Robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases: experience of Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive surgery has been the trend in various specialties and continues to evolve as new technology develops. The development of robotic surgery in gynecology remains in its infancy. The present study reports the first descriptive series of robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases in Taiwan. MATERIALS AND METHODS From March 2009 to February 2011, the records of patients undergoing robotic surgery using the da Vinci Surgical System were reviewed for patient demographics, indications, operative time, hospital stay, conversion to laparotomy, and complications. RESULTS Sixty cases were reviewed in the present study. Forty-nine patients had benign gynecologic diseases, and 11 patients had malignancies. These robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures include nine hysterectomy, 15 subtotal hysterectomy, 13 myomectomy, eight staging operation, two radical hysterectomy, five ovarian cystectomy, one bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and myomectomy, two resections of deep pelvic endometriosis, one pelvic adhesiolysis, three sacrocolpopexy and one tuboplasty. Thirty-three patients had prior pelvic surgery, and one had a history of pelvic radiotherapy. Adhesiolysis was necessary in 38 patients to complete the whole operation. Robotic myomectomy was easily accomplished in patients with huge uterus or multiple myomas. The suturing of myometrium or cervical stump after ligation of the uterine arteries minimized the blood loss. In addition, it was much easier to dissect severe pelvic adhesions. The dissection of para-aortic lymph nodes can be easily accomplished. All these surgeries were performed smoothly without ureteral, bladder or bowel injury. CONCLUSION The present analyses include various complicated gynecologic conditions, which make the estimation of the effectiveness of robotic surgery in each situation individually not appropriate. However, our experiences do show that robotic surgery is feasible and safe for patients with complicated gynecologic diseases.

[1]  M. Paraiso,et al.  Laparoscopic and Abdominal Sacral Colpopexies: A Comparative Cohort Study , 2006 .

[2]  V. Abeler,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection--case report. , 2006, European journal of gynaecological oncology.

[3]  P. Gehrig,et al.  What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? , 2008, Gynecologic oncology.

[4]  Ceana Nezhat,et al.  Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. , 2009, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[5]  Arnold P. Advincula,et al.  The Use of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the Patient With a Scarred or Obliterated Anterior Cul-de-sac , 2005, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[6]  Wisner Kl,et al.  Incidence and Characteristics of Patients With Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence After Robotic Procedures , 2009 .

[7]  O. Lavie,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: scientific dream or reality? , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  G. Wegienka,et al.  Analysis of the impact of body mass index on the surgical outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. , 2009, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[9]  R. Tozzi,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological cancers in obese women. , 2010, Maturitas.

[10]  S. Guerriero,et al.  Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  D. Rattner,et al.  Robotics and ergonomics. , 2003, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[12]  Sert Bm,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection--case report. , 2006 .

[13]  T. Tillmanns,et al.  A Multiinstitutional Experience With Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy With Staging for Endometrial Cancer , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  R Kevin Reynolds,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[15]  A. Advincula,et al.  Preliminary Experience With Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Staging of Gynecologic Malignancies , 2005, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[16]  G. Phillips,et al.  Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy? , 2009, Gynecologic oncology.

[17]  F. Nezhat,et al.  Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature. , 2009, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[18]  T. Randall,et al.  Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center. , 2010, Gynecologic oncology.

[19]  C. Nezhat,et al.  Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[20]  M. Milad,et al.  Risk factors for conversion to laparotomy during gynecologic laparoscopy. , 2002, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[21]  Jennifer M Wu,et al.  Short-Term Outcomes of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Compared With Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  Z. Holub [Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: scientific dream or reality?]. , 2007, Ceska gynekologie.

[23]  P. Gehrig,et al.  Perioperative Outcomes of Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Cases With Complex Pathology , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  K. Kluivers,et al.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[25]  D. Barlow,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[26]  J. Coste,et al.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: preoperative risk factors for conversion to laparotomy. , 2004, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[27]  G. Phillips,et al.  A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. , 2009, Gynecologic oncology.

[28]  J. Thigpen Laparoscopy Compared With Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2 , 2010 .

[29]  M S Rogers,et al.  A randomized prospective study of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the management of benign ovarian masses. , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  R Kevin Reynolds,et al.  Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. , 2004, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[31]  B. Noble,et al.  Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.