Self-assessed hearing abilities in middle- and older-age adults: A stratified sampling approach

Abstract Objective: For evaluation of audiological service outcomes, the primary objective was to determine baseline and target profiles on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ); a secondary objective was to test a short form of the SSQ; opportunity was also taken to compare responses of samples providing consistent versus inconsistent self-assessments. Design: 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design crossed age, reported presence versus absence of hearing difficulty, and low versus high self-rated hearing ability. Study sample: Eight samples (total, n = 413), representing two age ranges; a response of “yes” or “no” to a question about having hearing difficulty, and either low or high self-rated hearing ability on six items from the SSQ. Results: Using present and previous results, baseline SSQ profiles were determined indicating the pattern of response likely to be observed prior to clinical intervention, and both an achieved outcome and “ideal” target outcome from such intervention. The six-item SSQ yielded better test-retest results in consistent versus inconsistent samples. The inconsistent samples showed signs of different interpretations of “hearing difficulty”. Conclusions: Baseline, and both actual and ideal target outcomes can guide comparative appraisal of clinical achievements; more research is needed to determine a robust short form of the SSQ.

[1]  R B Wallace,et al.  Data quality and age: health and psychobehavioral correlates of item nonresponse and inconsistent responses. , 1989, Journal of gerontology.

[2]  W. Noble,et al.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[3]  S Gatehouse,et al.  The role of non-auditory factors in measured and self-reported disability. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[4]  J. S. Stevenson,et al.  Older Adults , 1980, Suicide Prevention.

[5]  J. Wouters,et al.  Functional benefit of the bone‐anchored hearing aid with different auditory profiles: objective and subjective measures , 2011, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[6]  Stuart Gatehouse,et al.  Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap , 2004, International Journal of Audiology.

[7]  Stuart Gatehouse,et al.  Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ) , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[8]  R. Bentler,et al.  Optimal Outcome Measures, Research Priorities, and International Cooperation , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[9]  D. Stephens,et al.  Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. , 2007, Health technology assessment.

[10]  R M Cox,et al.  Comparison of two questionnaires for patient-assessed hearing aid benefit. , 1991, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[11]  M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[12]  S. Arndt,et al.  Einseitige Taubheit und Cochlear-implant-Versorgung , 2011, HNO.

[13]  Gurjit Singh,et al.  Older adults’ performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): Test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[14]  Stuart Gatehouse,et al.  Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: Derivation and Validation of a Client-centered Outcome Measure for Hearing Aid Services , 1999 .

[15]  M. Akeroyd,et al.  Two-eared listening in dynamic situations , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[16]  J Bamford,et al.  Current practice, accuracy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the school entry hearing screen. , 2007, Health technology assessment.

[17]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[18]  Kelly G. Shaver,et al.  The attribution of blame : causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness , 1985 .

[19]  A. Aschendorff,et al.  [Unilateral deafness and cochlear implantation: audiological diagnostic evaluation and outcomes]. , 2011, HNO.

[20]  H. Dillon,et al.  Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[21]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  The ear-brain system: approaches to the study and treatment of hearing loss. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[22]  R. Meredith,et al.  Hearing disability in people aged 50-65: effectiveness and acceptability of rehabilitative intervention. , 1990, BMJ.

[23]  S Gatehouse,et al.  Components and Determinants of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1994, Ear and hearing.