The structure and evaluation of a holistic professional development model for Physics teachers

A holistic model for the development of South African secondary school physics teachers in a distance education context was constructed. The model was tested with 75 teachers over a period of four years. The model was developed in three phases and provides for the simultaneous development of teachers along the following dimensions: content knowledge, teaching approaches and professional attitudes. Results showed development of the teachers in these dimensions. In the development process some of the elements of the model were changed, some left unchanged and new ones added. The final model included the following elements: a study guide that integrated the development of teachers’ content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, cognitive skills and experimental skills; reflective journals; assignments; workshops; peer support and science kits. In this paper a brief description of the research that culminated in the Holistic Professional Development (HPD) model will be given as well as how the model was evaluated. Evidence will be presented for the effectiveness of the model in helping teachers develop along the three desired dimensions.

[1]  Sam Stringfield.  Why Is It so Hard to Get Good Schools? , 2004 .

[2]  Neuman.  Social Research Methods , 2007 .

[3]  Fred Goldberg,et al.  Research in physics learning : theoretical issues and empirical studies : proceedings of an international workshop held at the University of Bremen, March 4-8, 1991 , 1992 .

[4]  S. Loucks-Horsley.  Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics , 1997 .

[5]  D. Grayson.  Concept substitution: A teaching strategy for helping students disentangle related physics concepts , 2004 .

[6]  S. Loucks-Horsley.  Principles of Effective Professional Development for Mathematics and Science Education: A Synthesis of Standards , 1996 .

[7]  A. Arons,et al.  Student patterns of thinking and reasoning , 1984 .

[8]  Philip Scott.  A Constructivist View of Learning and Teaching in Science. Children's Learning in Science Project. , 1987 .

[9]  R T Johnson,et al.  Oral interaction in cooperative learning groups: speaking, listening, and the nature of statements made by high-, medium-, and low-achieving students. , 1985, The Journal of psychology.

[10]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[11]  Arnold B. Arons,et al.  Teaching Introductory Physics , 1996 .

[12]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[13]  Diane J. Grayson,et al.  Creating a holistic model for Physical Science teacher development: establishing a baseline , 2002 .

[14]  Larry Cuban.  Why Is It So Hard to Get Good Schools , 2003 .

[15]  Charles J. Eick,et al.  What makes an inquiry‐oriented science teacher? The influence of learning histories on student teacher role identity and practice , 2002 .

[16]  Diane J. Grayson,et al.  A holistic approach to preparing disadvantaged students to succeed in tertiary science studies. Part II. Outcomes of the Science Foundation Programme , 1996 .

[17]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[18]  Arnold B. Arons,et al.  Student Patterns of Thinking and Reasoning. Part Three. , 1984 .

[19]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  Effects of Professional Development on Teachers’ Instruction: Results from a Three-year Longitudinal Study , 2002 .