Convergent neofunctionalization by positive Darwinian selection after ancient recurrent duplications of the xanthine dehydrogenase gene

Gene duplication is a primary source of molecular substrate for the emergence of evolutionary novelties. The chances for redundant gene sequences to evolve new functions are small compared with the probability that the copies become disabled by deleterious mutations. Functional divergence after gene duplication can result in two alternative evolutionary fates: one copy acquires a novel function (neofunctionalization), or each copy adopts part of the tasks of their parental gene (subfunctionalization). The relative prevalence of each outcome is unknown. Similarly unknown is the relative importance of positive selection versus random fixation of neutral mutations. Aldehyde oxidase (Ao) and xanthine dehydrogenase (Xdh) genes encode two complex members of the xanthine oxidase family of molybdo-flavoenzymes that carry different functions. Ao is known to have originated from a duplicate of an Xdh gene in eukaryotes, before the origin of multicellularity. We show that (i) Ao evolved independently twice from two different Xdh paralogs, the second time in the chordates, before the diversification of vertebrates; (ii) after each duplication, the Ao duplicate underwent a period of rapid evolution during which identical sites across the two molecules, involving the flavin adenine dinucleotide and substrate-binding pockets, were subjected to intense positive Darwinian selection; and (iii) the second Ao gene likely endured two periods of redundancy, initially as a duplicate of Xdh and later as a functional equivalent of the old Ao, which is currently absent from the vertebrate genome. Caution is appropriate in structural genomics when using sequence similarity for assigning protein function.

[1]  Sergei L. Kosakovsky Pond,et al.  HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies , 2005, Bioinform..

[2]  E. Pai,et al.  Unique amino acids cluster for switching from the dehydrogenase to oxidase form of xanthine oxidoreductase , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Jianzhi Zhang Evolution by gene duplication: an update , 2003 .

[4]  M. Romão,et al.  Mammalian molybdo-flavoenzymes, an expanding family of proteins: structure, genetics, regulation, function and pathophysiology. , 2003, The Biochemical journal.

[5]  Ziheng Yang Inference of selection from multiple species alignments. , 2002, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[6]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[7]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software , 2001, Bioinform..

[8]  A. Force,et al.  The probability of preservation of a newly arisen gene duplicate. , 2001, Genetics.

[9]  F J Ayala,et al.  Erratic overdispersion of three molecular clocks: GPDH, SOD, and XDH , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  F. Ayala,et al.  Shared nucleotide composition biases among species and their impact on phylogenetic reconstructions of the Drosophilidae. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  M. Lynch,et al.  The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. , 2000, Science.

[12]  C. Enroth,et al.  Crystal structures of bovine milk xanthine dehydrogenase and xanthine oxidase: structure-based mechanism of conversion. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  F J Ayala,et al.  Switch in codon bias and increased rates of amino acid substitution in the Drosophila saltans species group. , 1999, Genetics.

[14]  Jaime Prilusky,et al.  Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins , 1999, Bioinform..

[15]  A. Force,et al.  Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. , 1999, Genetics.

[16]  Z. Yang,et al.  Models of amino acid substitution and applications to mitochondrial protein evolution. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[17]  A. Dean,et al.  The structural basis of molecular adaptation. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  M. Nei,et al.  Positive Darwinian selection after gene duplication in primate ribonuclease genes. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. , 1998, Genetics.

[20]  J. Thompson,et al.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[22]  A. Hughes The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  William R. Taylor,et al.  The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences , 1992, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[24]  D. Labie,et al.  Molecular Evolution , 1991, Nature.

[25]  Dr. Susumu Ohno Evolution by Gene Duplication , 1970, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[26]  M. Nei,et al.  Gene Duplication and Nucleotide Substitution in Evolution , 1969, Nature.

[27]  S. G. Stephens Possible Significance of Duplication in Evolution , 1951 .