Developing drugs for developing countries.

Infectious and parasitic diseases create enormous health burdens, but because most of the people suffering from these diseases are poor, little is invested in developing treatments. We propose that developers of treatments for neglected diseases receive a "priority review voucher." The voucher could save an average of one year of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review and be sold by the developer to the manufacturer of a blockbuster drug. In a well-functioning market, the voucher would speed access to highly valued treatments. Thus, the voucher could benefit consumers in both developing and developed countries at relatively low cost to the taxpayer.

[1]  H. Grabowski,et al.  Spending on postapproval drug safety. , 2006, Health affairs.

[2]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  View from the Bench: Patents and Material Transfers , 2005, Science.

[3]  Jaideep P. Sundaram,et al.  Health Innovation Networks to Help Developing Countries Address Neglected Diseases , 2005, Science.

[4]  J. Bonner A cult pop doc , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  H. L. Lipton,et al.  Oxymoron no more: the potential of nonprofit drug companies to deliver on the promise of medicines for the developing world. , 2005, Health affairs.

[6]  Matthew W. Strobeck,et al.  Industry funding of the FDA: effects of PDUFA on approval times and withdrawal rates , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[7]  Zosia Kmietowicz,et al.  BMA Annual representative meeting, Manchester, 27 - 30 June: BMA conference fails to approve motion to abolish charges for BMJ online , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  H. Grabowski Encouraging the development of new vaccines. , 2005, Health affairs.

[9]  E. Berndt,et al.  Vaccine advance-purchase agreements for low-income countries: practical issues. , 2005, Health affairs.

[10]  A. Towse,et al.  Advance price or purchase commitments to create markets for treatments for diseases of poverty: lessons from three policies. , 2005, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[11]  Mary K Olson,et al.  Are novel drugs more risky for patients than less novel drugs? , 2004, Journal of health economics.

[12]  Henry G. Grabowski,et al.  R&D Costs and Returns by Therapeutic Category , 2004 .

[13]  A. Attaran How do patents and economic policies affect access to essential medicines in developing countries? , 2004, Health affairs.

[14]  K. Arrow New antimalarial drugs: biology and economics meet. , 2004 .

[15]  Sonja Marjanovic,et al.  Engaging biotechnology companies in the development of innovative solutions for diseases of poverty , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[16]  J. Stephenson World health report. , 2004, Lancet.

[17]  R. W. Hansen,et al.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[18]  C. Bell,et al.  Are pharmaceuticals cost-effective? A review of the evidence. , 2000, Health affairs.

[19]  David O. Meltzer,et al.  Do Important Drugs Reach the Market Sooner , 1994 .

[20]  Ralph Katz,et al.  How a Band of Technical Renegades Designed the Alpha Chip , 1993 .

[21]  Narrowing the gap. , 2007, AHIP Coverage.

[22]  M. Moran,et al.  Fast Track Options (FTO) as a fundraising mechanism to support R&D into Neglected Diseases , 2005 .

[23]  J. Lanjouw Opening Doors to Research: A New Global Patent Regime for Pharmaceuticals , 2003 .

[24]  Joshua Lederberg,et al.  Microbial Threats to Health: Emergence, Detection, and Response , 2003 .

[25]  Michael Kremer,et al.  Pharmaceuticals and the developing world. , 2002, The journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association.

[26]  H. Kettler Narrowing the Gap between provision and need for medicines in developing countries , 2000 .

[27]  Henry G. Grabowski,et al.  Effective patent life in pharmaceuticals , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..