Symmetry difference electrical impedance tomography—a novel modality for anomaly detection

OBJECTIVE The theoretical basis, experimental implementation, and proof of concept of a novel electrical impedance tomography (EIT) imaging technique, called symmetry difference EIT, is described. This technique is applicable in situations where there is inherent symmetry in the region being imaged. METHODS The sample scenario of the human head is used to describe the technique. The head is largely symmetrical across the sagittal plane. A unilateral lesion such as a haemorrhage or region of ischaemia distorts that symmetry. This distortion may be visualised using EIT. Measurement sets from a ring of electrodes placed on the boundary in both clockwise and counter-clockwise orientations are compared to detect the anomaly. Computer simulations featuring a hemispherical model of the head and brain are used initially to demonstrate the theory. Then, a more complex numerical model with anatomically accurate finite element models (FEMs) is used to expand on the concept with a more realistic scenario. Finally, tank experiments are performed with phantom lesions to validate the technique in the real world. RESULTS Deviations from normal symmetry, due to the presence of lesions, are detectable using this new modality. The ease of detection improves with larger lesions and those far from the plane of symmetry. Quantitative metrics, as well as an image, help to robustly detect and identify both the presence of an abnormality and the cause (haemorrhagic or ischaemic lesion in the scenarios tested) or indeed indicate where no detection is possible. CONCLUSION Symmetry difference EIT is a valuable new modality that is applicable to cases where the 'normal' features symmetry across a plane. Significantly, a change in the region of interest is not required and hence this technique may be suited to static or quasi-static cases where time difference EIT cannot be used.

[1]  David Holder,et al.  Are patient specific meshes required for EIT head imaging? , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[2]  Andy Adler,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography: Tissue Properties to Image Measures , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  R. Rey,et al.  Multiple simultaneous intracerebral hemorrhages: clinical features and outcome. , 2001, Archives of neurology.

[4]  Andy Adler,et al.  Why is EIT so hard, and what are we doing about it? , 2015, Physiological measurement.

[5]  K R Lees,et al.  Acute stroke , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[7]  Brian McGinley,et al.  Stable tissue-mimicking materials and an anatomically realistic, adjustable head phantom for electrical impedance tomography , 2017 .

[8]  Marc Modat,et al.  A method for rapid production of subject specific finite element meshes for electrical impedance tomography of the human head , 2012, Physiological measurement.

[9]  C. Gabriel,et al.  Electrical conductivity of tissue at frequencies below 1 MHz , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  B H Brown,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography (EIT): a review , 2003, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[11]  A. Villringer,et al.  Stroke Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Accurate in Hyperacute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Study on the Validity of Stroke Imaging , 2004, Stroke.

[12]  Eugenijus Kaniusas,et al.  Evaluation of reconstruction parameters of electrical impedance tomography on aorta detection during saline bolus injection , 2016 .

[13]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Multiple acute stroke syndrome , 2000, Neurology.

[14]  A Tizzard,et al.  Generating accurate finite element meshes for the forward model of the human head in EIT , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[15]  David S. Holder Electrical impedance tomography , 2005 .

[16]  Thomas C. Ferrée,et al.  Weighted regularization in electrical impedance tomography with applications to acute cerebral stroke , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Christophe Geuzaine,et al.  Gmsh: A 3‐D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities , 2009 .

[18]  M. Vangel,et al.  ABC/2 for rapid clinical estimate of infarct, perfusion, and mismatch volumes , 2009, Neurology.

[19]  A. Newberg,et al.  Neuroimaging in traumatic brain imaging , 2005, NeuroRX.

[20]  Laurent Mottron,et al.  Head Circumference in Canadian Male Adults: Development of a Normalized Chart , 2012 .

[21]  Francesco Setti,et al.  Groups and Crowds: Behaviour Analysis of People Aggregations , 2016, VISIGRAPP.

[22]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  Uses and abuses of EIDORS: an extensible software base for EIT , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[23]  Andy Adler,et al.  The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images , 2011, Physiological measurement.

[24]  Andy Adler,et al.  FEM electrode refinement for electrical impedance tomography , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[25]  Tracy R. Henderson,et al.  Simple metric for scaling motor threshold based on scalp-cortex distance: application to studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications , 2004 .

[27]  G. Manley,et al.  The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. , 2001, Stroke.

[28]  James Avery,et al.  A Versatile and Reproducible Multi-Frequency Electrical Impedance Tomography System , 2017, Sensors.