Adaptive video streaming uploading with moving prediction in VANETs scenarios

Video streaming uploading service over Vehicular Networks is very useful as it can support many applications. Due to the vehicle's high mobility and roadside access point (AP)'s sparse deployment, how to provide a high-quality video service with a low-price charge still remains an open question. To address this issue, a novel video uploading scheme based on vehicle moving prediction is proposed, in which the vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) and vehicle-to-vehicle communications (V2V) are cooperated to forward video streaming continuously from the moving vehicles to a fixed network. We make use of vehicle mobility prediction to find the stable relay nodes and reduce the link failure frequency, while an adaptive selection algorithm is used for roadside APs and gateway-vehicles to reduce the charge for video uploading. Experimental results show that the proposed scheme can achieve good performance while keeping a low application charge.

[1]  Nen-Fu Huang,et al.  Delivering of Live Video Streaming for Vehicular Communication Using Peer-to-Peer Approach , 2007, 2007 Mobile Networking for Vehicular Environments.

[2]  Brad Karp,et al.  GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[3]  Jing Zhao,et al.  VADD: Vehicle-Assisted Data Delivery in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[4]  Lin Cai,et al.  Adaptive video streaming with inter-vehicle relay for highway VANET scenario , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[5]  Jing Zhao,et al.  VADD: Vehicle-Assisted Data Delivery in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2008, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[6]  Kien A. Hua,et al.  Performance Study of Live Video Streaming Over Highway Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2007, 2007 IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[7]  Adel Javanmard,et al.  Mobility Modeling, Spatial Traffic Distribution, and Probability of Connectivity for Sparse and Dense Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[8]  John Lee,et al.  A survey and challenges in routing and data dissemination in vehicular ad-hoc networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety.

[9]  John Lee,et al.  A survey and challenges in routing and data dissemination in vehicular ad-hoc networks , 2008, ICVES.

[10]  Xuemin Shen,et al.  Impact of Network Dynamics on User's Video Quality: Analytical Framework and QoS Provision , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[11]  Frank H. P. Fitzek,et al.  Traffic Analysis and Video Quality Evaluation of Multiple Description Coded Video Services for Fourth Generation Wireless IP Networks , 2005, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[12]  Yevgeni Koucheryavy,et al.  An Overtaking Assistance System Based on Joint Beaconing and Real-Time Video Transmission , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[13]  Paolo Barsocchi,et al.  Frame error model in rural Wi-Fi networks , 2007, 2007 5th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks and Workshops.

[14]  Hussein Dia,et al.  Comparative evaluation of microscopic car-following behavior , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[15]  B. Girod,et al.  MINIMIZING DISTORTION FOR MULTIPATH VIDEO STREAMING OVER AD HOC NETWORKS , .

[16]  Brad Karp,et al.  GPSR : Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless , 2000, MobiCom 2000.

[17]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Car-following: a historical review , 1999 .

[18]  Nitin H. Vaidya,et al.  A vehicle-to-vehicle communication protocol for cooperative collision warning , 2004, The First Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services, 2004. MOBIQUITOUS 2004..