Incorporating experience curves in appliance standards analysis

There exists considerable evidence that manufacturing costs and consumer prices of residential appliances have decreased in real terms over the last several decades. This phenomenon is generally attributable to manufacturing efficiency gained with cumulative experience producing a certain good, and is modeled by an empirical experience curve. The technical analyses conducted in support of U.S. energy conservation standards for residential appliances and commercial equipment have, until recently, assumed that manufacturing costs and retail prices remain constant during the projected 30-year analysis period. This assumption does not reflect real market price dynamics. Using price data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we present U.S. experience curves for room air conditioners, clothes dryers, central air conditioners, furnaces, and refrigerators and freezers. These experience curves were incorporated into recent energy conservation standards analyses for these products. Including experience curves increases the national consumer net present value of potential standard levels. In some cases a potential standard level exhibits a net benefit when considering experience, whereas without experience it exhibits a net cost. These results highlight the importance of modeling more representative market prices.

[1]  J. Simon,et al.  The economic implications of learning-by-doing for population size and growth. , 1984, European economic review.

[2]  Alan H. Sanstad,et al.  Learning-by-doing on both the demand and the supply sides: implications for electric utility investments in a Heuristic model , 2004 .

[3]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[4]  Louis E. Yelle.  THE LEARNING CURVE: HISTORICAL REVIEW AND COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY , 1979 .

[5]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Uncertainties in Technology Experience Curves for Integrated Assessment Models , 2007 .

[6]  F. Bass.  The Relationship between Diffusion Rates, Experience Curves, and Demand Elasticities for Consumer Durable Technological Innovations , 1980 .

[7]  G. Nadler,et al.  MANUFACTURING PROGRESS FUNCTIONS FOR TYPES OF PROCESSES , 1963 .

[8]  Martin B. Zimmerman,et al.  Learning Effects and the Commercialization of new Energy Technologies: The Case of Nuclear Power , 2015 .

[9]  Gregory F. Nemet,et al.  Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics , 2006 .

[10]  J. Sweeney,et al.  Learning-by-Doing and the Optimal Solar Policy in California , 2008 .

[11]  A. Alchian.  Reliability of Progress Curves in Airframe Production , 1963 .

[12]  J. Dutton,et al.  Treating Progress Functions as a Managerial Opportunity , 1984 .

[13]  Wolfgang Eichhammer,et al.  Effects of economies of scale and experience on the costs of energy-efficient technologies – case study of electric motors in Germany , 2010 .

[14]  W. Baumol,et al.  MACROECONOMICS OF UNBALANCED GROWTH: THE ANATOMY OF THE URBAN CRISES , 1967 .

[15]  R. Leach.  The learning curve , 1992 .

[16]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  The Effects of Learning by Doing on Nuclear Plant Operating Reliability , 1979 .

[17]  Lena Neij,et al.  Use of experience curves to analyse the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology , 1997 .

[18]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .

[19]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Technical Change Theory and Learning Curves: Patterns of Progress in Energy Technologies , 2006 .

[20]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Analyzing price and efficiency dynamics of large appliances with the experience curve approach , 2010 .

[21]  C. Wene.  Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[22]  Asami Miketa,et al.  The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom , 2005 .

[23]  Edward N. Wolff,et al.  Unbalanced growth revisited: Asymptotic stagnancy and new evidence , 1985 .

[24]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[25]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Learning Curves For Energy Technology and Policy Analysis: A Critical Assessment , 2007 .

[26]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  A functional approach for studying technological progress: Extension to energy technology , 2008 .

[27]  William J. Baumol,et al.  American Economic Association Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth : The Anatomy of Urban Crisis , 2007 .

[28]  H. Gruber.  The learning curve in the production of semiconductor memory chips , 1992 .

[29]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  A review of experience curve analyses for energy demand technologies , 2010 .

[30]  W.G.J.H.M. van Sark,et al.  Introducing errors in progress ratios determined from experience curves , 2008 .

[31]  G.E. Moore,et al.  Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[32]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Riding down the experience curve for energy-efficient building envelopes: the Swiss case for 1970–2020 , 2004 .

[33]  Markus Mueller,et al.  Learning curves for emerging energy technologies , 2009 .

[34]  Sonia Yeh,et al.  Assessment of technologies to meet a low carbon fuel standard. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Global experience curves for wind farms , 2005 .

[36]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[37]  Armen Alchain.  Reliability of Progress Curves in Airframe Production. Revision 3 , 1950 .

[38]  Larry Dale,et al.  Retrospective Evaluation of Appliance Price Trends , 2009 .

[39]  A. Masini,et al.  Forecasting the diffusion of photovoltaic systems in southern Europe: A learning curve approach $ , 2003 .

[40]  James E. McMahon,et al.  Technical Support Document: Energy efficiency standards for consumer products: residential central air conditioners and heat pumps , 2004 .

[41]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  Diagnosing the Experience Curve , 1983 .

[42]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  A functional approach for studying technological progress: Application to information technology ☆ , 2006 .

[43]  James E. McMahon,et al.  Energy efficiency standards for equipment: Additional opportunities in the residential and commercial sectors , 2006 .

[44]  K. Kirsner,et al.  Beyond the Learning Curve: The Construction of Mind , 2005 .

[45]  Maya Papineau,et al.  An economic perspective on experience curves and dynamic economies in renewable energy technologies , 2006 .

[46]  Ari Rabl,et al.  Prospects for PV: a learning curve analysis , 2003 .

[47]  Fatih Birol,et al.  Technical Change Theory and Learning Curves : Patterns of Progress in Electricity Generation Technologies , 2007 .

[48]  P Schiellerup.  An examination of the effectiveness of the EU minimum standard on cold appliances: the British case , 2002 .

[49]  Hans-Paul Siderius,et al.  Setting MEPS for electronic products , 2014 .

[50]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Learning rates for energy technologies , 2001 .

[51]  Karin Ibenholt.  Explaining learning curves for wind power , 2002 .

[52]  F. Ferioli,et al.  Use and limitations of learning curves for energy technology policy: A component-learning hypothesis , 2009 .

[53]  Mads Greaker,et al.  Explaining experience curves for new energy technologies: A case study of liquefied natural gas , 2008 .

[54]  Alan Meier,et al.  Do energy effi cient appliances cost more , 2007 .