Using tablets in medical consultations: Single loop and double loop learning processes

ObjectiveThis paper investigates the influence of using tablet in waiting rooms and medical examinations on how physicians give information and how patients learn. It further assesses the factors that impact patient satisfaction. MethodsPatients and physicians in a primary care clinic were given a tablet device to search for health information in the waiting room, and when interacting with the physician, while physicians used the tablet device to share information with patients during the medical consultation. 82 patients completed a 'pre' survey on using tablets to search for health related information and a 'post' survey after their visit. Structural equation modeling was employed to analyze patient's perceptions. ResultsTablet use during consultation has a negative effect on patients' perceptions of physician information giving, but using the tablet in the waiting room has a positive impact on patient learning, perceptions of physicians' information giving and patient satisfaction. ConclusionsThis study indicates the importance of tablet use in ensuring information giving and patient learning. It further highlights the potential for tablets to promote single-loop learning in the medical encounter by better preparing patients for the physician's information giving. Tablets also enable double-loop learning, which leads to greater patient satisfaction. Use of tablet computers before and during medical consultations.Tablet use as a means of promoting single-loop and double-loop learning.Increasing patient satisfaction during medical consultations.Patients' perceptions of the information they receive when seeking medical advice.

[1]  Rob Sanson-Fisher,et al.  Patient-reported areas for quality improvement in general practice: a cross-sectional survey. , 2015, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[2]  Gary McCord,et al.  Assessing the Impact on Patient–Physician Interaction When Physicians Use Personal Digital Assistants: A Northeastern Ohio Network (NEON®) Study , 2009, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[3]  Xi Zhang,et al.  A mapping analytic approach to trace development of multidisciplinary research field , 2015 .

[4]  Dominik Aronsky,et al.  The effect of physician triage on emergency department length of stay. , 2010, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[5]  M T Dobal,et al.  Filling the waiting time in the clinic with education about glaucoma. , 2001, Insight.

[6]  L. George,et al.  Health promotion in primary care: a survey of U.S. family practitioners. , 1985, Preventive medicine.

[7]  Susan Hassmiller,et al.  Validating a Health Consumer Segmentation Model: Behavioral and Attitudinal Differences in Disease Prevention-Related Practices , 2010, Journal of health communication.

[8]  H. C. Coumou,et al.  How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[9]  Jie Huang,et al.  Research Paper: Health Information Technology and Physician-Patient Interactions: Impact of Computers on Communication during Outpatient Primary Care Visits , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Doctors in a wired world: can professionalism survive connectivity? , 2002, The Milbank quarterly.

[11]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Studies of doctor-patient interaction. , 1989, Annual review of public health.

[12]  Ben-Tzion Karsh,et al.  Development of a primary care physician task list to evaluate clinic visit workflow , 2011, BMJ quality & safety.

[13]  E. Carmines,et al.  Analyzing models with unobserved variables: analysis of covariance structures , 1981 .

[14]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[15]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Compliance in Health Care , 1979 .

[16]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[17]  B. Paterson,et al.  Non‐attendance in chronic disease clinics: a matter of non‐compliance? , 2010 .

[18]  M. Ebell,et al.  Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  N. Ahuja,et al.  The Smartphone in Medicine: A Review of Current and Potential Use Among Physicians and Students , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[20]  Timothy Dy Aungst,et al.  Medical Applications for Pharmacists Using Mobile Devices , 2013, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[21]  Johanna I Westbrook,et al.  The Impact of an Online Evidence System on Confidence in Decision Making in a Controlled Setting , 2005, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[22]  Illhoi Yoo,et al.  A Systematic Review of Healthcare Applications for Smartphones , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[23]  E. Deci,et al.  The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality , 1985 .

[24]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1974 .

[25]  John G Meara,et al.  Applying surgical apps: Smartphone and tablet apps prove useful in clinical practice. , 2013, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[26]  S. Rudkin,et al.  Personal digital assistants change management more often than paper texts and foster patient confidence , 2006, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[27]  J Sobal,et al.  Health promotion: physicians' beliefs, attitudes, and practices. , 1986, American journal of preventive medicine.

[28]  Jin-Hong Yoo The Meaning of Information Technology (IT) Mobile Devices to Me, the Infectious Disease Physician , 2013, Infection & chemotherapy.

[29]  Mark D. Schwartz,et al.  Computers in the Exam Room: Differences in Physician–Patient Interaction May Be Due to Physician Experience , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[30]  Xi Zhang,et al.  Mapping the Impact of Social Media and Mobile Internet on Chinese Academia's Performance: A Case on Telemedicine Research 2005-2013 , 2014, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[31]  Jonathan White,et al.  ‘It's on my iPhone’: attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study , 2012, BMJ Open.

[32]  Hao Wang,et al.  Mobile Phone Based Health Care Technology , 2009 .

[33]  R. L. Davison Involving Doctors in Health Education About Cancer , 1980, British Journal of Cancer.

[34]  Karl Gaffney,et al.  Patient satisfaction with rheumatology practitioner clinics: can we achieve concordance by meeting patients' information needs and encouraging participatory decision making? , 2007, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[35]  R P Russell,et al.  Five-year blood pressure control and mortality following health education for hypertensive patients. , 1983, American journal of public health.

[36]  Michael D. Coovert,et al.  An evaluation of medical residents utilization of tablet computers , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  Jenny Field,et al.  General practitioners' perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey , 1998, BMJ.

[38]  Karen Hughes Miller,et al.  Why Physicians Should Share PDA/Smartphone Findings With Their Patients: A Brief Report , 2012, Journal of health communication.

[39]  P D Mullen,et al.  Clinical trials of patient education for chronic conditions: a comparative meta-analysis of intervention types. , 1985, Preventive medicine.

[40]  Patricia Dolan Mullen,et al.  Educating and Counseling for Prevention: From Theory and Research to Principles , 1990 .

[41]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[42]  Orrin I. Franko,et al.  Smartphone App Use Among Medical Providers in ACGME Training Programs , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[43]  Keith A. Markus,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling by Rex B. Kline , 2012 .

[44]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[45]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1974 .

[46]  K. Dansky,et al.  Patient satisfaction with ambulatory healthcare services: waiting time and filling time. , 1997, Hospital & health services administration.

[47]  Lawrence W. Green,et al.  Health Education Planning: A Diagnostic Approach , 1979 .

[48]  Susan Eggly,et al.  Measuring the use of examination room time in oncology clinics: a novel approach to assessing clinic efficiency and patient flow. , 2014, Journal of oncology practice.

[49]  Margo Brewer,et al.  Interprofessional Practice-Based Education , 2012 .

[50]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[51]  L. Pederson,et al.  Compliance with physician advice to quit smoking: a review of the literature. , 1982, Preventive medicine.

[52]  J. Stamler,et al.  Prevention and control of hypertension by nutritional-hygienic means. Long-term experience of the Chicago Coronary Prevention Evaluation Program. , 1980, JAMA.

[53]  J. Jamison PATIENT SATISFACTION , 1996, Australasian Chiropractic & Osteopathy.

[54]  C. Kelly,et al.  Student's perceptions of effective clinical teaching revisited. , 2007, Nurse education today.

[55]  Gregory M Garrison,et al.  21st-century health care: the effect of computer use by physicians on patient satisfaction at a family medicine clinic. , 2002, Family medicine.

[56]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Inaccuracies in physicians' perceptions of their patients. , 1999, Medical care.

[57]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[58]  Grant T. Savage,et al.  Impact of Patient Feedback on Residents' Handheld Computer Use: A Multi-Site Study , 2004, MedInfo.

[59]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[60]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  Using the computer in the clinical consultation; setting the stage, reviewing, recording, and taking actions: multi-channel video study. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.