Investigation of peptide reactivity of pro-hapten skin sensitizers using a peroxidase-peroxide oxidation system.

Skin protein reactivity is a well established key step in the development of skin sensitization. Understanding the relationship between a chemical's ability to react with or modify skin protein and skin sensitization has led to the development of the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA) in our laboratory. A current limitation of the DPRA is that it cannot readily measure the reactivity of pro-hapten chemical sensitizers. Pro-haptens are chemical sensitizers that are not directly reactive and must be bioactivated in vivo to form an electrophilic intermediate(s). Results from this work demonstrate the utility of using horseradish peroxidase and hydrogen peroxide (HRP/P) for assessing the skin sensitization potential of pro-haptens. In comparison with "direct" reactivity assessments without HRP/P, statistically significant increases in peptide depletion for all pro-haptens examined were observed following coincubation with HRP/P. Conversely, the percent peptide depletion for all pre-haptens was equally high (> 40% depletion) with and without HRP/P demonstrating an auto-oxidation pathway. In contrast, peptide depletion for all nonsensitizing chemicals examined was low with and without HRP/P. The optimal HRP/P concentrations, incubation time and optimal peptide:chemical ratio were determined using a sensitive and selective high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry detection method. Dithiothreitol was incorporated to reverse the dimerization of the thiol-containing cysteine peptide nucleophile. This preliminary work shows the potential to incorporate an enzyme-mediated activation step for pro-haptens into an in chemico skin sensitization assay that results in the detection of all types of sensitizers.

[1]  J. Uetrecht,et al.  Myeloperoxidase-mediated activation of xenobiotics by human leukocytes. , 1993, Toxicology.

[2]  C. Hansson,et al.  Reactivity of Contact Allergenic Haptens to Amino Acid Residues in a Model Carrier Peptide, and Characterization of Formed Peptide-Hapten Adducts1 , 2003, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[3]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Compilation of Historical Local Lymph Node Data for Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternative Methods , 2005, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[4]  D W Roberts,et al.  Skin sensitization to eugenol and isoeugenol in mice: possible metabolic pathways involving ortho-quinone and quinone methide intermediates. , 1997, Chemical research in toxicology.

[5]  T. Eling,et al.  Prostaglandin H synthase and xenobiotic oxidation. , 1990, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[6]  A. Natsch,et al.  Utility and limitations of a peptide reactivity assay to predict fragrance allergens in vitro. , 2007, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[7]  M. Barratt,et al.  Studies of the chemical selectivity of hapten, reactivity, and skin sensitization potency. 1. Synthesis and studies on the reactivity toward model nucleophiles of the (13)C-labeled skin sensitizers hex-1-ene- and hexane-1,3-sultones. , 2001, Chemical research in toxicology.

[8]  K. Landsteiner,et al.  STUDIES ON THE SENSITIZATION OF ANIMALS WITH SIMPLE CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS. II , 1936, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  Silvia Casati,et al.  Chemical reactivity measurement and the predicitve identification of skin sensitisers. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 64. , 2008, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[10]  L. Marnett,et al.  Comparison of the Peroxidase Activity of Hemoproteins and Cytochrome P450 , 1995 .

[11]  Jun Guo,et al.  Cyclosporin A impairs dendritic cell migration by regulating chemokine receptor expression and inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2 expression. , 2004, Blood.

[12]  Ortiz de Montellano,et al.  Cytochrome P-450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry , 1986 .

[13]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Quantification of chemical peptide reactivity for screening contact allergens: a classification tree model approach. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[14]  I Kimber,et al.  Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals. , 2003, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[15]  Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin,et al.  Studies of chemical selectivity of hapten, reactivity, and skin sensitization potency. 3. Synthesis and studies on the reactivity toward model nucleophiles of the 13C-labeled skin sensitizers, 5-chloro-2-methylisothiazol-3-one (MCI) and 2-methylisothiazol-3-one (MI). , 2003, Chemical research in toxicology.

[16]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Hapten–protein binding: from theory to practical application in the in vitro prediction of skin sensitization , 2005, Contact dermatitis.

[17]  Petra S Kern,et al.  Mechanistic applicability domain classification of a local lymph node assay dataset for skin sensitization. , 2007, Chemical research in toxicology.

[18]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  High throughput kinetic profiling approach for covalent binding to peptides: application to skin sensitization potency of Michael acceptor electrophiles. , 2009, Chemical research in toxicology.

[19]  Jaewon Lee,et al.  Mitochondrial ATP synthase is a target for TNBS‐induced protein carbonylation in XS‐106 dendritic cells , 2008, Proteomics.

[20]  K. Landsteiner,et al.  STUDIES ON THE SENSITIZATION OF ANIMALS WITH SIMPLE CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS , 1935, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[21]  D A Basketter,et al.  Contact allergy: the role of skin chemistry and metabolism , 2003, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[22]  H. Merk,et al.  A skin-like cytochrome P450 cocktail activates prohaptens to contact allergenic metabolites. , 2007, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[23]  T. Ryan,et al.  Urticaria and fibrinolysis * , 1977, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[24]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  LC-MS-based characterization of the peptide reactivity of chemicals to improve the in vitro prediction of the skin sensitization potential. , 2008, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[25]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Non-enzymatic glutathione reactivity and in vitro toxicity: a non-animal approach to skin sensitization. , 2006, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[26]  T W Schultz,et al.  Structure–activity relationships for reactivity of carbonyl-containing compounds with glutathione , 2005, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[27]  Sue Gibbs,et al.  Xenobiotic metabolism in human skin and 3D human skin reconstructs: a review. , 2007, Current drug metabolism.

[28]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[29]  J. Lepoittevin Metabolism versus chemical transformation or pro‐ versus prehaptens? , 2006, Contact dermatitis.

[30]  G. Dupuis,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis to simple chemicals : a molecular approach , 1982 .

[31]  Maja Aleksic,et al.  Reactivity profiling: covalent modification of single nucleophile peptides for skin sensitization risk assessment. , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[32]  A. Lazarov European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7‐year period from 1998 to 2004 , 2006, Contact dermatitis.

[33]  Y. Fukumori,et al.  Peptide-binding assessment using mass spectrometry as a new screening method for skin sensitization. , 2003, The Journal of toxicological sciences.