Numerical Assessment of the Progressive Rock Fracture Mechanism of Cracked Chevron Notched Brazilian Disc Specimens

The International Society of Rock Mechanics (ISRM) suggested cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc method falls into a major testing category of rock fracture toughness measurement by virtue of chevron notched rock samples. A straight through crack front during the whole fracturing process is assumed in the testing principle but is never assessed. In this study, the progressive rock fracture mechanism of cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc rock specimens is numerically simulated for the first time. Two representative sample types with distinct geometry of notch ligaments are modelled. The assumption of a straight through crack front for chevron notched fracture samples is critically assessed. The results show that not only the notch tip but also the saw-cut chevron notch cracks during the experiments. The straight through crack front assumption is never satisfied in the realistic rock fracture progress of chevron notched disc samples. In addition, the crack features prominent curved front, far from being straight. In contrast to the sample type with narrow notch ligament, the acoustic emission (AE) of the simulation on the sample with wide notch ligament depicts obvious biased fracturing of the prescript fracturing route of the notch. The numerically observed progressive fracture mechanism calls for more attention on how to accurately calibrate the critical dimensionless stress intensity factor for a better measurement of Mode I fracture toughness via chevron notched samples.

[1]  I. L. Lim,et al.  Fracture testing of a soft rock with semi-circular specimens under three-point bending. Part 2—mixed-mode , 1994 .

[2]  Leslie George Tham,et al.  Numerical studies of the influence of microstructure on rock failure in uniaxial compression — Part I: effect of heterogeneity , 2000 .

[3]  M.R.M. Aliha,et al.  Typical Upper Bound–Lower Bound Mixed Mode Fracture Resistance Envelopes for Rock Material , 2011, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[5]  B. Mohanty,et al.  Fracture toughness anisotropy in granitic rocks , 2008 .

[6]  Y. Obara,et al.  ISRM-Suggested Method for Determining the Mode I Static Fracture Toughness Using Semi-Circular Bend Specimen , 2013, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[7]  Chun An Tang,et al.  The Dynamic Evaluation of Rock Slope Stability Considering the Effects of Microseismic Damage , 2014, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[8]  C. Tang,et al.  Numerical simulation of progressive rock failure and associated seismicity , 1997 .

[9]  Ernian Pan,et al.  Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Cracked Discs of Anisotropic Rock Using the Boundary Element Method , 1998 .

[10]  F. Ouchterlony.  Review of fracture toughness testing of rock , 1982 .

[11]  M. Kuruppu.  Fracture toughness measurement using chevron notched semi-circular bend specimen , 1997 .

[12]  H. Awaji,et al.  Combined Mode Fracture Toughness Measurement by the Disk Test , 1978 .

[13]  G. Szendi-Horvath.  Fracture toughness determination of brittle materials using small to extremely small specimens , 1980 .

[14]  Peter K. Kaiser,et al.  Numerical simulation of cumulative damage and seismic energy release during brittle rock failure-Part I: Fundamentals , 1998 .

[15]  Finn Ouchterlony,et al.  Suggested methods for determining the fracture toughness of rock , 1988 .

[16]  Sahel N. Abduljauwad,et al.  Effects of confining pressure and temperature on mixed-mode (I–II) fracture toughness of a limestone rock , 2000 .

[17]  M.R.M. Aliha,et al.  Geometry and size effects on fracture trajectory in a limestone rock under mixed mode loading , 2010 .

[18]  W. Weibull.  A statistical theory of the strength of materials , 1939 .

[19]  K. Xia,et al.  A Semi-Circular Bend Technique for Determining Dynamic Fracture Toughness , 2010 .

[20]  A. Baghbanan,et al.  Measuring fracture toughness of crystalline marbles under modes I and II and mixed mode I–II loading conditions using CCNBD and HCCD specimens , 2011 .

[21]  Chun An Tang,et al.  Microseismic monitoring and stability analysis of the left bank slope in Jinping first stage hydropower station in southwestern China , 2011 .

[22]  Vahab Sarfarazi,et al.  Mixed mode crack propagation in low brittle rock-like materials , 2013, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[23]  B. Mohanty,et al.  Experimental Calibration of ISRM Suggested Fracture Toughness Measurement Techniques in Selected Brittle Rocks , 2007 .

[24]  Wancheng Zhu,et al.  Numerical simulation on rockburst of underground opening triggered by dynamic disturbance , 2010 .

[25]  Shaoquan Kou,et al.  More accurate stress intensity factor derived by finite element analysis for the ISRM suggested rock fracture toughness specimen: CCNBD , 2003 .

[26]  R. J. Fowell,et al.  Suggested method for determining mode I fracture toughness using Cracked Chevron Notched Brazilian Disc (CCNBD) specimens , 1995 .

[27]  S. Sloan,et al.  Numerical study of failure behaviour of pre-cracked rock specimens under conventional triaxial compression , 2014 .

[28]  Z. Cui,et al.  A comparison of two ISRM suggested chevron notched specimens for testing mode-I rock fracture toughness , 2010 .

[29]  David J. Williams,et al.  The damage mechanism of rock fatigue and its relationship to the fracture toughness of rocks , 2012 .

[30]  J. Roegiers,et al.  FRACTURE TOUGHNESS DETERMINATION WITH THE MODIFIED RING TEST , 1988 .

[31]  Y. X. Wang,et al.  Determination of dynamic rock Mode-I fracture parameters using cracked chevron notched semi-circular bend specimen , 2011 .

[32]  M. Ayatollahi,et al.  Application of Cracked Triangular Specimen Subjected to Three-Point Bending for Investigating Fracture Behavior of Rock Materials , 2013, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[33]  Chengcheng Xu,et al.  The use of the cracked Brazilian disc geometry for rock fracture investigations , 1994 .

[34]  Musharraf Zaman,et al.  Fracture toughness of a soft sandstone , 1998 .

[35]  M.R.M. Aliha,et al.  Rock fracture toughness study using cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc specimen under pure modes I and II loading – A statistical approach , 2014 .

[36]  C. Atkinson,et al.  Combined mode fracture via the cracked Brazilian disk test , 1982, International Journal of Fracture.

[37]  Scott W. Sloan,et al.  Three-Dimensional Numerical Investigations of the Failure Mechanism of a Rock Disc with a Central or Eccentric Hole , 2014, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[38]  A. R. Rosenfield,et al.  Fracture Toughness of Ceramics Measured by a Chevron‐Notch Diametral‐Compression Test , 1985 .

[39]  Huilin Xing,et al.  A three-dimensional numerical investigation of the fracture of rock specimens containing a pre-existing surface flaw , 2012 .

[40]  M.R.M. Aliha,et al.  Geometry effects and statistical analysis of mode I fracture in guiting limestone , 2012 .

[41]  L. C. Schmidt,et al.  Rock fracture-toughness determination by the Brazilian test , 1993 .

[42]  K. Xia,et al.  Laboratory measurements of the rate dependence of the fracture toughness anisotropy of Barre granite , 2013 .

[43]  Chaoshui Xu,et al.  An Update on the Fracture Toughness Testing Methods Related to the Cracked Chevron-notched Brazilian Disk (CCNBD) Specimen , 2006 .

[44]  Soo-Ho Chang,et al.  Measurement of rock fracture toughness under modes I and II and mixed-mode conditions by using disc-type specimens , 2002 .

[45]  Jian-Hong Wu,et al.  Fracture toughness analysis on cracked ring disks of anisotropic rock , 2008 .

[46]  K. Xia,et al.  Dynamic cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc method for measuring rock fracture parameters , 2010 .

[47]  A. Rosenfield,et al.  Analysis of Indentation Crack as a Wedge‐Loaded Half‐Penny Crack , 1985 .

[48]  David J. Williams,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Studies on Determination of Indirect Tensile Strength of Rocks , 2011, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[49]  Xibing Li,et al.  Suggested Methods for Determining the Dynamic Strength Parameters and Mode-I Fracture Toughness of Rock Materials , 2012 .

[50]  A. K. Dube,et al.  Fracture toughness of rocks under sub-zero temperature conditions , 2000 .

[51]  K. P. Chong,et al.  New specimen for fracture toughness determination for rock and other materials , 1984 .

[52]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Recalibration and Clarification of the Formula Applied to the ISRM-Suggested CCNBD Specimens for Testing Rock Fracture Toughness , 2013, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[53]  I. L. Lim,et al.  Stress intensity factors for semi-circular specimens under three-point bending , 1993 .