Forging a Path: Faculty Interviews on the Present and Future of Computer Science Education in the United States

Computer science education (CSEd) is a growing interdisciplinary area that continues to gain momentum from students, researchers, and educators. Yet, there are few formal programs or degree options for students interested in pursuing graduate work in CSEd. This article explores the existing state of CSEd in the United States (U.S.) through semi-structured interviews with (n = 15) faculty engaged in CSEd research. Thematic coding of the transcripts revealed the complexities involved in the development of formal programs, the distinct considerations for faculty, and the value of having strong ties to both computer science and education. The themes described positive aspects of support and cohesion within the larger community and opportunities to expand knowledge across fields. Applying Cornell and Parker’s principles of interdisciplinary science to the field of CSEd, we provide recommendations for ways forward and discuss the potential impact on institutional structures, research capacity, individual and group identities, and teaching and learning. The findings from this investigation not only inform on the present state of CSEd in the U.S., but also offer guidance for CSEd-focused graduate programs.

[1]  D. Guillemette.  The theory of objectification: a Vygotskian perspective on knowing and becoming in mathematics teaching and learning , 2022, Research in Mathematics Education.

[2]  Melanie E. Peffer,et al.  Challenges facing interdisciplinary researchers: Findings from a professional development workshop , 2022, PloS one.

[3]  Jeffrey C. Carver,et al.  A Systematic Literature Review of Empiricism and Norms of Reporting in Computing Education Research Literature , 2021, ACM Trans. Comput. Educ..

[4]  Jacqueline L. Whalley,et al.  Scientific Collaboration Network Analysis for Computing Education Conferences , 2021, ITiCSE.

[5]  Nishant Balakrishnan,et al.  THE GRADUATE SPECIALIZATION IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION , 2021, Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA).

[6]  Stephanie Lunn,et al.  Where is Computer Science Education Research Happening? , 2021, SIGCSE.

[7]  Allyson Flaster,et al.  Transition points: well-being and disciplinary identity in the first years of doctoral studies , 2021, Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education.

[8]  Winslow D. Hansen,et al.  Supporting interdisciplinary careers for sustainability , 2021, Nature Sustainability.

[9]  Margaret L. Kern,et al.  Belonging: a review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research , 2021, Australian journal of psychology.

[10]  Adam S. Masters,et al.  Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community , 2021, Journal of Engineering Education.

[11]  R. R. Haccoun,et al.  Investigating the impact of advisor support on the perceptions of graduate students , 2020, Teaching in Higher Education.

[12]  Olivia del Giorgio,et al.  Building capacity through interdisciplinary graduate collaboration , 2020 .

[13]  David A. Joyner,et al.  Building an Infrastructure for Computer Science Education Research and Practice at Scale , 2020, L@S.

[14]  Simon,et al.  Computing Education Research Landscape through an Analysis of Keywords , 2020, ICER.

[15]  M. Boon,et al.  Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support , 2020, Journal of Engineering Education.

[16]  Jill Denner,et al.  Who Has a Seat at the Table in CSed?: Rethinking Equity Through the Lens of Decision-making and Power in Computer Science Education Initiatives , 2020, SIGCSE.

[17]  Bor Luen Tang,et al.  A Reflective Account of a Research Ethics Course for an Interdisciplinary Cohort of Graduate Students , 2020, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[18]  Andrea Forte,et al.  Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research , 2019, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Amy J. Ko,et al.  A Systematic Investigation of Replications in Computing Education Research , 2019, ACM Trans. Comput. Educ..

[20]  Sarah Smith Heckman,et al.  SIGCSE technical symposium 2019 report , 2019, ACM SIGCSE Bull..

[21]  Briana B. Morrison,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research , 2019 .

[22]  A. Strong,et al.  Exercising professional autonomy: Doctoral students’ preparation for academic careers , 2018, Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education.

[23]  Sally Fincher,et al.  The International Computing Education Research (ICER) conference , 2018, Inroads.

[24]  Susan H. Rodger,et al.  Reflections on SIGCSE from the past 30 years , 2018, Inroads.

[25]  Amy J. Ko,et al.  On Use of Theory in Computing Education Research , 2018, ICER.

[26]  Jeffrey A. Phillips,et al.  Breaking Boundaries: Pressing Issues in Equity, Computing, and Problem-Solving in STEM Undergraduate Education , 2018, Journal of Research in STEM Education.

[27]  Santhosh Areekkuzhiyil.  Emergence of New Disciplines. , 2017 .

[28]  Deborah E. White,et al.  Thematic Analysis , 2017 .

[29]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Understanding student retention in computer science education: The role of environment, gains, barriers and usefulness , 2016, Education and Information Technologies.

[30]  Gudrun Nyunt,et al.  Asked More Often: Gender Differences in Faculty Workload in Research Universities and the Work Interactions That Shape Them , 2017 .

[31]  Karri A. Holley.  Interdisciplinary Curriculum and Learning in Higher Education , 2017 .

[32]  Tricia A. Seifert,et al.  Examining the Impact of Interdisciplinary Programs on Student Learning , 2017 .

[33]  Sara M. Galbraith,et al.  A Pedagogical Model for Team-Based, Problem-Focused Interdisciplinary Doctoral Education , 2016 .

[34]  Barbara Ericson,et al.  Broadening access to computing education state by state , 2016, Commun. ACM.

[35]  N. Stamp,et al.  Preparing Graduate Students and Undergraduates for Interdisciplinary Research , 2015 .

[36]  Lynita K. Newswander,et al.  Sustained Change: Institutionalizing Interdisciplinary Graduate Education , 2014 .

[37]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  A future for computing education research , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[38]  Lauri Malmi,et al.  Theoretical underpinnings of computing education research: what is the evidence? , 2014, ICER '14.

[39]  J. Walther,et al.  Understanding Interpretive Research Through the Lens of a Cultural Verfremdungseffekt , 2014 .

[40]  Donna S. Reese,et al.  Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research , 2014 .

[41]  Susan R. Singer,et al.  Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. , 2012 .

[42]  J. D. Wulfhorst,et al.  Enhancing Communication & Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research , 2013 .

[43]  Morgan M. Millar.  Interdisciplinary research and the early career: The effect of interdisciplinary dissertation research on career placement and publication productivity of doctoral graduates in the sciences , 2013 .

[44]  S. Myers,et al.  Using Mentoring Enactment Theory to Explore the Doctoral Student–Advisor Mentoring Relationship , 2012 .

[45]  Sven Hemlin,et al.  Collaboration and Competition in Research , 2012 .

[46]  Kathleen M. MacQueen,et al.  Applied Thematic Analysis , 2011 .

[47]  S. M. Merritt,et al.  A research doctorate for computing professionals , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[48]  Lynita K. Newswander,et al.  Student socialization in interdisciplinary doctoral education , 2011 .

[49]  V. Baker,et al.  Developmental networks and learning: toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study , 2010 .

[50]  Lauri Malmi,et al.  Have we missed something?: identifying missing types of research in computing education , 2010, ICER '10.

[51]  H. Biemans,et al.  Teaching and Learning in Interdisciplinary Higher Education: A Systematic Review , 2009 .

[52]  Maura Borrego,et al.  Preparing Graduate Engineering Students For Academia: Assessment Of A Teaching Fellowship , 2009 .

[53]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[54]  Judith Gal-Ezer,et al.  A model for high school computer science education: the four key elements that make it! , 2008, SIGCSE '08.

[55]  Milad Alemzadeh,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction: Overview on State of the Art , 2008 .

[56]  Orit Hazzan,et al.  Qualitative research in computer science education , 2006, SIGCSE '06.

[57]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[58]  Tony Clear,et al.  Multi-institutional, multi-national studies in CSEd Research: some design considerations and trade-offs , 2005, ICER '05.

[59]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[60]  M. Tedre,et al.  Computing Education Research Compiled: Keyword Trends, Building Blocks, Creators, and Dissemination , 2022, IEEE Access.

[61]  KerryAnn O’Meara,et al.  Doing, Caring, and Being: “Good” Mentoring and Its Role in the Socialization of Graduate Students of Color in STEM , 2020 .

[62]  S. Cornell,et al.  Rising to the Synthesis Challenge in Large-Program Interdisciplinary Science: The QUEST Experience , 2014 .

[63]  Juan E. Gilbert,et al.  Creating a Pipeline for African American Computing Science Faculty: An Innovative Faculty /Research Mentoring Program Model , 2014 .

[64]  Jeffrey E. Froyd,et al.  Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research: Chronological and Ontological Development of Engineering Education as a Field of Scientific Inquiry , 2014 .

[65]  Raymond Lister,et al.  The naughties in CSEd research: a retrospective. , 2010 .

[66]  E. Kleinberg.  Interdisciplinary Studies at a Crossroads , 2008 .

[67]  L. Eisenberg,et al.  Barriers to Interdisciplinary Research and Training , 2000 .

[68]  Ronald M. Baecker,et al.  Readings in human-computer interaction : toward the year 2000 , 1995 .

[69]  J. Klein,et al.  The Administration of Interdisciplinary Programs: Creating Climates for Change , 1990 .