Abstract This paper presents a model of phonotactic grammar in which wellformedness of consonant clusters is measured by NAD. NAD stands for a Net Auditory Distance obtaining between segments in a cluster. The auditory distance is a net reflection of the differences between segments in terms of manner (MOA) and place of articulation (POA). It is calculated according to the Principle which states that a cluster is preferred if it satisfies a pattern of distances specified by the universal phonotactic preference relevant for its position in a word. Every position of a cluster in a word, i.e. initial, medial and final, is defined by a respective well-formedness (“goodness of cluster”) preference. The NAD Principle makes finer predictions than the sonority sequencing generalization (SSG). For example, it predicts that initial pr- is “better” (more preferred) that tr-, and they are both better than ps- or rt-, while the latter two are of comparable value. However, phonology alone does not fully account for clusters. Inflection, word-formation and compounding contribute to the creation of consonant clusters to an extent relative to a morphological type of a language. Therefore, a phonotactic grammar operates on basic, non-derived, lexical forms, while morphonotactics takes care of the remaining, morphologically complex, forms. Interaction between phonotactics and morphonotactics provides a richer insight into the understanding of cluster complexity.
[1]
S. Rixon.
English Phonetics and Phonology
,
2003
.
[2]
Hans Basbøll,et al.
The phonology of Danish
,
2005
.
[3]
Keith A. Johnson,et al.
Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics
,
1997,
Phonetica.
[4]
W. Kehrein,et al.
A prosodic theory of laryngeal contrasts
,
2004,
Phonology.
[5]
P. Ladefoged.
A course in phonetics
,
1975
.
[6]
Ian Maddieson.
Calculating phonological complexity
,
2009
.
[7]
D. Stampe.
A dissertation on natural phonology
,
1979
.
[8]
W. Dressler,et al.
Sources of markedness in language structures
,
2001
.
[9]
Ian Maddieson.
Linguistic Universals: In search of universals
,
2006
.
[10]
Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kolaczyk,et al.
Classification of the Lexicon of Modern Polish According to the Structure of Consonant Clusters
,
2011,
ICPhS.
[11]
Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk.
NP Extension: B&B Phonotactics
,
2009
.
[12]
Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk,et al.
Beats-and-Binding Phonology
,
2002
.
[13]
James P. Kirby,et al.
Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
,
2011
.
[14]
J. Ohala,et al.
Prosodic phonology and phonetics
,
1984,
Phonology Yearbook.
[15]
Pier Marco Bertinetto,et al.
INTERSEGMENTAL COHESION AND SYLLABLE DIVISION IN POLISH
,
2007
.
[16]
J. Ohala.
Papers in Laboratory Phonology: The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilation
,
1990
.