastrette,et al.  Molecular complexity determines the number of olfactory notes and the pleasantness of smells , 2011, Scientific reports.

[2]  A Dravnieks,et al.  Odor quality: semantically generated multidimensional profiles are stable. , 1982, Science.

[3]  Andreas Keller,et al.  Olfactory perception of chemically diverse molecules , 2016, BMC Neuroscience.

[4]  Sanne Boesveldt,et al.  Carbon chain length and the stimulus problem in olfaction , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[5]  Peter C. Jurs,et al.  Correlation of odor intensities with structural properties of odorants , 1989 .

[6]  M. Laska,et al.  Olfactory discrimination ability for homologous series of aliphatic alcohols and aldehydes. , 1999, Chemical senses.

[7]  C. Sell,et al.  On the unpredictability of odor. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[8]  Kush R. Varshney,et al.  Olfactory signal processing , 2014, Digit. Signal Process..

[9]  A. Dravnieks,et al.  Atlas of odor character profiles , 1992 .

[10]  Arvind Ramanathan,et al.  Categorical Dimensions of Human Odor Descriptor Space Revealed by Non-Negative Matrix Factorization , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Guillermo A. Cecchi,et al.  Noise-Driven Causal Inference in Biomolecular Networks , 2015, PloS one.

[12]  David Rogers,et al.  Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[13]  Dmitry Rinberg,et al.  In search of the structure of human olfactory space. , 2011, Frontiers in systems neuroscience.

[14]  H. Boelens,et al.  Structure—activity relationships in chemoreception by human olfaction , 1983 .

[15]  Noam Sobel,et al.  Predicting odor perceptual similarity from odor structure. , 2013, PLoS computational biology.

[16]  Manuel Zarzo,et al.  Hedonic Judgments of Chemical Compounds Are Correlated with Molecular Size , 2011, Sensors.

[17]  R. Khan,et al.  Predicting Odor Pleasantness from Odorant Structure: Pleasantness as a Reflection of the Physical World , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Olfactory bulb coding of odors, mixtures and sniffs is a linear sum of odor time profiles , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.