Some observations on the pedestal effect.

The pedestal or dipper effect is the large improvement in the detectability of a sinusoidal grating observed when it is added to a masking or pedestal grating of the same spatial frequency, orientation, and phase. We measured the pedestal effect in both broadband and notched noise-noise from which a 1.5-octave band centered on the signal frequency had been removed. Although the pedestal effect persists in broadband noise, it almost disappears in the notched noise. Furthermore, the pedestal effect is substantial when either high- or low-pass masking noise is used. We conclude that the pedestal effect in the absence of notched noise results principally from the use of information derived from channels with peak sensitivities at spatial frequencies different from that of the signal and the pedestal. We speculate that the spatial-frequency components of the notched noise above and below the spatial frequency of the signal and the pedestal prevent "off-frequency looking," that is, prevent the use of information about changes in contrast carried in channels tuned to spatial frequencies that are very much different from that of the signal and the pedestal. Thus, the pedestal or dipper effect measured without notched noise appears not to be a characteristic of individual spatial-frequency-tuned channels.

[1]  D. Raab Intensity Discrimination, the , 1963 .

[2]  J. Robson Spatial and Temporal Contrast-Sensitivity Functions of the Visual System , 1966 .

[3]  G B Henning A model for auditory discrimination and detection. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Adaptation to spatial stimuli. , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Amplitude discrimination in noise, pedestal experiments, and additivity of masking. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  P. E. Stopp Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing 1971, Plomp and Smoorenburg (Editors). Leiden, Netherlands: Sijthoff Leiden. Cloth, Fl. 60 , 1971 .

[8]  N. Graham,et al.  Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: a comparison of single-channel and multiple-channels models. , 1971, Vision research.

[9]  B. Julesz,et al.  Spatial-frequency masking in vision: critical bands and spread of masking. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Intensity discrimination of pulsed sinusoids: the effects of filtered noise. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  S. S. Stevens Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing. , 1972 .

[12]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.

[13]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Some experiments bearing on the hypothesis that the visual system analyses spatial patterns in independent bands of spatial frequency , 1975, Vision Research.

[14]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  C. K. Yuen,et al.  Theory and Application of Digital Signal Processing , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  D. H. Kelly Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[17]  D H Kelly,et al.  Motion and vision. I. Stabilized images of stationary gratings. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[18]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[19]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[20]  G. Legge A power law for contrast discrimination , 1981, Vision Research.

[21]  G. Henning,et al.  Effects of different hypothetical detection mechanisms on the shape of spatial-frequency filters inferred from masking experiments: I. Noise masks. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[22]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Striate cortex responses to periodic patterns with and without the fundamental harmonics , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  A comparison of contrast detection and discrimination , 1986, Vision Research.

[25]  G. Legge,et al.  Contrast discrimination in noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[26]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Facilitation and masking of briefly presented gratings: Time-course and contrast dependence , 1987, Vision Research.

[27]  G. Henning,et al.  Spatial-frequency tuning as a function of temporal frequency and stimulus motion. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[28]  A. Derrington,et al.  Some observations on the masking effects of two-dimensional stimuli , 1989, Vision Research.

[29]  J. Ross,et al.  Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Mark W. Cannon,et al.  A transducer model for contrast perceptio , 1991, Vision Research.

[31]  M. Cannon,et al.  A transducer model for contrast perception. , 1991, Vision research.

[32]  S S Saunders,et al.  Discrimination performance of single neurons: rate and temporal-pattern information. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Cortical neurons: Isolation of contrast gain control , 1992, Vision Research.

[34]  D. Heeger Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[35]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Suppression and the dynamic range of hearing. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Geoffrey M. Boynton,et al.  Forward pattern masking and adaptation: Effects of duration, interstimulus interval, contrast, and spatial and temporal frequency , 1993, Vision Research.

[37]  D. Heeger The Representation of Visual Stimuli in Primary Visual Cortex , 1994 .

[38]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[39]  M. Carandini,et al.  Summation and division by neurons in primate visual cortex. , 1994, Science.

[40]  W. Makous,et al.  Modeling pedestal experiments with amplitude instead of contrast , 1995, Vision Research.

[41]  K. Mullen,et al.  Color and luminance spatial tuning estimated by noise masking in the absence of off-frequency looking. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[42]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Bayesian analysis of identification performance in monkey visual cortex: Nonlinear mechanisms and stimulus certainty , 1995, Vision Research.

[43]  J. Movshon,et al.  Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Felix A. Wichmann Masking by plaid patterns is not explained by adaptation, simple contrast gain-control or distortion products , 1997 .

[45]  Felix A. Wichmann,et al.  Masking by plaid patterns: spatial frequency tuning and contrast dependency , 1997 .

[46]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Visual cortex neurons in monkeys and cats: Detection, discrimination, and identification , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[47]  John M. Foley,et al.  Analysis of the effect of pattern adaptation on pattern pedestal effects: A two-process model , 1997, Vision Research.

[48]  J. Dannemiller,et al.  Contrast gain control in psychophysical contrast discrimination , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  Felix A. Wichmann,et al.  Some Aspects of Modelling Human Spatial Vision: Contrast Discrimination , 1999 .

[50]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Felix Wichmann,et al.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Disentangling signal from noise in visual contrast discrimination , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[54]  G. Henning,et al.  Contrast discrimination with pulse trains in pink noise. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[55]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Contrast discrimination with sinusoidal gratings of different spatial frequency. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[56]  Christopher W Tyler,et al.  Separating the effects of response nonlinearity and internal noise psychophysically , 2002, Vision Research.

[57]  G. Henning,et al.  Masking effects of low-frequency sinusoidal gratings on the detection of contrast modulation in high-frequency carriers. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[58]  G. J. Burton,et al.  Contrast discrimination by the human visual system , 1981, Biological Cybernetics.

[59]  Felix A. Wichmann Masking by plaid patterns revisited , 2004 .