Relatedness influences signal reliability in evolving robots

Communication is an indispensable component of animal societies, yet many open questions remain regarding the factors affecting the evolution and reliability of signalling systems. A potentially important factor is the level of genetic relatedness between signallers and receivers. To quantitatively explore the role of relatedness in the evolution of reliable signals, we conducted artificial evolution over 500 generations in a system of foraging robots that can emit and perceive light signals. By devising a quantitative measure of signal reliability, and comparing independently evolving populations differing in within-group relatedness, we show a strong positive correlation between relatedness and reliability. Unrelated robots produced unreliable signals, whereas highly related robots produced signals that reliably indicated the location of the food source and thereby increased performance. Comparisons across populations also revealed that the frequency for signal production—which is often used as a proxy of signal reliability in empirical studies on animal communication—is a poor predictor of signal reliability and, accordingly, is not consistently correlated with group performance. This has important implications for our understanding of signal evolution and the empirical tools that are used to investigate communication.

[1]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[2]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  A. Zahavi.  Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  C. Dunford.  Kin Selection for Ground Squirrel Alarm Calls , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[5]  J. Tukey,et al.  Variations of Box Plots , 1978 .

[6]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Vervet monkey alarm calls: Manipulation through shared information? , 1985 .

[7]  John Maynard Smith.  Honest signalling: the Philip Sidney game , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  A. Grafen,et al.  The continuous Sir Philip Sidney game: a simple model of biological signalling. , 1992, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Chick begging as a signal: are nestlings honest? , 1996 .

[10]  Amots Zehavi,et al.  The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle , 1997 .

[11]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Signaling among relatives. III. Talk is cheap. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Richard-Yris,et al.  Maternal food calling in domestic hens: influence of feeding context. , 2003, Comptes rendus biologies.

[13]  S. Nowicki,et al.  The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems , 2005 .

[14]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Perception Space—The Final Frontier , 2005, PLoS biology.

[15]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[16]  M. Surette,et al.  Communication in bacteria: an ecological and evolutionary perspective , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[17]  L. Keller,et al.  The evolution of cooperation and altruism – a general framework and a classification of models , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[18]  M. Whiting,et al.  Natural Selection on Social Signals: Signal Efficacy and the Evolution of Chameleon Display Coloration , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[19]  D. Floreano,et al.  Evolutionary Conditions for the Emergence of Communication in Robots , 2007, Current Biology.

[20]  A. Griffin,et al.  Social semantics : altruism , cooperation , mutualism , strong reciprocity and group selection , 2007 .

[21]  M. Cummings.  SENSORY TRADE-OFFS PREDICT SIGNAL DIVERGENCE IN SURFPERCH , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  T. Scott-Phillips.  Defining biological communication , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[23]  G. Boncoraglio,et al.  Fine-tuned modulation of competitive behaviour according to kinship in barn swallow nestlings , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  D. Floreano,et al.  The evolution of information suppression in communicating robots with conflicting interests , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  T. Redondo,et al.  Signalling of Nutritional Need by Magpie Nestlings , 2010 .