Linking employee empowerment with productivity in off-site construction

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to address current knowledge gaps in off-site sub-element fabrication efficiency factors, by identifying an explicit relationship between productivity and employee empowerment. Design/methodology/approach – The research is based on two engineering fabrication-yard case studies that investigate both qualitatively (via analysis of semi-structured interviews that incorporate a five-point Likert scale, with fabrication-product stakeholders), and also quantitatively (via assessment using SPSS statistical analyses to determine significance and trends in the data-set) the relationship between empowerment and productivity. Findings – The results reveal a positive linear relationship in off-site construction between “employee empowerment factors” and, explicitly fabrication-yard “productivity-levels”. An especially strong and significant positive correlation is found to exist in resource development, worker involvement, process improvement, and task recognition as they refer ...

[1]  Jasper Mbachu,et al.  On-Site Labour Productivity of New Zealand Construction Industry: Key Constraints and Improvement Measures , 2011 .

[2]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  EMPOWERMENT AS A STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE , 2004 .

[3]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  Empowering the project team: impact of leadership style and team context , 2012 .

[4]  F. Phua Construction management research at the individual level of analysis: current status, gaps and future directions , 2013 .

[5]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  Empowering project teams: toward an integrative conceptualization of empowerment , 2007 .

[6]  Simaan M. AbouRizk,et al.  Off-Site Construction Planning Using Discrete Event Simulation , 2012 .

[7]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Empowerment within the UK construction sector , 2002 .

[8]  Gary R. Holt,et al.  Constructing empowerment: People, processes, participation and profit , 2000, ICSTM.

[9]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Dynamics of empowerment in projects , 2011 .

[10]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  Empowerment in project teams: a multilevel examination of the job performance implications , 2009 .

[11]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Employee empowerment in construction: an implementation model for process improvement , 2000 .

[12]  G. Spreitzer PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .

[13]  Yehuda Baruch,et al.  The consequences of emerging HRM practices for employees' trust in their managers , 2004 .

[14]  Yimin Zhu,et al.  Comparative Study of Activity-Based Construction Labor Productivity in the United States and China , 2011 .

[15]  E. Lawler,et al.  The empowerment of service workers: what, why, how, and when. , 1992, Sloan management review.

[16]  Lingguang Song,et al.  Measuring and Modeling Labor Productivity Using Historical Data , 2008 .

[17]  M. Taylor A definition and valuation of the UK offsite construction sector , 2010 .

[18]  Juan A. Marin-Garcia,et al.  Relationship between Lean Manufacturing and High Involvement Work Practices and perceived results. , 2010 .

[19]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  Dynamics of control in construction project teams , 2010 .

[20]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  Performance consequences of psychological empowerment , 2009 .

[21]  Mohamed Abdel-Wahab,et al.  Trends of productivity growth in the construction industry across Europe, US and Japan , 2011 .

[22]  Mohammed Fadhil Dulaimi,et al.  The theory and application of empowerment in construction: A comparative study of the different approaches to empowerment in construction, service and manufacturing industries , 1997 .

[23]  L. Jawahar Nesan Efficacy‐information for implementing learning in construction , 2004 .

[24]  Lenin Jawahar Nesan A generic model for effective implementation of empowerment in construction contractor organisations , 1997 .

[25]  Ian P. Herbert,et al.  Business transformation through empowerment and the implications for management control systems , 2009 .

[26]  Gary David Holt,et al.  Assessment of organisational involvement in implementing empowerment , 2002 .

[27]  L. Honold,et al.  A review of the literature on employee empowerment , 1997 .

[28]  Seth R. Silver,et al.  Taking Empowerment to the Next Level: A Multiple-Level Model of Empowerment, Performance, and Satisfaction , 2004 .

[29]  S. Rowlinson,et al.  An exploratory study of the contextual meaning and consequences of empowerment in project teams , 2010 .

[30]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  Control modes and mechanisms in construction project teams: drivers and consequences , 2010 .

[31]  Hemanta Doloi Twinning Motivation, Productivity and Management Strategy in Construction Projects , 2007 .

[32]  Rafael Sacks,et al.  Relative Productivity in the AEC Industries in the United States for On-Site and Off-Site Activities , 2008 .

[33]  J. Nunnally,et al.  Psychometric Theory: NY. , 1978 .

[34]  Yan Ki Fiona Cheung,et al.  Stakeholder management through empowerment: modelling project success , 2008 .

[35]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  What empowers individuals and teams in project settings? A critical incident analysis , 2010 .

[36]  M. Logan,et al.  The Effects of Empowerment on Attitudes and Performance: The Role of Social Support and Empowerment Beliefs , 2007 .

[37]  C. Argyris Empowerment: the emperor's new clothes. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[38]  John Meiling,et al.  Defects in offsite construction: timber module prefabrication , 2009 .

[39]  S. Rowlinson,et al.  Towards a conceptual framework of empowerment and job performance in project teams , 2007 .

[40]  Kevin Au,et al.  Exploring empowerment cross-cultural differences along the power distance dimension , 1999 .

[41]  Sibin Wu,et al.  Competitive strategy, TQM practice, and continuous improvement of international project management , 2009 .

[42]  Graham Sewell The Paradox of Empowerment: Suspended Power and the Possibility of Resistance , 2001 .

[43]  Richard Fellows,et al.  Enhancing commitment through work empowerment , 2007 .