The size of noctilucent cloud particles above ALOMAR (69N,16E): Optical modeling and method description

Abstract Noctilucent clouds (NLC) have been observed by a Rayleigh/Mie/Raman (RMR) lidar in Northern Norway (69N,16E) capable to measure the aerosol backscatter coefficients at three wavelengths (355 nm, 532 nm, 1064 nm) and since 1998 also under sunlight conditions. For strong noctilucent cloud events the three backscatter coefficients are used to calculate the parameters of a monomodal particle distribution describing the observed optical properties. We deduce the radius of the particle size distribution, the width, and the average number density of the particle ensemble. To minimize the smearing by a changing structure of the noctilucent clouds we use the lowest possible time and altitude resolutions, which are 14 and 150 min, respectively. Using this, the vertical structure of the particle properties below and above the peak is investigated. From a statistical comparison of the observed ratios of backscatter coefficients we find that under the assumption of spherical particles the lognormal distribution describes the optical properties of NLC above ALOMAR better than the Gaussian distribution. If the optical analysis is extended to aspherical particles then both Gaussian and lognormal distribution can sufficiently describe the optical properties when the axis ratio of the particles is allowed to vary from 1/10 to 10. Using the traditional optical model but the new data inversion method on the summer 1998 NLC data leads to the same results found by von Cossart et al. [von Cossart, G., Fiedler, J., von Zahn, U. Size distributions of NLC particles as determined from 3-colour observations of NLC by ground-based lidar, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26 (11), 1513–1516. doi: 10.1029/1999GL900226, 1999]. Using the new optical model we find that independent of the assumed particle shape the average size of strong NLCs above ALOMAR in 2005 is 47 ± 3 nm for spheroids or cylinders with Gaussian distribution while it is 54 ± 3 nm for the same particles but assuming a lognormal size distribution. The distribution widths are s = 16 ± 1 nm or σ = 1.25 ± 0.03 for Gaussian or lognormal distribution while the particle number-density is N = 120 cm−3 for both cases. This comparison shows that the combination of three widely separated wavelengths used in backscatter geometry allows a robust measurement of the particle size. We recommend performing the sensitivity test of the deduced particle properties on the particle shape also for other optical instruments sounding the NLC particle sizes.

[1]  Z. Kam,et al.  Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles , 1998 .

[2]  E. Llewellyn,et al.  Vertical variation of NLC particle sizes retrieved from Odin/OSIRIS limb scattering observations , 2005 .

[3]  F. Lübken,et al.  Experimental evidence for ice particle interaction with metal atoms at the high latitude summer mesopause region , 2004 .

[4]  Gary E. Thomas,et al.  The importance of ice particle shape on UV measurements of polar mesospheric clouds: SBUV/2 observations , 2006 .

[5]  G. Thomas,et al.  Wave breaking signatures in noctilucent clouds , 1993 .

[6]  Christopher P. McKay,et al.  On the mean particle size and water content of polar mesospheric clouds , 1985 .

[7]  Gary E. Thomas,et al.  Small‐scale temperature variations in the vicinity of NLC: Experimental and model results , 2001 .

[8]  A. Wegener.  Die Erforschung der obersten Atmosphärenschichten , 1912 .

[9]  M. Stevens,et al.  Antarctic mesospheric clouds formed from space shuttle exhaust , 2005 .

[10]  Franz-Josef Lübken,et al.  Thermal structure of the Arctic summer mesosphere , 1999 .

[11]  M. Rapp,et al.  Polar mesosphere summer echoes (PMSE): Review of observations and current understanding , 2004 .

[12]  S. Warren,et al.  Optical constants of ice from the ultraviolet to the microwave. , 1984, Applied optics.

[13]  R. Turco,et al.  Noctilucent clouds: Simulation studies of their genesis, properties and global influences , 1982 .

[14]  G. Witt,et al.  Rocket-borne photometry of NLC particle populations , 2001 .

[15]  U. Berger,et al.  Persistent ice cloud in the midsummer upper mesosphere at high latitudes: Three‐dimensional modeling and cloud interactions with ambient water vapor , 2003 .

[16]  J. Carbary,et al.  Evidence for bimodal particle distribution from the spectra of polar mesospheric clouds , 2004 .

[17]  G. Thomas,et al.  Particle size distributions in polar mesospheric clouds derived from Solar Mesosphere Explorer measurements , 1991 .

[18]  J. Olivero,et al.  A quarter-century of satellite polar mesospheric cloud observations , 2006 .

[19]  U. Zahn,et al.  Icy particles in the summer mesopause region: Three-dimensional modeling of their environment and two-dimensional modeling of their transport , 2002 .

[20]  Alain Hauchecorne,et al.  The ALOMAR Rayleigh/Mie/Raman lidar: objectives, configuration, and performance , 2000 .

[21]  M. Rapp,et al.  Effect of ice particles on the mesospheric potassium layer at Spitsbergen (78°N) , 2007 .

[22]  O. Jesse.  Die Höhe der leuchtenden Nachtwolken , 1896 .

[23]  Gary E. Thomas,et al.  Modeling the microphysics of mesospheric ice particles: Assessment of current capabilities and basic sensitivities , 2006 .

[24]  Larry D. Travis,et al.  Capabilities and limitations of a current FORTRAN implementation of the T-matrix method for randomly oriented, rotationally symmetric scatterers , 1998 .

[25]  M. Gerding,et al.  NLC particle properties from a five‐color lidar observation at 54°N , 2000 .

[26]  J. Schneider,et al.  Multiwavelength lidar observation of a strange noctilucent cloud at Kühlungsborn, Germany (54°N) , 2001 .

[27]  K. H. Fricke,et al.  Investigation of the shape of noctilucent cloud particles by polarization lidar technique , 2002 .

[28]  M. Rapp,et al.  Latitudinal dependence of noctilucent cloud growth , 2006 .

[29]  Robert E. Thompson,et al.  First confirmation that water ice is the primary component of polar mesospheric clouds , 2001 .

[30]  M. Gadsden.  The orientation of scatterers in noctilucent clouds , 1983 .

[31]  J. Fiedler,et al.  Size distributions of NLC particles as determined from 3‐color observations of NLC by ground‐based lidar , 1999 .

[32]  G. Witt,et al.  In situ measurements of the vertical structure of a noctilucent cloud , 1998 .

[33]  G. Witt.  Optical characteristics of mesospheric aerosol distributions in relation to noctilucent clouds , 1968 .

[34]  G. Baumgarten,et al.  Mean diurnal variations of noctilucent clouds during 7 years of lidar observations at ALOMAR , 2005 .

[35]  P. Dalin,et al.  Forty years of noctilucent cloud observations near Moscow: Database and simple statistics , 2003 .

[36]  A. Bucholtz,et al.  Rayleigh-scattering calculations for the terrestrial atmosphere. , 1995, Applied optics.

[37]  Matthew T. DeLand,et al.  Solar backscattered ultraviolet (SBUV) observations of polar mesospheric clouds (PMCs) over two solar cycles , 2003 .

[38]  Curtis P. Rinsland,et al.  Shape and composition of PMC particles derived from satellite remote sensing measurements , 2005 .

[39]  M. Summers,et al.  Water vapor enhancement in the polar summer mesosphere and its relationship to polar mesospheric clouds , 2003 .

[40]  Gary E. Thomas,et al.  Satellite observations of polar mesospheric clouds by the solar backscattered ultraviolet spectral radiometer: Evidence of a solar cycle dependence , 1991 .

[41]  G. Baumgarten,et al.  Noctilucent clouds above ALOMAR between 1997 and 2001: Occurrence and properties , 2003 .