Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the new millennium: a global perspective

[1]  R. Parker,et al.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques * , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[2]  S. Woo,et al.  The Effect of Knee Flexion Angle and Application of an Anterior Tibial Load at the Time of Graft Fixation on the Biomechanics of a Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee , 2000, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  S L Woo,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of a Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction* , 2000, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  L. Bisson,et al.  Double tunnel technique forreconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament , 1999 .

[5]  C. Harner,et al.  Double bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: University of Pittsburgh Approach , 1999 .

[6]  B. Reider,et al.  The Effect of Femoral Tunnel Position and Graft Tensioning Technique on Posterior Laxity of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee , 1995, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  E. Berg,et al.  Posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction. , 1995, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[8]  A. Amis,et al.  PCL reconstruction. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 'isometric' versus single and double-bundled 'anatomic' grafts. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.