The dynamics of IT boundary objects, information infrastructures, and organisational identities: the introduction of 3D modelling technologies into the architecture, engineering, and construction industry
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Eswaran Subrahmanian,et al. Boundary Objects and Prototypes at the Interfaces of Engineering Design , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).
[2] Peter Weill,et al. The Implications of Information Technology Infrastructure for Business Process Redesign , 1999, MIS Q..
[3] Wai Fong Chua,et al. The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing , 2001 .
[4] S. Morgan. Communities of Practice and Social Learning in Associations of Organic Farmers in Wales , 2010 .
[5] A. V. D. Ven,et al. Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .
[6] Paul R. Carlile,et al. Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..
[7] R CarlilePaul. A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries , 2002 .
[8] Amany R. Elbanna,et al. From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2001 .
[9] Kalle Lyytinen,et al. Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction , 2007, Organ. Sci..
[10] Beth A. Bechky. Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..
[11] Emmanuelle Vaast,et al. The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..
[12] E. Wenger. Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .
[13] Kevin G. Corley,et al. Organizational Identity, Image, and Adaptive Instability , 2000 .
[14] B. Latour. Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .
[15] Natalia Levina,et al. Collaborating on Multi-Party Information Systems Development Projects: A Collective Reflection-in-Action View , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..
[16] Karen Ruhleder,et al. Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..
[17] Yasmin Merali,et al. The role of boundaries in knowledge processes , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[18] Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al. Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..
[19] R. Yin. Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .
[20] Nancy Bogucki Duncan,et al. Capturing Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: A Study of Resource Characteristics and their Measure , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[21] Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al. Bridging User Organizations: Knowledge Brokering and the Work of Information Technology Professionals , 2004, MIS Q..
[22] Peter Beck. The AEC Dilemma—Exploring the Barriers To Change , 2001 .
[23] Roger Elvin,et al. A new framework for managing IT‐enabled business change , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..
[24] Les Gasser,et al. Information Infrastructures for Distributed Collective Practices , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).
[25] Sarita Albagli,et al. Memory Practices in the Sciences , 2008 .
[26] Susan Leigh Star,et al. Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .
[27] A. Salter,et al. Postcards from the Edge: Local Communities, Global Programs and Boundary Objects , 2004 .
[28] Susan Gasson,et al. A genealogical study of boundary-spanning IS design , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[29] P. Bourdieu,et al. Language and Symbolic Power , 1991 .
[30] Johannes M. Pennings,et al. The Urban Quality of Life and Entrepreneurship , 1982 .
[31] Trevor Wood-Harper,et al. The shaping of I.T. trajectories: evidence from the U.K. public sector , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[32] Daniel J. Brass,et al. A Grounded Model of Organizational Schema Change During Empowerment , 2000 .
[33] R. Badham,et al. The Politics of Socio-technical Intervention: An Interactionist View , 2000 .
[34] Richard J. Ormerod,et al. A new perspective on the dynamics of information technology‐enabled strategic change , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..
[35] Susan Leigh Star,et al. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 1999 .
[36] David Bawden,et al. Memory Practices in the Sciences , 2007 .
[37] Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al. Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .
[38] Roberta Lamb,et al. Information and Communication Technology Challenges to Scientific Professional Identity , 2005, Inf. Soc..
[39] Elaine K. Yakura,et al. Charting Time: Timelines as Temporal Boundary Objects , 2002 .
[40] M. Schultz,et al. Responding to Organizational Identity Threats: Exploring the Role of Organizational Culture , 2006 .
[41] P. Berger,et al. The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .
[42] J. Overhage,et al. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[43] S. L. Star,et al. The Ethnography of Infrastructure , 1999 .
[44] Paul R. Carlile,et al. A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..
[45] O. Hanseth,et al. From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2000 .
[46] Kathryn Henderson,et al. Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering , 1991 .
[47] K. Eisenhardt. Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.