Thickness sensitivity of ultrasound velocity in long bone phantoms.

One approach to bone disease diagnosis such as osteoporosis is to measure the velocity of ultrasound propagating axially along long bones. In this study, the variation in velocity as a function of radial position was assessed using two polyvinyl chloride (PVC) bone phantoms with cross-sectional geometry similar to the human tibia but differing in medullary cavity diameter. Two ultrasonometers were used: these were a commercial device operating at a relatively high frequency (HF) of 1.25 MHz and a prototype low frequency (LF) device operating at approximately 200 kHz. The LF measurements showed a larger variation with radial position, with changes in velocity of up to 20% occurring around the phantom compared with changes of only 4% at most for HF. The LF velocity correlated strongly with local thickness (r(2) = 0.81) but HF velocity did not. The results demonstrate that LF measurements have a greatly enhanced thickness sensitivity. Using LF, it may therefore be possible to assess bone thickness as a function of radial position and hence to determine the distribution of bone around the long axis.

[1]  Tommi Kärkkäinen,et al.  Guided ultrasonic waves in long bones: modelling, experiment and in vivo application. , 2002, Physiological measurement.

[2]  G. W. Hyatt,et al.  Ultrasonic study of normal and fractured bone. , 1975, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  F. Patat,et al.  Bidirectional axial transmission can improve accuracy and precision of ultrasonic velocity measurement in cortical bone: a validation on test materials , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  H K Genant,et al.  An in vitro investigation of the dependence on sample thickness of the speed of sound along the specimen. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  Maryline Talmant,et al.  Three-dimensional simulations of ultrasonic axial transmission velocity measurement on cortical bone models. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  G Van der Perre,et al.  The effect of fracture and fracture fixation on ultrasonic velocity and attenuation. , 1996, Physiological measurement.

[7]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Ultrasound velocity measurement in long bones: measurement method and simulation of ultrasound wave propagation. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  J. Timonen,et al.  Assessment of the tibia using ultrasonic guided waves in pubertal girls , 2003, Osteoporosis International.

[9]  D. Hans,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound of the Tibia Depends on Both Cortical Density and Thickness , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[10]  I. Siegel,et al.  The determination of fracture healing by measurement of sound velocity across the fracture site. , 1958, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[11]  S. Cheng,et al.  Ultrasound Velocity and Cortical Bone Characteristics In Vivo , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[12]  G Berger,et al.  Analysis of the axial transmission technique for the assessment of skeletal status. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  E. Bossy,et al.  Effect of bone cortical thickness on velocity measurements using ultrasonic axial transmission: a 2D simulation study. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.