Are philosophers expert intuiters?

Recent experimental philosophy arguments have raised trouble for philosophers’ reliance on armchair intuitions. One popular line of response has been the expertise defense: philosophers are highly-trained experts, whereas the subjects in the experimental philosophy studies have generally been ordinary undergraduates, and so there's no reason to think philosophers will make the same mistakes. But this deploys a substantive empirical claim, that philosophers’ training indeed inculcates sufficient protection from such mistakes. We canvass the psychological literature on expertise, which indicates that people are not generally very good at reckoning who will develop expertise under what circumstances. We consider three promising hypotheses concerning what philosophical expertise might consist in: (i) better conceptual schemata; (ii) mastery of entrenched theories; and (iii) general practical know-how with the entertaining of hypotheticals. On inspection, none seem to provide us with good reason to endorse this key empirical premise of the expertise defense.

[1]  D. Kuhn.  Children and adults as intuitive scientists. , 1989, Psychological review.

[2]  W. Heath.  The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies , 2008 .

[3]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance , 2006 .

[4]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Toward a general theory of expertise : prospects and limits , 1991 .

[5]  Neil Charness,et al.  Expertise in chess: The balance between knowledge and search. , 1991 .

[6]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Procedural knowledge in molecular biology , 2003 .

[7]  E. Machery.  Doing without Concepts , 2009 .

[8]  L. Schauble,et al.  Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. , 1994 .

[9]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Studies of Expertise from Psychological Perspectives , 2006 .

[10]  James F. Voss,et al.  Text Processing of Domain-Related Information for Individuals with High and Low Domain Knowledge: Methodological Considerations. , 1979 .

[11]  Simon Cullen.  Survey-Driven Romanticism , 2010 .

[12]  Kevin W. Eva,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: Expertise in Medicine and Surgery , 2006 .

[13]  H. Garb,et al.  Clinical judgment, clinical training, and professional experience. , 1989, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  P. Singer.  Ethics and Experts. 1. How do we decide? , 1982, The Hastings Center report.

[15]  Winston R. Sieck,et al.  The recalcitrance of overconfidence and its contribution to decision aid neglect , 2005 .

[16]  J. Sytsma,et al.  A New Perspective Concerning Experiments on Semantic Intuitions , 2011 .

[17]  James Myers,et al.  Syntactic Judgment Experiments , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[18]  Steven D. Hales.  Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy , 2006 .

[19]  T. Williamson.  I —ARMCHAIR PHILOSOPHY, METAPHYSICAL MODALITY AND COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING* , 2005 .

[20]  William Labov.  When Intuitions Fail , 2003 .

[21]  Max Deutsch,et al.  Experimental Philosophy and the Theory of Reference , 2009 .

[22]  K. VanLehn,et al.  Cognitive skill acquisition. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.

[24]  J. Weinberg.  How to Challenge Intuitions Empirically Without Risking Skepticism , 2007 .

[25]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  On the Role of Biomedical Knowledge in Clinical Reasoning by Experts, Intermediates and Novices , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  D. Ariely,et al.  “Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences , 2003 .

[27]  Carson T. Schütze.  The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology , 1998 .

[28]  Y. Anzai.  Learning and use of representations for physics expertise , 1991 .

[29]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance , 2006 .

[30]  A. D. D. Groot.  Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .

[31]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Recognition memory performance and residential burglary , 1992 .

[32]  E. Sosa.  A Defense of the Use of Intuitions in Philosophy , 2009 .

[33]  K. Ludwig.  The Epistemology of Thought Experiments: First Person versus Third Person Approaches , 2007 .

[34]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[35]  De Groot,et al.  Thought and choice in chess, 2nd ed. , 1978 .

[36]  Michael Devitt,et al.  Intuitions In Linguistics , 2006, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[37]  Shaun Nichols,et al.  VARIATIONS IN ETHICAL INTUITIONS , 2009 .

[38]  H. Schmidt,et al.  A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implication [published erratum appears in Acad Med 1992 Apr;67(4):287] , 1990, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[39]  C. Phillips.  Should we impeach armchair linguists ? , 2022 .

[40]  Frank Jackson.  From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis , 2001 .

[41]  Karola Stotz,et al.  Genes: philosophical analyses put to the test. , 2004, History and philosophy of the life sciences.

[42]  S. Stich,et al.  Semantics, cross-cultural style , 2004, Cognition.

[43]  Order Effects And The Audit Materiality Revision Choice , 2011 .

[44]  C. Pollard,et al.  Center for the Study of Language and Information , 2022 .

[45]  James Shanteau,et al.  Why study expert decision making? Some historical perspectives and comments. , 1992 .

[46]  Colleen M. Zeitz,et al.  Expert-Novice Differences in Memory, Abstraction, and Reasoning in the Domain of Literature , 1994 .

[47]  T. Wilson.  Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious , 2002 .

[48]  John R. Anderson.  Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[49]  A. Goldman.  PHILOSOPHICAL INTUITIONS: THEIR TARGET, THEIR SOURCE, AND THEIR EPISTEMIC STATUS , 2007 .

[50]  Colin Camerer,et al.  The process-performance paradox in expert judgment - How can experts know so much and predict so badly? , 1991 .

[51]  J. Weinberg,et al.  Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions , 2001 .

[52]  J. E. Tschirgi,et al.  Sensible reasoning: A hypothesis about hypotheses. , 1980 .

[53]  Peter Miller.  Who are the Moral Experts , 1975 .

[54]  Paul L. Walker,et al.  The effects of instruction and experience on the acquisition of auditing knowledge , 1994 .

[55]  Silent invasion: Imanishi's primatology and cultural bias in science. , 2003, Animal cognition.

[56]  J. Shanteau.  Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics , 1992 .

[57]  F. Gobet,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance , 2006 .

[58]  Frederick Reif,et al.  Cognition for Interpreting Scientific Concepts: A Study of Acceleration , 1992 .

[59]  William Labov,et al.  Empirical Foundations of Linguistic Theory , 1975 .

[60]  Joshua Alexander,et al.  Analytic epistemology and experimental philosophy , 2007 .

[61]  Joshua Alexander,et al.  The instability of philosophical intuitions: Running hot and cold on truetemp , 2008 .

[62]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  The general and specific nature of medical expertise: A critical look. , 1991 .

[63]  R. A. Carlson,et al.  Acquisition of a problem-solving skill : levels of organization and use of working memory , 1990 .

[64]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[65]  Corinne Zimmerman.  The development of scientific reasoning skills. , 2000 .

[66]  J. Reitman,et al.  Knowledge organization and skill differences in computer programmers , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[67]  R. Nordlinger,et al.  How do we decide? , 1980, Journal of Thai Association for Voluntary Sterilization.

[68]  Chris Hawkins,et al.  Motivation to Think and Order Effects in Persuasion: The Moderating Role of Chunking , 2001 .

[69]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[70]  Lysann Damisch,et al.  Olympic medals as fruits of comparison? Assimilation and contrast in sequential performance judgments. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[71]  Bill Broyles.  Notes , 1907, The Classical Review.

[72]  Jennifer Culbertson,et al.  Are Linguists Better Subjects? , 2009, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[73]  Thomas Wasow,et al.  Intuitions in linguistic argumentation , 2005 .

[74]  J. Weinberg.  Configuring the Cognitive Imagination , 2008 .

[75]  Walter Sinnott-Armstrong,et al.  Framing moral intuitions. , 2008 .

[76]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Expertise: acquisition, limitations, and control , 2009 .