Nitrogen and phosphorus changes and optimal drainage time of flooded paddy field based on environmental factors

Abstract While many controlled irrigation and drainage techniques have been adopted in China, the environmental effects of these techniques require further investigation. This study was conducted to examine the changes of nitrogen and phosphorus of a flooded paddy water system after fertilizer application and at each growth stage so as to obtain the optimal drainage time at each growth stage. Four treatments with different water level management methods at each growth stage were conducted under the condition of ten-day continuous flooding. Results show that the ammonia nitrogen (NH + 4 -N ) concentration reached the peak value once the fertilizer was applied, and then decreased to a relatively low level seven to ten days later, and that the nitrate nitrogen (NO - 3 -N) concentration gradually rose to its peak value, which appeared later in subsurface water than in surface water. Continuous flooding could effectively reduce the concentrations of NH + 4 -N, NO - 3 -N , and total phosphorus (TP) in surface water. However, the paddy water disturbance, in the process of soil surface adsorption and nitrification, caused NH + 4 -N to be released and increased the concentrations of NH + 4 -N and NO - 3 -N in surface water. A multi-objective controlled drainage model based on environmental factors was established in order to obtain the optimal drainage time at each growth stage and better guide the drainage practices of farmers. The optimal times for surface drainage are the fourth, sixth, fifth, and sixth days after flooding at the tillering, jointing-booting, heading-flowering, and milking stages, respectively.

[1]  Zhijian Zhang,et al.  Ammonia volatilization from urea in rice fields with zero-drainage water management , 2008 .

[2]  Jie-sheng Huang,et al.  Experimental study on the distribution of soil nitrate and ammonium nitrogen under controlled drainage , 2009, Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences.

[3]  R. W. Skaggs,et al.  Hydrologic and water quality impacts of agricultural drainage , 1994 .

[4]  Yin Guo-xi Experimental study on effect of controlled drainage from ground surface on concentration and discharge of nitrogen , 2006 .

[5]  C. Drury,et al.  Controlled drainage and subirrigation influences tile nitrate loss and corn yields in a sandy loam soil in Southwestern Ontario , 2002 .

[6]  Xin-ping Chen,et al.  Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  R. Wayne Skaggs,et al.  Controlled versus Conventional Drainage Effects on Water Quality , 1995 .

[8]  P. Ambus,et al.  Emissions of nitrous oxide from arable organic and conventional cropping systems on two soil types , 2010 .

[9]  C. Madramootoo,et al.  Influence of water table and nitrogen management on residual soil NO3- and denitrification rate under corn production in sandy loam soil in Quebec , 2000 .

[10]  Zhulu Lin,et al.  Hydrologic and water-quality impacts of agricultural land use changes incurred from bioenergy policies , 2015 .

[11]  Ying-xin Xie,et al.  Assessment of Nitrogen Pollutant Sources in Surface Waters of Taihu Lake Region , 2007 .

[12]  Chen Xi-bao Nitrogen losses from farm runoff under simulated rainfall conditions , 2001 .

[13]  G. Drecht,et al.  Nitrate leaching in agriculture to upper groundwater in the sandy regions of the Netherlands during the 1992–1995 period , 2005, Environmental monitoring and assessment.