Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial

Abstract Objectives: To investigate the effect of a computer based clinical decision support system and a risk chart on absolute cardiovascular risk, blood pressure, and prescribing of cardiovascular drugs in hypertensive patients. Design: Cluster randomised controlled trial. Setting: 27 general practices in Avon. Participants: 614 patients aged between 60 and 79 years with high blood pressure. Interventions: Patients were randomised to computer based clinical decision support system plus cardiovascular risk chart; cardiovascular risk chart alone; or usual care. Main outcome measures: Percentage of patients in each group with a five year cardiovascular risk≥10%, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, prescribing of cardiovascular drugs. Results: Patients in the computer based clinical decision support system and chart only groups were no more likely to have cardiovascular risk reduced to below 10% than patients receiving usual care. Patients in the computer based clinical decision support group were more likely to have a cardiovascular risk≥10% than chart only patients, odds ratio 2.3 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 4.8). The chart only group had significantly lower systolic blood pressure compared with the usual care group (difference in means−4.6 mm Hg (95% confidence interval−8.4 to−0.8). Reduction of diastolic blood pressure did not differ between the three groups. The chart only group were twice as likely to be prescribed two classes of cardiovascular drugs and over three times as likely to be prescribed three or more classes of drugs compared with the other groups. Conclusions: The computer based clinical decision support system did not confer any benefit in absolute risk reduction or blood pressure control and requires further development and evaluation before use in clinical care can be recommended. Use of chart guidelines are associated with a potentially important reduction in systolic blood pressure.

[1]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XVIII. How to use an article evaluating the clinical impact of a computer-based clinical decision support system. , 1999, JAMA.

[2]  J M Grimshaw,et al.  Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. , 1994, Lancet.

[3]  D. Sackett,et al.  Guidelines for managing raised blood pressure , 1996, BMJ.

[4]  T. Peters,et al.  A general practice-based study examining the absolute risk of cardiovascular disease in treated hypertensive patients. , 1996, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[5]  T. Peters,et al.  What constitutes controlled hypertension? Patient based comparison of hypertension guidelines , 1996, BMJ.

[6]  T. Fahey,et al.  A systematic review of the use of computers in the management of hypertension. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[7]  J. Swales Textbook of hypertension , 1994 .

[8]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.

[9]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[10]  S. Ebrahim Detection, adherence and control of hypertension for the prevention of stroke: a systematic review. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[11]  A Donner,et al.  Randomization by cluster. , 1991, Nursing research.

[12]  Patrick Vallance,et al.  A simple computer program for guiding management of cardiovascular risk factors and prescribing , 1999, BMJ.

[13]  B. Haynes,et al.  Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice , 1998, BMJ.

[14]  I. Purves,et al.  Prodigy Interim Report , 1996 .

[15]  P Degoulet,et al.  Do physicians estimate reliably the cardiovascular risk of hypertensive patients?. , 1995, Medinfo. MEDINFO.

[16]  M. Abrahamowicz,et al.  Do doctors accurately assess coronary risk in their patients? Preliminary results of the coronary health assessment study , 1995, BMJ.

[17]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes , 1998 .

[18]  A. Donner,et al.  Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis. , 1981, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  J. Ménard,et al.  Mild hypertension: the mysterious viability of a faulty concept. , 1995, Journal of hypertension.

[20]  H. Ward,et al.  Inadequate management of blood pressure in a hypertensive population. , 1999, New England Journal of Medicine.