Correlation of Device landing zone calcification and acute procedural success in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantations with the self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the influence of amount and distribution of calcifications of the aortic valve and the left ventricular outflow tract on the acute procedural outcome of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a new percutaneous technique especially for elderly, high-risk patients with significant aortic valve stenosis (AS). After TAVI, post-interventional paravalvular aortic regurgitations (PAR) can occur, which is believed to be related partially to valve calcifications. METHODS We prospectively analyzed 100 symptomatic patients with severe AS scheduled for TAVI with the CoreValve ReValving (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) prosthesis. In all patients, a native and contrast-enhanced multislice cardiac computed tomography was performed pre-interventionally. Calcification load of the valve and the adjacent outflow tract was estimated by the Agatston Score (AgS), and the amount and distribution of calcification was semi-quantitatively assessed and graded on a 1 to 4 scale (device "landing zone" calcification score [DLZ-CS]). Aortography was performed to evaluate the PAR pre-interventionally, after initial device release (PAR0) and after termination of the procedure (PAR1). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed 2 weeks after implantation (PAR2). RESULTS The AgS and DLZ-CS showed a significant correlation with the grade of PAR0 (AgS: r = 0.329, p = 0.001; DLZ-CS: r = 0.356, p < 0.001), PAR1 (AgS: r = 0.254, p = 0.011; DLZ-CS: r = 0.240, p = 0.016), and PAR2 (AgS: r = 0.341, p = 0.001; DLZ-CS: r = 0.300, p = 0.002). Both scores (AgS and DLZ-CS) showed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.858, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Calcification in the CoreValve device "landing zone" shows a significant positive correlation to PAR after TAVI. Furthermore, the need for "second maneuvers" (i.e., post-dilation after initial device release) can be predicted by these calcification scores (AgS and DLZ-CS).

[1]  E. Grube,et al.  Der perkutane Aortenklappenersatz - ein Update , 2008 .

[2]  N. Al-Attar,et al.  Transcatheter valve implantation for patients with aortic stenosis: a position statement from the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). , 2008, European heart journal.

[3]  F. Loop,et al.  Aortic valve replacement for octogenarians: are small valves bad? , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Aortic valve calcification as quantified with multislice computed tomography predicts short-term clinical outcome in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. , 2006, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[5]  Woodring Jh,et al.  CT of aortic and mitral valve calcification. , 1989 .

[6]  Thomas Walther,et al.  Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  William Grossman,et al.  Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography, and Intervention , 1990 .

[8]  S. Brener,et al.  Factors leading to progression of valvular aortic stenosis. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  Thomas Felderhoff,et al.  Percutaneous Implantation of the CoreValve Self-Expanding Valve Prosthesis in High-Risk Patients With Aortic Valve Disease: The Siegburg First-in-Man Study , 2006 .

[10]  S. Davies,et al.  Progression of valvar aortic stenosis: a long-term retrospective study. , 1991, European heart journal.

[11]  L. Cohn,et al.  Impact of small prosthetic valve size on operative mortality in elderly patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: does gender matter? , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  J. Webb.  Percutaneous aortic valve replacement will become a common treatment for aortic valve disease. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[13]  A. Mazzucco,et al.  Risk factors for coronary complications after stentless aortic root replacement. , 1999, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  O. Levang.  [Aortic valve surgery in the elderly]. , 1999, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[15]  J. Webb.  Percutaneous aortic valve replacement , 2008, Current cardiology reports.

[16]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  G. Porenta,et al.  Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis , 2001 .

[18]  D. Behrendt,et al.  Should a bicuspid aortic valve be replaced in the presence of subvalvar or supravalvar aortic stenosis? , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  G. Plotnick,et al.  Calcification of aortic valve detected incidentally on CT scans: prevalence and clinical significance. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  M. Enriquez-Sarano,et al.  Evaluation and Clinical Implications of Aortic Valve Calcification Measured by Electron-Beam Computed Tomography , 2004, Circulation.

[21]  Lukas Altwegg,et al.  Percutaneous Transarterial Aortic Valve Replacement in Selected High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis , 2007, Circulation.

[22]  EberhardGrube,et al.  Progress and Current Status of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement: Results of Three Device Generations of the CoreValve Revalving System , 2008 .

[23]  R. Autschbach,et al.  Quantification of Aortic Valve Calcification Using Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography: Comparison With Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[24]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcification in aortic stenosis. , 2002, Radiology.

[25]  Assaf Bash,et al.  Percutaneous Transcatheter Implantation of an Aortic Valve Prosthesis for Calcific Aortic Stenosis: First Human Case Description , 2002, Circulation.

[26]  S. Baredes,et al.  18F-FDG PET evaluation of sinonasal papilloma. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Quantification of Aortic Valve Calcification With Electron Beam Tomography: A Histomorphometric Validation Study , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[28]  J. Leipsic,et al.  The evolving role of MDCT in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a radiologists' perspective. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.