SUMMARY Aerial locomotion in snakes (genus Chrysopelea) is kinematically distinct from any other type of gliding or powered flight, with prominent, high amplitude body undulations visually dominating the behavior. Because it is not known how flying snakes produce aerodynamic forces in flight, the factors that determine snake flight performance are not clear. In this study, the effects of size and behavior on aerial performance were examined both within a species (C. paradisi) and between two species (C. paradisi and C. ornata), using stepwise multiple regressions to identify relevant variables. Smaller C. paradisi traveled farther than larger snakes at lower sinking speeds, with trajectories that shallowed more quickly and reached lower minimum glide angles. Although wing loading increased faster than expected for isometric size increase, wing loading per se was not responsible for performance differences between large and small snakes. Snakes with higher interactions between relative undulation amplitude and body size transitioned out of the initial acceleration phase at higher airspeeds and sinking speeds, and attained higher maximum airspeeds and horizontal speeds; snakes that used higher average relative amplitudes transitioned out of the initial acceleration phase at higher horizontal speeds. Undulation frequency was not significantly related to any performance variable within C. paradisi and was not significantly different between the two species, suggesting that this variable (in contrast to relative undulation amplitude) may have a minor influence on the aerodynamic mechanism of force production in snake flight. C. paradisi and C. ornata differed significantly in most performance comparisons. C. ornata were more massive than C. paradisi at any given body length and in general exhibited poorer gliding performance than C. paradisi. This study contributes towards understanding how an unconventional body form and kinematics can produce a novel mode of aerial locomotion in a vertebrate glider.
[1]
HORACE B. Porter.
Flight of Birds
,
1874,
Nature.
[2]
A. Garrod.
Animal Locomotion
,
1874,
Nature.
[3]
James A. Oliver,et al.
"Gliding" in Amphibians and Reptiles, with a Remark on an Arboreal Adaptation in the Lizard, Anolis carolinensis carolinensis Voigt
,
1951,
The American Naturalist.
[4]
R. H. Brown,et al.
THE FLIGHT OF BIRDS
,
1963
.
[5]
Gliding speeds of Ptychozoon lionatum (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) and Chrysopelea ornata (Reptilia: Colubridae)
,
1970
.
[6]
Dale L. Marcellini,et al.
Analysis of the gliding behavior of Ptychozoon Lionatum (Reptilia: Gekkonidae)
,
1976
.
[7]
Michael LaBarbera,et al.
ANALYZING BODY SIZE AS A FACTOR IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
,
1989
.
[8]
A. F. Bennett,et al.
Scaling of speed and endurance in garter snakes: a comparison of cross‐sectional and longitudinal allometries
,
1990
.
[9]
Jonathan B. Losos,et al.
Ecomorphology, Performance Capability, and Scaling of West Indian Anolis Lizards: An Evolutionary Analysis
,
1990
.
[10]
S. Vogel,et al.
Life in Moving Fluids
,
2020
.
[11]
H. Shaffer.
Herpetology.—F. Harvey Pough, R. M. Andrews, J. E. Cadle, M. L. Crump, A. H. Savitzky, and K. D. Wells. 1998. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
,
1998
.
[12]
Mark W. Moffett,et al.
What's “Up”? A Critical Look at the Basic Terms of Canopy Biology1
,
2000
.
[13]
G. Taylor,et al.
Animal flight dynamics I. Stability in gliding flight.
,
2001,
Journal of theoretical biology.
[14]
J. Socha.
Kinematics: Gliding flight in the paradise tree snake
,
2002,
Nature.
[15]
M. Labarbera,et al.
A 3-D kinematic analysis of gliding in a flying snake, Chrysopelea paradisi
,
2005,
Journal of Experimental Biology.
[16]
T. Garland,et al.
Ecological Morphology of Locomotor Performance in Squamate Reptiles
,
2022
.