Introducing information in dialogues: forms of introduction chosen by young speakers and the responses elicited from young listeners

Young speakers in dialogue must establish mutual knowledge. Traditionally, researchers have focused on how children used indefinite and definite articles to signal novel and shared information. In this study of 170 children aged seven to thirteen, the form of introduction chosen, whether question or statement, is more significant than the type of article used. No developmental effects on article use emerge, with statement + indefinite always the least common choice. However, young speakers use question introductions significantly less than older children. There is also a developmental interaction between speakers' and listeners' behaviour. Question introduction elicit effective listener responses at all ages, but only twelve-year-olds respond reliably to statements. Unfortunately, young speakers prefer just those forms of introduction to which young listeners are least likely to provide informative feedback. Thus two separate developmental effects appear to combine to hamper young subjects' chances of achieving successful communication in dialogues.

[1]  I. Pollack,et al.  The Intelligibility of Excerpts from Conversation , 1963 .

[2]  A. Dittmann Developmental Factors in Conversational Behavior , 1972 .

[3]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[4]  H. H. Clark,et al.  What's new? Acquiring New information as a process in comprehension , 1974 .

[5]  Carole L. Menig-Peterson The Modification of Communicative Behavior in Preschool-aged Children as a Function of the Listener's Perspective. , 1975 .

[6]  David Warden,et al.  The Influence of Context on Children's Use of Identifying Expressions and References. , 1976 .

[7]  Lois Bloom,et al.  Adult-child discourse: Developmental interaction between information processing and linguistic knowledge , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  M. Maratsos The Use of Definite and Indefinite Reference in Young Children: An Experimental Study of Semantic Acquisition , 1976 .

[9]  E. Robinson,et al.  Development in the understanding of causes of success and failure in verbal communication , 1977, Cognition.

[10]  C. Patterson,et al.  Plans and the Development of Listener Skills. , 1977 .

[11]  Scott A Miller,et al.  The Effects of Age, Sex, and Listener Feedback on Grade School Children's Referential Communication. , 1977 .

[12]  D. Bearison,et al.  Children's Comprehension of Referential Communication: Decoding Ambiguous Messages. , 1977 .

[13]  E. Robinson,et al.  Children's explanations of communication failure and the inadequacy of the misunderstood message. , 1977 .

[14]  Ellen M. Markman,et al.  Realizing That You Don't Understand: A Preliminary Investigation. , 1977 .

[15]  Grover J. Whitehurst,et al.  How Children Learn to Listen: The Effects of Modeling Feedback Styles on Children's Performance in Referential Communication. , 1978 .

[16]  Dianne Horgan,et al.  How to answer questions when you've got nothing to say , 1978, Journal of Child Language.

[17]  J. Hawkins Definiteness and indefiniteness: a study in reference and grammaticality prediction , 1978 .

[18]  M. Steffensen Satisfying inquisitive adults: some simple methods of answering yes/no questions , 1978, Journal of Child Language.

[19]  Ellen M. Markman,et al.  Realizing that you don't understand: elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies. , 1979 .

[20]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Descriptions and discourse models , 1980 .

[21]  D. Warden Learning to identify referents , 1981 .

[22]  H. Emslie,et al.  Pre-school children's use of the articles in definite and indefinite referring expressions , 1981, Journal of Child Language.

[23]  W. P. Dickson,et al.  Children's oral communication skills , 1981 .

[24]  J. Flavell,et al.  Effect of increasing the salience of message ambiguities on kindergartners' evaluations of communicative success and message adequacy. , 1982 .

[25]  T. Pechmann,et al.  Social interaction and the development of definite descriptions , 1982, Cognition.

[26]  F. D. Horowitz,et al.  The effects of intonation on infant attention: the role of the rising intonation contour , 1983, Journal of Child Language.

[27]  Michael Brady,et al.  Computational Models of Discourse , 1983 .

[28]  D. Stern,et al.  The prosody of maternal speech: infant age and context related changes , 1983, Journal of Child Language.

[29]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[30]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  The Accessibility of Pronominal Antecedents as a Function of Episode Shifts in Narrative Text , 1983 .

[31]  T. Bennett-Kastor Noun phrases and coherence in child narratives , 1983, Journal of Child Language.

[32]  Thom Huebner,et al.  A Longitudinal Analysis of the Acquisition of English , 1983 .

[33]  H. Wellman,et al.  Comprehension monitoring in preschool children. , 1985, Child development.

[34]  Annette Karmiloff-Smith,et al.  Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective , 1985 .

[35]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[36]  Yukiko Ushie ‘Corepresentation’ — A textual function of the indefinite expression , 1986 .

[37]  R. Power,et al.  The use of the definite and indefinite articles by Italian preschool children , 1986, Journal of Child Language.

[38]  Betsy Parrish,et al.  A New Look at Methodologies in the Study of Article Acquisition for Learners of ESL. , 1987 .

[39]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[40]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Models of language development , 1988 .

[41]  Margaret Thomas,et al.  The acquisition of English articles by first- and second-language learners , 1989, Applied Psycholinguistics.