Optic disc progression in glaucoma: comparison of confocal scanning laser tomography to optic disc photographs in a prospective study.

PURPOSE To compare confocal scanning laser tomography (CSLT) to optic disc photography for detecting progressive glaucomatous disc changes. METHODS Four expert observers first examined a training set of 40 pairs of monoscopic disc photographs to help set a criterion for change. They then classified 44 pairs of monoscopic photographs of patients followed prospectively as having either definitely no change, probably no change, probably change, or definitely change (score, 0, 1, 2, or 3, respectively). Observers were unaware that 10 pairs were photographs of fellow eyes obtained the same day to measure specificity. These patients were imaged with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph every 6 months. Topographic change analysis (TCA) software with three criteria (yielding specificity of 81%, 94%, or 97%) was used. Comparisons between the TCA results and those of observers were made for a range of liberal to conservative criteria and for individual and combined observer scores. RESULTS The median follow-up was 9.0 years with 18 CSLT images. Observer specificity varied from 50% to 90% (using score 0) and 60% to 100% (using score 0 or 1). Interobserver kappa ranged from 0.22 to 0.38 from the most liberal to conservative criterion and was generally higher than corresponding TCA-observer agreement. For most criteria, observers had either a high hit rate with low specificity or high specificity with a low hit rate compared with the TCA. Similar results were obtained when observer scores were combined to derive a broader range of criteria. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that the TCA performs at least as well as either the individual or best combination of observer classifications of disc photographs.

[1]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Identifying early glaucomatous changes. Comparison between expert clinical assessment of optic disc photographs and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[2]  N. Swindale,et al.  Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  D. Kourkoutas,et al.  Comparison of glaucoma progression evaluated with Heidelberg retina tomograph II versus optic nerve head stereophotographs. , 2007, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[4]  B C Chauhan,et al.  Technique for detecting serial topographic changes in the optic disc and peripapillary retina using scanning laser tomography. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  S. Haymes,et al.  Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  Stefano Miglior,et al.  Reproducibility of evaluation of optic disc change for glaucoma with stereo optic disc photographs. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[7]  P A Sample,et al.  Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. , 1998, Journal of glaucoma.

[8]  RBalwantray C. Chauhan,et al.  Influence of Time Separation on Variability Estimates of Topographic Measurements with Confocal Scanning Laser Tomography , 1995, Journal of glaucoma.

[9]  M. Bach,et al.  Ten-year results: detection of long-term progressive optic disc changes with confocal laser tomography , 2006, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[10]  B C Chauhan,et al.  Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  David P Crabb,et al.  A new statistical approach for quantifying change in series of retinal and optic nerve head topography images. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  Susan Vitale,et al.  Agreement among glaucoma specialists in assessing progressive disc changes from photographs in open-angle glaucoma patients. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  Nicholas G Strouthidis,et al.  Optic disc and visual field progression in ocular hypertensive subjects: detection rates, specificity, and agreement. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[16]  N. Swindale,et al.  Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to Detect Early Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss , 1995, Journal of glaucoma.

[17]  B. Chauhan,et al.  Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma , 2005, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[18]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  B C Chauhan,et al.  Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. , 1994, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  H. Schroder,et al.  Confocal Laser Tomographic Scanning Of The Eye , 1989, Optics & Photonics.

[21]  G. Spaeth,et al.  Knowledge of chronology of optic disc stereophotographs influences the determination of glaucomatous change. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[22]  G. Spaeth,et al.  Detection of changes of the optic disc in glaucomatous eyes: clinical examination and image analysis with the Topcon Imagenet system. , 2000, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[23]  Nicholas G Strouthidis,et al.  Monitoring glaucomatous progression using a novel Heidelberg Retina Tomograph event analysis. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[24]  Ben Parkin,et al.  A comparison of stereoscopic and monoscopic evaluation of optic disc topography using a digital optic disc stereo camera , 2001, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  A C Viswanathan,et al.  Detection of optic disc change with the Heidelberg retina tomograph before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  P. Artes,et al.  Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  R V North,et al.  Digital imaging of the optic nerve head: monoscopic and stereoscopic analysis , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[28]  Douglas R. Anderson,et al.  Test-retest reproducibility of optic disk deterioration detected from stereophotographs by masked graders. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  Jon C. Ervin,et al.  Clinician change detection viewing longitudinal stereophotographs compared to confocal scanning laser tomography in the LSU Experimental Glaucoma (LEG) Study. , 2002, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[30]  L. Sakata,et al.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 to discriminate glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[31]  L Brigatti,et al.  Regional test-retest variability of confocal scanning laser tomography. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.

[32]  B C Chauhan,et al.  Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[33]  A. Ferreras,et al.  Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 for glaucoma. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  J. Caprioli,et al.  Optic disk and nerve fiber layer imaging to detect glaucoma. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[35]  M. Nicolela,et al.  Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[36]  H. Thompson,et al.  Change detection in regional and volumetric disc parameters using longitudinal confocal scanning laser tomography. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[37]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[38]  J. Beiser,et al.  Baseline topographic optic disc measurements are associated with the development of primary open-angle glaucoma: the Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.