A case study-based investigation of students’ experiences with social software tools

The term “social software” covers a range of tools which allow users to interact and share data with other users, primarily via the web. Blogs, wikis, podcasts and social networking websites are some of the tools that are being used in educational, social and business contexts. We have examined the use of social software in the UK further and higher education to collect evidence of the effective use of social software in student learning and engagement. We applied case study methodology involving educators and students from 26 initiatives. In this paper, we focus on the student experience: educational goals of using social software; benefits to the students; and the challenges they experience. Our investigations have shown that social software supports a variety of ways of learning: sharing of resources; collaborative learning; problem-based and inquiry-based learning; and reflective learning. Students gain transferable skills of team working, negotiation, communication and managing digital identities. Although these tools enhance a student's sense of community, the need to share and collaborate brings in additional responsibility and workload, which some students find inflexible and “forced”. Our findings show that students have concerns about usability, privacy and the public nature of social software tools for academic activities.

[1]  Terry Anderson,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Online Learning: Second Edition , 2008 .

[2]  Henry Jenkins.  Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[3]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[4]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[5]  Christian Dalsgaard,et al.  Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems , 2006 .

[6]  Clay Shirky.  Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations , 2008 .

[7]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Distance learning – Social software’s killer ap? , 2005 .

[8]  Gill Kirkup,et al.  An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging in higher education , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[9]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Social Computing: An Overview , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  D. Nicol,et al.  The social dimensions of online learning , 2003 .

[11]  Shailey Minocha,et al.  Collaborative Learning in a Wiki Environment: Experiences from a software engineering course , 2007, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[12]  D. Garrison,et al.  Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[13]  Jan-Hinrik Schmidt,et al.  Social software: facilitating information-, identity- and relationship-management , 2006 .

[14]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World , 2008 .

[15]  Tom Brier,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[16]  Tom Franklin and Mark Van Harmelen.  Web 2.0 for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education , 2007 .

[17]  Torill Mortensen,et al.  Blogging thoughts: personal publication as an online research tool , 2002 .

[18]  J. Knottnerus,et al.  Real world research. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  Terry Anderson,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Online Learning , 2009 .

[20]  Shailey Minocha,et al.  Using wikis to simulate distributed requirements development in a software engineering course , 2008 .

[21]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[22]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age , 2009 .

[23]  Philip Barker,et al.  Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From Production to Produsage , 2009 .