A model for vehicle-induced non-tailpipe emissions of particles along Swedish roads

Abstract One of the most important parameters that controls the suspension of road dust particles in the air is road surface moisture. This is calculated every hour from a budget equation that takes into account precipitation, evaporation and runoff. During wet conditions a road dust layer is built up from road wear which strongly depends on the use of studded tyres and road sanding. The dust layer is reduced during dry road conditions by suspension of particles due to vehicle-induced turbulence. The dust layer is also reduced by wash-off due to precipitation. Direct non-tailpipe vehicle emissions due to the wear and tear of the road surface, brakes and tyres are accounted for in the traditional way as constant emission factors expressed as mass emitted per vehicle kilometre. The model results are compared with measurements from both a narrow street canyon in the city centre of Stockholm and from an open highway outside the city. The model is able to account for the main features in the day-to-day mean PM10 variability for the street canyon and for the highway. A peak in the PM10 concentration is typically observed in late winter and early spring in the Nordic countries where studded tyres are used. This behaviour is due to a combination of factors: frequent conditions with dry roads, high number of cars with studded tyres and an accumulated road dust layer that increases suspension of particles. The study shows that using a constant emission factor for PM10 or relating PM10 emissions to NOx cannot be used for prediction of day-to-day variations in PM10 concentrations in the traffic environments studied here. The model needs to describe variations in dust load, wetness of the road and how dust suspension interacts with these processes.

[1]  John G. Watson,et al.  Vehicle-based road dust emission measurement: I—methods and calibration , 2003 .

[2]  John A. Gillies,et al.  Vehicle-based road dust emission measurement (III):: effect of speed, traffic volume, location, and season on PM10 road dust emissions in the Treasure Valley, ID , 2003 .

[3]  Ruwim Berkowicz,et al.  OSPM - A Parameterised Street Pollution Model , 2000 .

[4]  C. Johansson,et al.  Emissions of metals and particulate matter due to wear of brake linings in Stockholm , 2002 .

[5]  H. Hansson,et al.  Speciation and origin of PM10 and PM2.5 in selected European cities , 2004 .

[6]  Stefan Gollvik,et al.  Mesan, an operational mesoscale analysis system , 2000 .

[7]  J. Chow,et al.  Sources and chemistry of PM10 aerosol in Santa Barbara County, CA , 1996 .

[8]  Glen R. Cass,et al.  SOURCES OF FINE ORGANIC AEROSOL. 3. ROAD DUST, TIRE DEBRIS, AND ORGANOMETALLIC BRAKE LINING DUST: ROADS AS SOURCES AND SINKS , 1993 .

[9]  Timo Mäkelä,et al.  Size and composition of airborne particles from pavement wear, tires, and traction sanding. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Christer Johansson,et al.  Comparative health impact assessment of local and regional particulate air pollutants in Scandinavia. , 2005 .

[11]  K. Conradsen,et al.  Net incoming radiation estimated from hourly global radiation and/or cloud observations , 1981 .

[12]  Christer Johansson,et al.  Simulation of NOx and ultrafine particles in a street canyon in Stockholm, Sweden , 2004 .

[13]  Akula Venkatram,et al.  A critique of empirical emission factor models: a case study of the AP-42 model for estimating PM10 emissions from paved roads , 2000 .

[14]  A Lohmeyer,et al.  ESTIMATION OF THE "NON EXHAUST PIPE" PM10 EMISSIONS OF STREETS FOR PRACTICAL TRAFFIC AIR POLLUTION MODELLING , 2002 .

[15]  Christopher A. Laroo,et al.  Brake Wear Particulate Matter Emissions , 2000 .

[16]  Hampden D. Kuhns,et al.  Vehicle-based road dust emission measurement—Part II: Effect of precipitation, wintertime road sanding, and street sweepers on inferred PM10 emission potentials from paved and unpaved roads , 2003 .

[17]  David Proffitt,et al.  Tailpipe, resuspended road dust, and brake-wear emission factors from on-road vehicles , 2003 .

[18]  Ari Karppinen,et al.  A semi-empirical model for urban PM10 concentrations, and its evaluation against data from an urban measurement network , 2001 .

[19]  H. L. Penman Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[20]  L Gidhagen,et al.  Model simulations of NOx and ultrafine particles close to a Swedish highway. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.