Firm Scale and the Endogenous Timing of Entry: a Choice between Commitment and Flexibility
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Fudenberg,et al. Preemption and Rent Equalization in the Adoption of New Technology , 1985 .
[2] E. Green. Continuum and Finite-Player Noncooperative Models of Competition , 1984 .
[3] Avinash Dixit,et al. A MODEL OF DUOPOLY SUGGESTING A THEORY OF ENTRY BARRIERS , 1978 .
[4] E. Gal‐Or,et al. First Mover and Second Mover Advantages , 1985 .
[5] Elie Appelbaum,et al. Contestable Markets Under Uncertainty , 1985 .
[6] J.P.M. Hurkens,et al. Endogenous Stackelberg leadership , 1999 .
[7] J. Tirole. The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .
[8] Jennifer F. Reinganum. A two-stage model of research and development with endogenous second-mover advantages , 1985 .
[9] Jonathan H. Hamilton,et al. Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or cournot equilibria , 1990 .
[10] F. Scherer,et al. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .
[11] Marcel Boyer,et al. Capacity Commitment Versus Flexibility: The Technological Choice Nexus in a Strategic Context , 1995 .
[12] Andrew Postlewaite,et al. Oligopoly and Competition in Large Markets , 1980 .
[13] Arthur J. Robson,et al. Duopoly with Endogenous Strategic Timing: Stackelberg Regained , 1990 .
[14] G. Mailath. Endogenous Sequencing of Firm Decisions , 1993 .
[15] Michel Moreaux,et al. Being a leader or a follower: Reflections on the distribution of roles in duopoly , 1987 .