Short-latency disparity vergence responses and their dependence on a prior saccadic eye movement.

1. A dichoptic viewing arrangement was used to study the initial vergence eye movements elicited by brief horizontal disparity steps applied to large textured patterns in three rhesus monkeys. Disconjugate steps (range, 0.2-10.9 degrees) were applied to the patterns at selected times (range, 13-303 ms) after 10 degrees leftward saccades into the center of the pattern. The horizontal and vertical positions of both eyes were recorded with the electromagnetic search coil technique. 2. Without training or reinforcement, disparity steps of suitable amplitude consistently elicited vergence responses at short latencies. For example, with 1.8 degrees crossed-disparity steps applied 26 ms after the centering saccade, the mean latency of onset of convergence for each of the three monkeys was 52.2 +/- 3.8 (SD) ms, 52.3 +/- 5.2 ms, and 53.4 +/- 4.1 ms. 3. Experiments in which the disparity step was confined to only one eye indicated that each eye was not simply tracking the apparent motion that is saw. For example, when crossed-disparity steps were confined to the right eye (which saw leftward steps), the result was (binocular) convergence in which the left eye moved to the right even though that eye had seen only a stationary scene. This movement of the left eye cannot have resulted from independent monocular tracking and indicates that the vergences here derived from the binocular misalignment of the two retinal images. 4. The initial vergence responses to crossed-disparity steps had the following main features. 1) They were always in the correct (i.e., convergent) direction over the full range of stimuli tested, the initial vergence acceleration increasing progressively with increases in disparity until reaching a peak with steps of 1.4-2.4 degrees and declining thereafter to a nonzero asymptote as steps exceeded 5-7 degrees. 2) They showed transient postsaccadic enhancement whereby steps applied in the immediate wake of a saccadic eye movement resulted in much higher initial vergence accelerations than the same steps applied some time later. The response decline in the wake of a saccade was roughly exponential with time constants of 67 +/- 5 (SD) ms, 35 +/- 2 ms, and 54 +/- 4 ms for the three animals. 3) That the postsaccadic enhancement might have resulted in part from the visual stimulation associated with the prior saccade was suggested by the finding that enhancement could also be observed when the disparity steps were applied in the wake of (conjugate) saccadelike shifts of the textured pattern. However, this visual enhancement did not reach a peak unit 17-37 ms after the end of the "simulated" saccade, and the peak enhancement averaged only 45% of that after a "real" saccade. 4) Qualitatively similar transient enhancements in the wake of real and simulated saccades have also been reported for initial ocular following responses elicited by conjugate drifts of the visual scene. We replicated the enhancement effects on ocular following to allow a direct comparison with the enhancement effects on disparity vergence using the same animals and visual stimulus patterns and, despite some clear quantitative differences, we suggest that the enhancement effects share a similar etiology. 5. Initial vergence responses to uncrossed-disparity steps had the following main features. 1) They were in the correct (i.e., divergent) direction only for very small steps (< 1.5-2.5 degrees), and then only when postsaccadic delays were small; when the magnitude of the steps was increased beyond these levels, responses declined to zero and thereafter reversed direction, eventually reaching a nonzero (convergent) asymptote similar to that seen with large crossed-disparity steps; convergent responses were also seen with larger vertical disparity steps, suggesting that they represent default responses to any disparity exceeding a few degrees. 2) As the postsaccadic delay was increased, responses to small steps (1.8 degrees) declined to zero and thereafter re

[1]  R. Gellman,et al.  Human smooth pursuit: stimulus-dependent responses. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Martin J. Steinbach,et al.  Nonadditivity of vergence and saccadic eye movement , 1978, Vision Research.

[3]  Cortical neural mechanisms of stereopsis studied with dynamic random-dot stereograms. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[4]  W. Newsome,et al.  Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. I. Mechanisms of direction and speed selectivity in extrastriate area MT. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  R. M. Steinman,et al.  The need for an eclectic, rather than systems, approach to the study of the primate oculomotor system , 1986, Vision Research.

[6]  B. Richmond,et al.  Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: An improved method , 1980, Vision Research.

[7]  W. Newsome,et al.  Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. II. Spatiotemporal range of directional interactions in MT and V1. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  S G Lisberger,et al.  Visual motion processing for the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements in humans. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Properties of stimuli eliciting vergence eye movements and stereopsis. , 1970, Vision research.

[10]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Disjunctive eye movements , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Neural mechanisms of binocular vision , 1986, Vision Research.

[12]  F A Miles,et al.  Ocular responses to translation and their dependence on viewing distance. II. Motion of the scene. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  G WESTHEIMER,et al.  Eye movement responses to convergence stimuli. , 1956, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  A. Fuchs,et al.  A method for measuring horizontal and vertical eye movement chronically in the monkey. , 1966, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  R Jones,et al.  Vergence eye movements to pairs of disparity stimuli with shape selection cues. , 1972, Vision research.

[16]  R Jones,et al.  Fusional vergence: sustained and transient components. , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[17]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control—II. Single target displacements , 1979, Vision Research.

[18]  H Collewijn,et al.  Ocular vergence under natural conditions. II. Gaze shifts between real targets differing in distance and direction , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[19]  F. Krause,et al.  Binocular matching in monkey visual cortex: Single cell responses to correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random dot stereograms , 1993, Neuroscience.

[20]  F A Miles,et al.  Ocular responses to translation and their dependence on viewing distance. I. Motion of the observer. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  B G Cumming,et al.  Disparity-induced and blur-induced convergence eye movement and accommodation in the monkey. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  H Collewijn,et al.  Binocular eye movements and the perception of depth. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[23]  M. Alpern The position of the eyes during prism vergence. , 1957, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  Hiroshi Ono,et al.  Changing fixation in the transverse plane at eye level and Hering's law of equal innervation , 1978, Vision Research.

[25]  L M Optican,et al.  Saccade-vergence interactions in humans. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  F A Miles,et al.  Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. II. Dependence on a prior saccadic eye movement. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  W. Newsome,et al.  Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. III. Psychophysics and physiology of apparent motion. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  On the neurophysiological organization of binocular vision , 1990, Vision Research.

[29]  D. Mitchell Qualitative depth localization with diplopic images of dissimilar shape. , 1969, Vision research.

[30]  G Westheimer,et al.  The sensory stimulus for disjunctive eye movements. , 1969, Vision research.

[31]  L. Stark,et al.  Unequal saccades during vergence. , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[32]  W. King,et al.  Dynamics and efficacy of saccade-facilitated vergence eye movements in monkeys. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Poggio Gf Cortical neural mechanisms of stereopsis studied with dynamic random-dot stereograms. , 1990 .

[34]  J. T. Enright Changes in vergence mediated by saccades. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control—I. Periodic target steps , 1979, Vision Research.

[36]  M. C. Jones,et al.  Spline Smoothing and Nonparametric Regression. , 1989 .

[37]  R. Jones,et al.  Anomalies of disparity detection in the human visual system. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.