Dietary importance of various prey fishes for pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.) in large shallow lake Võrtsjärv (Estonia)

The present study examines the composition of the diet and size-related as well as seasonal changes in the prey selection of pikeperch in large eutrophic L. Vortsjarv. The total stomach contents of 325 pikeperch with a standard length of 5-76 cm were analysed in 1994-2005 with the goal to assess how the predation pressure of pikeperch is distributed over various prey species. The frequency of occurrence (FO), the number and restored weight of prey fish as well as the index of relative importance (IRI) and Ivlev's selectivity index (E) were used for the description of pikeperch diet. The results of our study showed that the first prey fish for young pikeperch were mainly congeners and smelt Osmerus eperlanus (L.). With increasing body size the diet of pikeperch was enriched with ruffe Gymnocephalus cernuus (L.), perch Perca fluviatilis L., and roach Rutilus rutilus (L.). According to IRI, ruffe (IRI = 56%) was the most important prey for pikeperch in L. Vortsjarv, while roach and perch were of second-rank importance. Bream Abramis brama (L.) was a rejected prey fish (E = - 0.9) for pikeperch, while smelt (E = 0.8) was actively selected. In comparison with data from the 1950s (Erm, V. 1961. Eesti riim- ja magevete kohade bioloogilistest ja morfoloogilistest erinevustest. In Hudrobioloogilised uurimused, Vol. 2, pp. 289-342, Tartu), the main long-term changes in the diet of pikeperch are related to shifts in the fish community structure. Vendace Coregonus albula (L.) was the main prey (FO = 54%) for pikeperch in the 1950s, but it is absent from the recent diet. At present smelt replaces vendace in the diet of young pikeperch. Cannibalism was not observed half a century ago due to the small number of pikeperch in the lake at that time.

[1]  K. Kangur,et al.  The role of temperature in the population dynamics of smelt Osmerus eperlanus eperlanus m. spirinchus Pallas in Lake Peipsi (Estonia/Russia) , 2007, Hydrobiologia.

[2]  K. Kangur,et al.  Condition and growth of ruffe Gymnocephalus cernuus (L.) in two large shallow lakes with different fish fauna and food recourse , 2003, Hydrobiologia.

[3]  M. Perrow,et al.  Changes in the fish community and water quality during seven years of stocking piscivorous fish in a shallow lake , 2002 .

[4]  C. Brönmark,et al.  Foraging capacity and resource synchronization in an ontogenetic diet switcher, pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) , 2002 .

[5]  A. Kangur,et al.  Long-term trends in the fish communities of Lakes Peipsi and Võrtsjärv (Estonia) , 2002 .

[6]  P. Biró.  Freshwater biodiversity: An outlook of objectives, achievements, research fields, and co-operation , 2001 .

[7]  C. L. Pierce,et al.  Empirical Assessment of Indices of Prey Importance in the Diets of Predacious Fish , 2001 .

[8]  B. Morales-Nin,et al.  Prey selectivity in planktivorous juvenile fishes associated with floating objects in the western Mediterranean , 2001 .

[9]  E. Cortés.  Methods of studying fish feeding: reply , 1998 .

[10]  S. Carpenter,et al.  The Trophic Cascade in Lakes , 1994 .

[11]  C. Adams.  Shift in pike, Esox lucius L., predation pressure following the introduction of ruffe, Gymnocephalus cernuus (L.) to Loch Lomond , 1991 .

[12]  J. Benndorf.  Conditions for effective biomanipulation; conclusions derived from whole-lake experiments in Europe , 1990, Hydrobiologia.

[13]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Cascading Trophic Interactions and Lake Productivity , 1985 .

[14]  K. Hindar,et al.  Habitat and Food Segregation of Dwarf and Normal Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus) from Vangsvatnet Lake, Western Norway , 1982 .

[15]  S. Bowen,et al.  Methods for study of fish diets based on analysis of stomach contents. , 1978 .

[16]  O. Popova,et al.  Food and Feeding Relations of Eurasian Perch (Perca fluviatilis) and Pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) in Various Waters of the USSR , 1977 .

[17]  K. E. Hokanson.  Temperature Requirements of Some Percids and Adaptations to the Seasonal Temperature Cycle , 1977 .

[18]  R. Ryder,et al.  Photoreceptors and Visual Pigments as Related to Behavioral Responses and Preferred Habitats of Perches (Perca spp.) and Pikeperches (Stizostedion spp.) , 1977 .

[19]  Lorne A. Greig,et al.  Percid Habitat: The River Analogy , 1977 .

[20]  L. Pinkas,et al.  Fish Bulletin 152. Food Habits of Albacore, Bluefin Tuna, and Bonito In California Waters , 1970 .

[21]  S..  TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG DEMERSAL FISHES IN A COASTAL AREA OF THE GULF OF MAINE , 2009 .

[22]  A. Sandström,et al.  Effects of Eutrophication on Young-of-the-year Freshwater Fish Communities in Coastal Areas of the Baltic , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[23]  E. Lammens,et al.  The role of predation and competition in determining the distribution of common bream, roach and white bream in Dutch eutrophic lakes , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[24]  E. Lammens.  Consequences of biomanipulation for fish and fisheries , 2001 .

[25]  A. Kangur.  FEEDING OF PIKEPERCH, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.), IN LAKE PEIPSI , 2000, Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. Biology. Ecology.

[26]  H. Helminen,et al.  Feasibility of controlling coarse fish populations through pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) stocking in Lake Köyliönjärvi, SW Finland , 1996 .

[27]  H. Peltonen,et al.  Diet and prey selection of pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)) in Lake Vesijärvi analysed with a logit model , 1996 .

[28]  S. Hansson,et al.  Biology and exploitation of pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.), in the Baltic Sea area , 1996 .

[29]  W. Steffens,et al.  German experiences in the propagation and rearing of fingerling pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) , 1996 .

[30]  I. Winfield,et al.  The fish of Lough Neagh , 1993 .

[31]  E. Pihu.  DISTRIBUTION OF FISH SPECIES IN ESTONIAN LAKES , 1993, Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. Ecology.

[32]  J. Wilson.  The fish of Lough Neagh , 1993 .

[33]  M. P. Grimm,et al.  Possibilities for stock enhancement of pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) in order to increase predation on planktivores. , 1988 .

[34]  J. Hacunda.  TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG DEMERSAL FISHES IN A COASTAL AREA OF THE GULF OF MAINE 1 , 1981 .