A research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about complex interventions.

OBJECTIVES This article outlines a research and development agenda for systematic reviews that ask complex questions about interventions varying in degree and type of complexity. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Consensus development by key authors of articles on methodological challenges in systematic reviews of complex interventions, based on a 2-day workshop in Montebello, Canada, January 2012. RESULTS There is an urgent need for a more precise and consistently applied lexicon and language to disaggregate several conceptually distinct dimensions of "complexity." Selected current evidence synthesis methods have potential application in reviews where complexity is important. There is a lack of evaluation of methods to better understand the nature of complex interventions and the optimal processes of synthesizing and interpreting evidence from these systematic reviews. Gaps in methods, knowledge, and know-how exist, and there is a need for additional guidance. CONCLUSION Understanding how complexity can impact on findings of systematic reviews is critical. Experience in applying methods that have been developed to facilitate this understanding is limited, and the degree to which these approaches improve the systematic review process or transparency is only partially understood. Future research should concentrate on the impact of complexity on the systematic review process and findings and on further methodological development.

[1]  Sophie Hill,et al.  Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  Craig Whittington,et al.  Using theory to synthesise evidence from behaviour change interventions: the example of audit and feedback. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[4]  Eva Rehfuess,et al.  Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  Susan Michie,et al.  Investigating complexity in systematic reviews of interventions by using a spectrum of methods. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  David Moher,et al.  PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity , 2012, PLoS medicine.

[7]  Janet E Squires,et al.  Systematic reviews of complex interventions: framing the review question. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  Yang Gao,et al.  Interventions for preventing obesity in children , 2014, Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina.

[9]  Julian Sheather,et al.  Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation , 2008 .

[10]  Yang Gao,et al.  Interventions for preventing obesity in children. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  Terri D. Pigott,et al.  Identifying, documenting, and examining heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  Sophie V. Eastwood,et al.  Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  F. Leeuw,et al.  Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation , 2010 .

[14]  Jane Noyes,et al.  Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  S. Reeves,et al.  Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update). , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Housing improvements for health and associated socio-economic outcomes. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[17]  Rachel Churchill,et al.  Introducing a series of methodological articles on considering complexity in systematic reviews of interventions. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  Elizabeth Waters,et al.  Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  Jane M. Young,et al.  Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[20]  Gerald Gartlehner,et al.  [GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence]. , 2013, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.

[21]  Rafael Perera,et al.  Graphical method for depicting randomised trials of complex interventions , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  Jeremy Grimshaw,et al.  Complex interventions and their implications for systematic reviews: A pragmatic approach. , 2015, International journal of nursing studies.