Nucleosomes, ProGRP, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, and CEA in Monitoring First-Line Chemotherapy of Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose: Besides new therapeutic drugs, effective diagnostic tools indicating early the efficacy of therapy are required to improve the individual management of patients with nonoperable cancer diseases. Experimental Design: In prospectively collected sera of 128 patients with newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy, the courses of nucleosomes, progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cytokeratin-19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1), and carcinoembryonic antigen were investigated and correlated with therapy response objectified by computed tomography before start of the third treatment course. Results: In univariate analyses, high levels and insufficient decreases of nucleosomes, ProGRP, NSE, and CYFRA 21-1 during the first and second cycles of therapy correlated with poor outcome. Insufficient response to therapy was most efficiently indicated by the baseline values of nucleosomes, ProGRP, and CYFRA 21-1 before the second therapy cycle reaching areas under the curve (AUC) of 81.8%, 71.3%, and 74.9% in receiver operating characteristic curves, respectively. Combinations of nucleosomes with ProGRP (AUC 84.1%), CYFRA 21-1 (AUC 82.5%), and NSE (AUC 83.6%) further improved the diagnostic power in the high specificity range and yielded sensitivities of 47.1%, 35.3%, and 35.3% at 95% specificity, respectively. In multivariate analyses, including clinical and biochemical variables, only performance score and nucleosomes before cycle 2 were found to independently indicate therapy response. Conclusions: Biochemical markers specifically identified patients with insufficient therapy response at the early treatment phase and showed to be valuable for diseases management of small cell lung cancer.

[1]  W. Oyen,et al.  Predictive and prognostic value of FDG‐PET in nonsmall‐cell lung cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[2]  A. Ardizzoni,et al.  Current Status of Second-Line Treatment and Novel Therapies for Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2007, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[3]  A. Ardizzoni,et al.  Decline in serum carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 19 fragment during chemotherapy predicts objective response and survival in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer , 2006, Cancer.

[4]  K. Feldmann,et al.  Early and Specific Prediction of the Therapeutic Efficacy in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Nucleosomal DNA and Cytokeratin‐19 Fragments , 2006, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  A. Kremer,et al.  Nucleosomes in Colorectal Cancer Patients during Radiochemotherapy , 2006, Tumor Biology.

[6]  Quynh-Thu Le,et al.  Non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology , 2006 .

[7]  S. Marnitz,et al.  Value of 18F-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-d-Glucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer for Prediction of Pathologic Response and Times to Relapse after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  A. Kremer,et al.  Cell-free DNA in serum and plasma: comparison of ELISA and quantitative PCR. , 2005, Clinical Chemistry.

[9]  Walter Weder,et al.  Circulating deoxyribonucleic Acid as prognostic marker in non-small-cell lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  K. Feldmann,et al.  Circulating Nucleosomes Predict the Response to Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  H. Goike,et al.  Clinical utility of cytokeratins as tumor markers. , 2004, Clinical biochemistry.

[12]  P. Stieber,et al.  Apoptotic markers in cancer. , 2004, Clinical biochemistry.

[13]  R. Molina,et al.  ProGRP: a new biomarker for small cell lung cancer. , 2004, Clinical biochemistry.

[14]  R. Stupp,et al.  Small cell lung cancer: state of the art and future perspectives. , 2004, Lung cancer.

[15]  P. Stieber,et al.  Therapy Control in Oncology by Circulating Nucleosomes , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  M Paesmans,et al.  CYFRA 21-1 is a prognostic determinant in non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a meta-analysis in 2063 patients , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  U. Pastorino,et al.  Quantification of free circulating DNA as a diagnostic marker in lung cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Positron emission tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer: prediction of response to chemotherapy by quantitative assessment of glucose use. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  A. Dueñas-González,et al.  Circulating nucleosomes and response to chemotherapy: An in vitro, in vivo and clinical study on cervical cancer patients , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[20]  R. Govindan,et al.  Serum CYFRA 21-1 in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer: an early measure of response. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[21]  Joachim Schneider,et al.  Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), neuron specific enolase (NSE), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19-fragments (CYFRA 21-1) in patients with lung cancer in comparison to other lung diseases. , 2003, Anticancer research.

[22]  P. Johnson,et al.  Presence of filterable and nonfilterable mRNA in the plasma of cancer patients and healthy individuals. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[23]  S Niho,et al.  [Tumor markers in lung cancer]. , 2001, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[24]  M Werner-Wasik,et al.  Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy: tumor diameter, bidimensional product, and volume. A serial CT scan-based study. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  M. Untch,et al.  Nucleosomes in Serum as a Marker for Cell Death , 2001, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[26]  M. Toi,et al.  Clinical significance of plasma nucleosome levels in cancer patients. , 2001, International journal of oncology.

[27]  L. Mariani,et al.  Analysis of circulating tumor DNA in plasma at diagnosis and during follow-up of lung cancer patients. , 2001, Cancer research.

[28]  K. Kiura,et al.  Complementary roles of pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in diagnosis and prognosis of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). , 2001, Lung cancer.

[29]  M. Untch,et al.  Nucleosomes in serum of patients with benign and malignant diseases , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[30]  S. Leung,et al.  Kinetics of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA during radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. , 2000, Cancer research.

[31]  C. Mountain,et al.  The international system for staging lung cancer. , 2000, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[32]  H. Ohmatsu,et al.  Significance of serum pro-gastrin-releasing peptide as a predictor of relapse of small cell lung cancer: comparative evaluation with neuron-specific enolase and carcinoembryonic antigen. , 2000, Lung cancer.

[33]  N. Sunaga,et al.  Serum Pro-Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Is a Useful Marker for Treatment Monitoring and Survival in Small-Cell Lung Cancer , 1999, Oncology.

[34]  H. Dienemann,et al.  Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP)--a useful marker in small cell lung carcinomas. , 1999, Anticancer research.

[35]  N. Maki,et al.  Enzyme‐linked Immunosorbent Assay of Pro‐gastrin‐releasing Peptide for Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Comparison with Neuron‐specific Enolase Measurement , 1995, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[36]  F. Laval,et al.  Plasma DNA as a marker of cancerous cell death. Investigations in patients suffering from lung cancer and in nude mice bearing human tumours. , 1995, Cancer letters.

[37]  H Dienemann,et al.  CYFRA 21‐1: A new marker in lung cancer , 1993, Cancer.

[38]  C. Steinman,et al.  Haemodialysis as a model for studying endogenous plasma DNA: oligonucleosome‐like structure and clearance , 1992, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[39]  A. Maebo,et al.  [Plasma DNA level as a tumor marker in primary lung cancer]. , 1990, Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai zasshi.

[40]  K. Feldmann,et al.  Nucleosomes and CYFRA 21-1 indicate tumor response after one cycle of chemotherapy in recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. , 2009, Lung cancer.

[41]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2007 , 2007, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[42]  J. Petrik,et al.  National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Guidelines for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer , 2007 .

[43]  D. Ettinger,et al.  Small cell lung cancer clinical practice guidelines in oncology. , 2006, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[44]  T. Godfrey,et al.  Quantitative analysis of circulating plasma DNA as a tumor marker in thoracic malignancies. , 2005, Clinical chemistry.

[45]  U. Pastorino,et al.  Detecting lung cancer in plasma with the use of multiple genetic markers , 2004, International journal of cancer.

[46]  B. Yalcin,et al.  Multidisciplinary management of lung cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[47]  J. Schneider,et al.  Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in therapy control of patients with small-cell lung cancer. , 2003, Clinical laboratory.

[48]  B. Vojtesek,et al.  Release of cytokeratin‐18 and ‐19 fragments (TPS and CYFRA 21‐1) into the extracellular space during apoptosis , 2002, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[49]  R. Molina,et al.  Study of a new tumor marker, CYFRA 21-1, in malignant and nonmalignant diseases. , 1994, Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine.

[50]  A. Miller,et al.  Reporting results of cancer treatment , 1981, Cancer.