Look What It Can Do: Tool Heads Prime Saccades

Tools are wielded by their handles, but a lot of information about their function comes from their heads (the action-ends). While hand motor responses are affected by the position of a tool’s handle, not much is known about what parts of a tool might affect eye gaze. Here weinvestigated whether eye saccadic movements are primed by tool handles, similar to handactions, or whether they are primed by tool heads (action-ends). We measured human saccadic reaction times while subjects were performing an attentional task. We found that saccadic reaction times were faster when performed to the side congruent with the tool head, even though “toolness” was irrelevant for the task. Our results show that heads are automatically processed by the visual system to orient eye movements, showing that eyes and hands are driven by distinct parts of manipulable objects and by the kinds of information these parts afford.

[1]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Visual and visuomotor processing of hands and tools as a case study of cross talk between the dorsal and ventral streams , 2018, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[2]  W. Prinz,et al.  Movements, actions and tool-use actions: an ideomotor approach to imitation , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Tool manipulation knowledge is retrieved by way of the ventral visual object processing pathway , 2013, Cortex.

[5]  B. Mahon,et al.  Action at a distance on object-related ventral temporal representations , 2019, Cortex.

[6]  Jacqueline C Snow,et al.  Attentional capture for tool images is driven by the head end of the tool, not the handle , 2016, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[7]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Closely overlapping responses to tools and hands in left lateral occipitotemporal cortex. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Visual and linguistic cues to graspable objects , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Rhodri Cusack,et al.  Disentangling Representations of Object and Grasp Properties in the Human Brain , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Craig S. Chapman,et al.  To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  F. Vitu,et al.  The role of object affordances and center of gravity in eye movements toward isolated daily-life objects. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[13]  Katherine L. Roberts,et al.  Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Resilience to the contralateral visual field bias as a window into object representations , 2016, Cortex.

[15]  Jacqueline C. Snow,et al.  Priming tool actions: Are real objects more effective primes than pictures? , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Alessandro D’Ausilio,et al.  Representing tools as hand movements: Early and somatotopic visuomotor transformations , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[18]  Jorge Almeida,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Alters Functional Network Structure in Humans: A Graph Theoretical Analysis , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Temporal Frequency Tuning Reveals Interactions between the Dorsal and Ventral Visual Streams , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Posner,et al.  Inhibition of return : Neural basis and function , 1985 .

[21]  L. Stark,et al.  The main sequence, a tool for studying human eye movements , 1975 .

[22]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[23]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Grasping with the eyes: The role of elongation in visual recognition of manipulable objects , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[24]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Action Priming on Object Recognition: Evidence for Fast and Slow Influences of Action on Perception , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  A pantomiming priming study on the grasp and functional use actions of tools , 2019, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  L. Wheaton,et al.  The visual encoding of tool–object affordances , 2015, Neuroscience.

[27]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Connectivity-based constraints on category-specificity in the ventral object processing pathway , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.