Predicting the threshold of pulse-train electrical stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise

The incorporation of low levels of noise into an electrical stimulus has been shown to improve auditory thresholds in some human subjects (Zeng et al., 2000). In this paper, thresholds for noise-modulated pulse-train stimuli are predicted utilizing a stochastic neural-behavioral model of ensemble fiber responses to bi-phasic stimuli. The neural refractory effect is described using a Markov model for a noise-free pulse-train stimulus and a closed-form solution for the steady-state neural response is provided. For noise-modulated pulse-train stimuli, a recursive method using the conditional probability is utilized to track the neural responses to each successive pulse. A neural spike count rule has been presented for both threshold and intensity discrimination under the assumption that auditory perception occurs via integration over a relatively long time period (Bruce et al., 1999). An alternative approach originates from the hypothesis of the multilook model (Viemeister and Wakefield, 1991), which argues that auditory perception is based on several shorter time integrations and may suggest an NofM model for prediction of pulse-train threshold. This motivates analyzing the neural response to each individual pulse within a pulse train, which is considered to be the brief look. A logarithmic rule is hypothesized for pulse-train threshold. Predictions from the multilook model are shown to match trends in psychophysical data for noise-free stimuli that are not always matched by the long-time integration rule. Theoretical predictions indicate that threshold decreases as noise variance increases. Theoretical models of the neural response to pulse-train stimuli not only reduce calculational overhead but also facilitate utilization of signal detection theory and are easily extended to multichannel psychophysical tasks.

[1]  B. Pfingst,et al.  Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. II: Frequency and interpulse interval. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  A theoretical comparison of information transmission in the peripheral auditory system: Normal and impaired frequency discrimination , 2003, Speech Commun..

[3]  A. Sutera,et al.  The mechanism of stochastic resonance , 1981 .

[4]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Temporal integration and multiple looks. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  A theoretical analysis of the effects of auditory impairment on intensity discrimination , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[6]  E D Young,et al.  Rate responses of auditory nerve fibers to tones in noise near masked threshold. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  I. Miller Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes , 1966 .

[8]  Edwin C. Moxon,et al.  Physiological Considerations in Artificial Stimulation of the Inner Ear , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[9]  Eric Li,et al.  A nonstationary Poisson point process describes the sequence of action potentials over long time scales in lateral-superior-olive auditory neurons , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  John J. Galvin,et al.  Encoding loudness by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve , 1998, Neuroreport.

[11]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Stochastic resonance without tuning , 1995, Nature.

[12]  K. Mark,et al.  A statistical study of cochlear nerve discharge patterns in response to complex speech stimuli. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Donald L. Snyder,et al.  Random Point Processes in Time and Space , 1991 .

[14]  Malvin C. Teich,et al.  Normalizing transformations for dead-time-modified Poisson counting distributions , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  C. E. Molnar,et al.  Stimulus and recovery dependence of cat cochlear nerve fiber spike discharge probability. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  R V Shannon,et al.  Psychophysical laws revealed by electric hearing. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[17]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Predicting the threshold of single-pulse electrical stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of noise , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Leslie M Collins,et al.  Psychophysical threshold variability in cochlear implant subjects , 2003, Hearing Research.

[19]  J. T Rubinstein,et al.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation , 1999, Hearing Research.

[20]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[21]  W. A. Munson,et al.  The Growth of Auditory Sensation , 1947 .

[22]  M C Teich,et al.  Auditory-nerve action potentials form a nonrenewal point process over short as well as long time scales. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Mark E. Robert,et al.  Noise Enhances Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Listeners: Stochastic Resonance in a Prosthetic Sensory System? , 2001, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[24]  R. Shannon Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants , 1985, Hearing Research.

[25]  J T Rubinstein,et al.  Threshold fluctuations in an N sodium channel model of the node of Ranvier. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Ian C. Bruce,et al.  Renewal-Process Approximation of a Stochastic Threshold Model for Electrical Neural Stimulation , 2000, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[27]  A. Huxley,et al.  The action potential in the myelinated nerve fibre of Xenopus laevis as computed on the basis of voltage clamp data , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  I.C. Bruce,et al.  The effects of stochastic neural activity in a model predicting intensity perception with cochlear implants: low-rate stimulation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  On the Relationship Between Noise and Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Subjects: A Theoretical , 2000 .

[30]  E. Evans,et al.  Enhancement of vowel coding for cochlear implants by addition of noise , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[31]  P. Gray Conditional probability analyses of the spike activity of single neurons. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[32]  M. White,et al.  A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: single-pulse response , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[34]  M. White,et al.  A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: pulse-train response , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  W. M. Siebert,et al.  Frequency discrimination in the auditory system: Place or periodicity mechanisms? , 1970 .

[36]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Human hearing enhanced by noise 1 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 23 May 2000. , 2000, Brain Research.

[37]  D. M. Green,et al.  Detection of partially filled gaps in noise and the temporal modulation transfer function. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  William M. Siebert,et al.  Some implications of the stochastic behavior of primary auditory neurons , 1965, Kybernetik.

[39]  H. E. Derksen,et al.  Fluctuation phenomena in nerve membrane , 1968 .

[40]  Robert S Hong,et al.  Dynamic Range Enhancement for Cochlear Implants , 2003, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[41]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Relation between Hearing Threshold and Duration for Tone Pulses , 1959 .

[42]  J. T. Rubinstein,et al.  The neuronal response to electrical constant-amplitude pulse train stimulation: additive Gaussian noise , 2000, Hearing Research.

[43]  Robert P. Morse,et al.  Additive noise can enhance temporal coding in a computational model of analogue cochlear implant stimulation , 1999, Hearing Research.

[44]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  The effects of interpulse interval on stochastic properties of electrical stimulation: models and measurements , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Control strategies for neurons modeled by self‐exciting point processes , 1995 .

[46]  N. Viemeister Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.