Radiation Risks From Cardiovascular Imaging Tests

A 62-year-old retired account executive complains of diffuse chest pain with moderate activity. His hypercholesterolemia and hypertension have been well controlled. On treadmill testing, he fatigues at a heart rate of 140 bpm. You discuss the option of a pharmacological stress radionuclide study, but his reaction is concern. When questioned, he divulges that he and his wife had recently read an article in a popular lifestyle magazine that warned that “such tests cause cancer.” The concept of radiation, a physical entity that penetrates the human body yet defies perception, is emotionally laden and triggers archetypical angst in many. In recent years, a considerable number of alarmist reports have raised the specter of cancer risk from commonly prescribed imaging tests.1–3 These publications have received widespread dissemination in the lay media, often in a sensationalist manner, so medical professionals are increasingly confronted by the above patient scenario and its many variations. Public concerns have prompted the US Food and Drug Administration to devote considerable attention to radiation protection, and some states have mandated reporting of radiation doses from imaging examinations. The purposes of this Clinician Update are to summarize the evidence on stochastic risks from diagnostic cardiovascular imaging tests involving ionizing radiation, to enable a realistic appraisal of risk, and to facilitate a rational dialog between healthcare providers and their patients. Direct evidence for an association between radiation from medical imaging and cancer induction is exceedingly scarce. The most convincing evidence is derived from 2 recent, large, epidemiological studies in young, predominantly pediatric populations.4,5 Based on ≈10 year follow-up of 178 000 and 680 000 children and adolescents, respectively, these studies report an incremental risk of ≈2 to 6 excess cancers per 10 000 children and young adults from computed tomography (CT). Direct evidence of an …

[1]  J. Mathews,et al.  Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians , 2013, BMJ.

[2]  Bob Liu,et al.  Body CT scanning in young adults: examination indications, patient outcomes, and risk of radiation-induced cancer. , 2013, Radiology.

[3]  K. P. Kim,et al.  Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study , 2012, The Lancet.

[4]  William R Hendee,et al.  Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy. , 2012, Radiology.

[5]  A. Einstein,et al.  Cardiac imaging: does radiation matter? , 2012, European heart journal.

[6]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of different pulmonary CTA protocols on a 128-slice CT: high-pitch dual source CT, dual energy CT and conventional spiral CT , 2012, European Radiology.

[7]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: second-generation dual-source CT versus single-source 64-MDCT and first-generation dual-source CT. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: a population-based analysis. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  R. Smith-Bindman Is computed tomography safe? , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  L. Feinendegen,et al.  Low-level ionizing radiation from noninvasive cardiac imaging: can we extrapolate estimated risks from epidemiologic data to the clinical setting? , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[11]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  In defense of body CT. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  R. Morin,et al.  Ionizing Radiation in Cardiac Imaging: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention , 2009, Circulation.

[14]  W. Huda,et al.  Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. , 2008, Radiology.

[15]  A. Einstein,et al.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, JAMA.

[16]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  American Association of Physicists in Medicine , 2014 .

[17]  Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation : BEIR VII Phase 2 4 / 10 / 2011 , 2011 .

[18]  Kevin M. Nelson,et al.  HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY , 2007 .