Application of Bayesian Active Learning to the Estimation of Auditory Filter Shapes Using the Notched-Noise Method

Time-efficient hearing tests are important in both clinical practice and research studies. This particularly applies to notched-noise tests, which are rarely done in clinical practice because of the time required. Auditory-filter shapes derived from notched-noise data may be useful for diagnosis of the cause of hearing loss and for fitting of hearing aids, especially if measured over a wide range of center frequencies. To reduce the testing time, we applied Bayesian active learning (BAL) to the notched-noise test, picking the most informative stimulus parameters for each trial based on nine Gaussian Processes. A total of 11 hearing-impaired subjects were tested. In 20 to 30 min, the test provided estimates of signal threshold as a continuous function of frequency from 500 to 4000 Hz for nine notch widths and for notches placed both symmetrically and asymmetrically around the signal frequency. The thresholds were found to be consistent with those obtained using a 2-up/1-down forced-choice procedure at a single center frequency. In particular, differences in threshold between the methods did not vary with notch width. An independent second run of the BAL test for one notch width showed that it is reliable. The data derived from the BAL test were used to estimate auditory-filter width and asymmetry and detection efficiency for center frequencies from 500 to 4000 Hz. The results agreed with expectations for cochlear hearing losses that were derived from the audiogram and a hearing model.

[1]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Fast estimation of equal-loudness contours using Bayesian active learning and direct scaling , 2020, Acoustical Science and Technology.

[2]  Yi Shen,et al.  Toward Routine Assessments of Auditory Filter Shape. , 2019, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[3]  Ole Hau,et al.  Perceptual Effects of Adjusting Hearing-Aid Gain by Means of a Machine-Learning Approach Based on Individual User Preference , 2019, Trends in hearing.

[4]  Z. Zhang,et al.  Feasibility of interleaved Bayesian adaptive procedures in estimating the equal-loudness contour. , 2018, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Richard E. Turner,et al.  A Hearing-Model-Based Active-Learning Test for the Determination of Dead Regions , 2018, Trends in hearing.

[6]  Richard E. Turner,et al.  Audiogram estimation using Bayesian active learning. , 2018, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Adaptive Processes in Hearing , 2018, Trends in hearing.

[8]  Roman Garnett,et al.  Psychometric function estimation by probabilistic classification. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Mike Brookes,et al.  Robust and efficient Bayesian adaptive psychometric function estimation. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  M.G.H. Cox,et al.  A Bayesian binary classification approach to pure tone audiometry , 2015, 1511.08670.

[11]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Fast, Continuous Audiogram Estimation Using Machine Learning , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[12]  Yi Shen,et al.  Rapid estimation of high-parameter auditory-filter shapes. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Cognitive Tomography Reveals Complex, Task-Independent Mental Representations , 2013, Current Biology.

[14]  Neil D. Lawrence,et al.  Gaussian Processes for Big Data , 2013, UAI.

[15]  Yi Shen,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the auditory filter. , 2013, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Bayesian Active Learning for Classification and Preference Learning , 2011, ArXiv.

[17]  G. Keidser,et al.  The NAL-NL2 Prescription Procedure , 2011, Audiology research.

[18]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (GPML) Toolbox , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  AMTAS®: Automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: Validation studies , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[20]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Development of a new method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression: CAMEQ2-HF , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[21]  S. Scollie,et al.  The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm , 2005, Trends in amplification.

[22]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves , 2005 .

[23]  Matthias W. Seeger,et al.  Gaussian Processes For Machine Learning , 2004, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[24]  B. Moore,et al.  A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss , 2004, Hearing Research.

[25]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves. , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[26]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Tom Minka,et al.  Expectation Propagation for approximate Bayesian inference , 2001, UAI.

[28]  T. Irino,et al.  A compressive gammachirp auditory filter for both physiological and psychophysical data. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  B C Moore,et al.  Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  C. Tyler,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold , 1999, Vision Research.

[31]  David Barber,et al.  Bayesian Classification With Gaussian Processes , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[32]  R. Patterson,et al.  Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Frequency‐Resolution Measurements with Notched Noises for Clinical Purposes , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[34]  C Kaernbach,et al.  A single-interval adjustment-matrix (SIAM) procedure for unbiased adaptive testing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[36]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shape. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Perception-Based Personalization of Hearing Aids Using Gaussian Processes and Active Learning , 2015, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[42]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[43]  Alan B. Cobo-Lewis,et al.  An adaptive psychophysical method for subject classification , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  Harvey b. Fletcher,et al.  Speech and hearing in communication , 1953 .

[45]  Georg v. Békésy,et al.  A New Audiometer , 1947 .