Dipole characterization of single neurons from their extracellular action potentials

The spatial variation of the extracellular action potentials (EAP) of a single neuron contains information about the size and location of the dominant current source of its action potential generator, which is typically in the vicinity of the soma. Using this dependence in reverse in a three-component realistic probe + brain + source model, we solved the inverse problem of characterizing the equivalent current source of an isolated neuron from the EAP data sampled by an extracellular probe at multiple independent recording locations. We used a dipole for the model source because there is extensive evidence it accurately captures the spatial roll-off of the EAP amplitude, and because, as we show, dipole localization, beyond a minimum cell-probe distance, is a more accurate alternative to approaches based on monopole source models. Dipole characterization is separable into a linear dipole moment optimization where the dipole location is fixed, and a second, nonlinear, global optimization of the source location. We solved the linear optimization on a discrete grid via the lead fields of the probe, which can be calculated for any realistic probe + brain model by the finite element method. The global source location was optimized by means of Tikhonov regularization that jointly minimizes model error and dipole size. The particular strategy chosen reflects the fact that the dipole model is used in the near field, in contrast to the typical prior applications of dipole models to EKG and EEG source analysis. We applied dipole localization to data collected with stepped tetrodes whose detailed geometry was measured via scanning electron microscopy. The optimal dipole could account for 96% of the power in the spatial variation of the EAP amplitude. Among various model error contributions to the residual, we address especially the error in probe geometry, and the extent to which it biases estimates of dipole parameters. This dipole characterization method can be applied to any recording technique that has the capabilities of taking multiple independent measurements of the same single units.

[1]  D. Robinson,et al.  The electrical properties of metal microelectrodes , 1968 .

[2]  Chang Won Lee,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for Current Source Localization with Tetrodes , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  Solutions of ill-posed problems , 1977 .

[4]  C. Koch,et al.  On the origin of the extracellular action potential waveform: A modeling study. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Somadendritic backpropagation of action potentials in cortical pyramidal cells of the awake rat. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  A. Larkman,et al.  Correlations between morphology and electrophysiology of pyramidal neurons in slices of rat visual cortex. I. Establishment of cell classes , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  E J Vigmond,et al.  Mechanisms of electrical coupling between pyramidal cells. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Craig T. Nordhausen,et al.  Single unit recording capabilities of a 100 microelectrode array , 1996, Brain Research.

[10]  H. D. Patton,et al.  Dipole characteristics of pyramidal cell activity in cat postcruciate cortex. , 1966, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  M. S Jog,et al.  Tetrode technology: advances in implantable hardware, neuroimaging, and data analysis techniques , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  Klas H. Pettersen,et al.  Amplitude variability and extracellular low-pass filtering of neuronal spikes. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[13]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Intracellular features predicted by extracellular recordings in the hippocampus in vivo. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Role of electrode design on the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[15]  Christof Koch,et al.  Using extracellular action potential recordings to constrain compartmental models , 2007, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[16]  D. B. Heppner,et al.  Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. , 1967, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[17]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  The stereotrode: A new technique for simultaneous isolation of several single units in the central nervous system from multiple unit records , 1983, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Massively parallel recording of unit and local field potentials with silicon-based electrodes. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  D. Amaral,et al.  Morphological characteristics and electrophysiological properties of CA1 pyramidal neurons in macaque monkeys , 2005, Neuroscience.

[20]  Dorian Aur,et al.  Building spike representation in tetrodes , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  W. Rall Electrophysiology of a dendritic neuron model. , 1962, Biophysical journal.

[22]  D. Amaral,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the dendritic organization of pyramidal cells in the rat hippocampus , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[23]  T Bonhoeffer,et al.  Orientation selectivity in pinwheel centers in cat striate cortex. , 1997, Science.

[24]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  [Letters to nature] , 1996, Nature.

[25]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Sholl Da Dendritic organization in the neurons of the visual and motor cortices of the cat. , 1953 .

[27]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Characterization of neocortical principal cells and interneurons by network interactions and extracellular features. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  D. Hubel Tungsten Microelectrode for Recording from Single Units. , 1957, Science.

[29]  Dorian Aur,et al.  Computing spike directivity with tetrodes , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[30]  M. Moffitt,et al.  Model-based analysis of cortical recording with silicon microelectrodes , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Tetrodes markedly improve the reliability and yield of multiple single-unit isolation from multi-unit recordings in cat striate cortex , 1995, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  Ingmar H. Riedel-Kruse,et al.  High-resolution three-dimensional extracellular recording of neuronal activity with microfabricated electrode arrays. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  N. Logothetis,et al.  In Vivo Measurement of Cortical Impedance Spectrum in Monkeys: Implications for Signal Propagation , 2007, Neuron.

[34]  G. Buzsáki Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  C. Bédard,et al.  Modeling extracellular field potentials and the frequency-filtering properties of extracellular space. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[36]  Xuefeng F. Wei,et al.  Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[37]  R PLONSEY,et al.  RECIPROCITY APPLIED TO VOLUME CONDUCTORS AND THE ECG. , 1963, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[38]  R. Miles,et al.  Contributions of intrinsic and synaptic activities to the generation of neuronal discharges in in vitro hippocampus , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  T. Blanche,et al.  Polytrodes: high-density silicon electrode arrays for large-scale multiunit recording. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Christof Koch,et al.  Dynamic Moment Analysis of the Extracellular Electric Field of a Biologically Realistic Spiking Neuron , 2007, Neural Computation.

[41]  P. G Musial,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio improvement in multiple electrode recording , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[42]  C. Li,et al.  Specific resistivity of the cerebral cortex and white matter. , 1968, Experimental neurology.

[43]  C. Bédard,et al.  Model of low-pass filtering of local field potentials in brain tissue. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[44]  J. Dostrovsky,et al.  An improved method for insulating tungsten micro-electrodes with glass [proceedings]. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[45]  Mandar S. Jog,et al.  Spike source localization with tetrodes , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[46]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Specific impedance of rabbit cerebral cortex. , 1963, Experimental neurology.

[47]  K. Wise,et al.  Performance of planar multisite microprobes in recording extracellular single-unit intracortical activity , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[48]  Ifije E. Ohiorhenuan,et al.  Three-dimensional localization of neurons in cortical tetrode recordings. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  D. Contreras,et al.  Spatiotemporal Analysis of Local Field Potentials and Unit Discharges in Cat Cerebral Cortex during Natural Wake and Sleep States , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  U. Mitzdorf Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. , 1985, Physiological reviews.

[51]  C. Bédard,et al.  Macroscopic models of local field potentials and the apparent 1/f noise in brain activity. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[52]  H. Helmholtz Ueber einige Gesetze der Vertheilung elektrischer Ströme in körperlichen Leitern mit Anwendung auf die thierisch‐elektrischen Versuche , 1853 .

[53]  Mark M. Stecker,et al.  Electrical Properties of Metal Microelectrodes , 2000 .

[54]  Z. Somogyvári,et al.  Model-based source localization of extracellular action potentials , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[55]  W. A. Clark,et al.  Simultaneous Studies of Firing Patterns in Several Neurons , 1964, Science.

[56]  Dianne P. O'Leary,et al.  The Use of the L-Curve in the Regularization of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems , 1993, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[57]  O Herreras,et al.  Activity-dependent changes of tissue resistivity in the CA1 region in vivo are layer-specific: modulation of evoked potentials , 2001, Neuroscience.