Uniform multidrug therapy for leprosy patients in Brazil (U-MDT/CT-BR): Results of an open label, randomized and controlled clinical trial, among multibacillary patients

Background Leprosy control is based on early diagnosis and multidrug therapy. For treatment purposes, leprosy patients can be classified as paucibacillary (PB) or multibacillary (MB), according to the number of skin lesions. Studies regarding a uniform treatment regimen (U-MDT) for all leprosy patients have been encouraged by the WHO, rendering disease classification unnecessary. Methodology and findings An independent, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted from 2007 to 2015 in Brazil, compared main outcomes (frequency of reactions, bacilloscopic index trend, disability progression and relapse rates) among MB patients treated with a uniform regimen/U-MDT (dapsone+rifampicin+clofazimine for six months) versus WHO regular-MDT/R-MDT (dapsone+rifampicin+clofazimine for 12 months). A total of 613 newly diagnosed, untreated MB patients with high bacterial load were included. There was no statistically significant difference in Kaplan-Meyer survival function regarding reaction or disability progression among patients in the U-MDT and R-MDT groups, with more than 25% disability progression in both groups. The full mixed effects model adjusted for the bacilloscopic index average trend in time showed no statistically significant difference for the regression coefficient in both groups and for interaction variables that included treatment group. During active follow up, four patients in U-MDT group relapsed representing a relapse rate of 2.6 per 1000 patients per year of active follow up (95% CI [0·81, 6·2] per 1000). During passive follow up three patients relapsed in U-MDT and one in R-MTD. As this period corresponds to passive follow up, sensitivity analysis estimated the relapse rate for the entire follow up period between 2·9- and 4·5 per 1000 people per year. Conclusion Our results on the first randomized and controlled study on U-MDT together with the results from three previous studies performed in China, India and Bangladesh, support the hypothesis that UMDT is an acceptable option to be adopted in endemic countries to treat leprosy patients in the field worldwide. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00669643

[1]  K. Alam,et al.  Outcome of 6 months MBMDT in MB patients in Bangladesh- preliminary results. , 2016, Leprosy review.

[2]  R. Asia Global Leprosy Strategy 2016–2020. Accelerating towards a leprosy-free world. Monitoring and Evaluation Guide , 2016 .

[3]  Liangbin Yan,et al.  Six years' follow‐up of multibacillary leprosy patients treated with uniform multi‐drug therapy in China , 2015, International journal of dermatology.

[4]  M. A. Pontes,et al.  Results from the clinical trial of uniform multidrug therapy for leprosy patients in Brazil (U-MDT/CT-BR): decrease in bacteriological index. , 2014, Leprosy review.

[5]  M. R. F. de Oliveira,et al.  Patient profile and treatment satisfaction of Brazilian leprosy patients in a clinical trial of uniform six-month multidrug therapy (U-MDT/CT-BR). , 2014, Leprosy review.

[6]  M. Penna Considerations in the design of clinical trials for multibacillary leprosy treatment , 2014 .

[7]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Twelve months fixed duration WHO multidrug therapy for multibacillary leprosy: incidence of relapses in Agra field based cohort study , 2013, The Indian journal of medical research.

[8]  E. Sarno,et al.  Progression of leprosy disability after discharge: is multidrug therapy enough? , 2013, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[9]  M. A. Pontes,et al.  A clinical trial for uniform multidrug therapy for leprosy patients in Brazil: rationale and design. , 2012, Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz.

[10]  M. A. Pontes,et al.  Primary results of clinical trial for uniform multidrug therapy for leprosy patients in Brazil (U-MDT/CT-BR): reactions frequency in multibacillary patients. , 2012, Leprosy review.

[11]  J. Grosset,et al.  The chemotherapy of leprosy: an interpretive history. , 2012, Leprosy review.

[12]  B. Arana,et al.  Bacteriological results and leprosy reactions among MB leprosy patients treated with uniform multidrug therapy in China. , 2012, Leprosy review.

[13]  R. Abalos,et al.  Reactions following completion of 1 and 2 year multidrug therapy (MDT). , 2010, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[14]  Jian-ping Shen,et al.  International open trial of uniform multi‐drug therapy regimen for 6 months for all types of leprosy patients: rationale, design and preliminary results , 2008, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[15]  P. Saunderson,et al.  International workshop on neuropathology in leprosy--consensus report. , 2007, Leprosy review.

[16]  D. Lockwood,et al.  Leprosy: too complex a disease for a simple elimination paradigm. , 2005, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[17]  E. Declercq,et al.  Rate and time distribution of relapses in multibacillary leprosy. , 1989, International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association.

[18]  J. Languillon,et al.  ONCE-MONTHLY RIFAMPICIN PLUS DAILY DAPSONE IN INITIAL TREATMENT OF LEPROMATOUS LEPROSY , 1982, The Lancet.

[19]  P. Fine Leprosy: the epidemiology of a slow bacterium. , 1982, Epidemiologic reviews.

[20]  J. Grosset Bacteriologic basis of short-course chemotherapy for tuberculosis. , 1980, Clinics in chest medicine.

[21]  D. Ridley,et al.  Classification of leprosy according to immunity. A five-group system. , 1966, International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases : official organ of the International Leprosy Association.